Estimation of Lewis‐negative alleles by high‐resolution melting analysis of three tag SNPs of FUT3

Background and Objectives The expression of type 1 chain Lewis blood group antigens is regulated by secretor‐type α(1,2)fucosyltransferase, encoded by FUT2, and Lewis α(1,3/1,4)fucosyltransferase, encoded by FUT3. Accumulating evidence has linked Lewis phenotypes or genotypes to various clinical con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inVox sanguinis Vol. 117; no. 2; pp. 282 - 287
Main Authors Soejima, Mikiko, Koda, Yoshiro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2022
S. Karger AG
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Objectives The expression of type 1 chain Lewis blood group antigens is regulated by secretor‐type α(1,2)fucosyltransferase, encoded by FUT2, and Lewis α(1,3/1,4)fucosyltransferase, encoded by FUT3. Accumulating evidence has linked Lewis phenotypes or genotypes to various clinical conditions. Thus, in addition to FUT2, large‐scale FUT3 genotyping is important. Because FUT3 has two paralogous genes (FUT5 and FUT6) with high DNA sequence similarity, we should select the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers carefully for FUT3 genotyping. Previously, we suggested that 13G>A (rs28362458), 59T>G (rs28362459) and 202T>C (rs812936) could be selected as tag single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for detection of Lewis‐negative alleles (le). Materials and Methods In this study, three high‐resolution melting (HRM) analyses for genotyping these SNPs were developed and applied for 140 Japanese, eight Ghanaians and four Sinhalese subjects. Results Each of three genotypes of 13G>A (G/G, G/A, A/A), 59T>G (T/T, T/G, G/G) and 202T>C (T/T, T/C, C/C) was discriminated clearly. Although we need to be careful in interpretation of results due to SNPs other than the 59T>G in the amplicon, the results of 59T>G genotyping were in full agreement with the results by a previous PCR‐restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis in 140 Japanese. In addition, three heterozygotes of 202C substitution were identified, and no one having a 13A substitution was found in 140 Japanese. Conclusion The present HRM analyses are useful and reliable methods for large‐scale estimation of le alleles.
Bibliography:Funding information
None.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0042-9007
1423-0410
1423-0410
DOI:10.1111/vox.13168