An improved femtosecond laser‐ablation fluorination method for measurements of sulfur isotopic anomalies (∆33S and ∆36S) in sulfides with high precision

• Published in: Rapid communications in mass spectrometry Vol. 33; no. 22; pp. 1722 - 1729
• Main Authors: Velivetskaya, Tatiana A., Ignatiev, Alexander V., Yakovenko, Victoria V., Vysotskiy, Sergey V.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 30.11.2019
• Subjects: Anomalies; Fluorination; In situ measurement; Laser ablation; Lasers; Measurement methods; Minerals; Purification; Pyrite; Reference materials; Sulfides; Sulfur; Sulfur hexafluoride; Sulfur isotopes
• ISSN: 0951-4198; 1097-0231
• DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8528

Rationale Measurements of the multiple sulfur isotopic composition (δ34S, δ33S and δ36S values) of ancient sedimentary sulfide are useful for clarifying and reconstructing the picture of the global sulfur cycle on the early Earth. The methods used for these measurements should provide a high level of precision for the determination of sulfur isotope mass‐independent anomalies (∆33S and ∆36S values). Here we propose some improvements to the earlier published femtosecond laser‐ablation fluorination method to make it suitable for measuring both ∆33S and ∆36S values in the Archean sedimentary sulfides with acceptable precision. Methods A new gas purification system for the laser‐ablation fluorination method has been developed. The design of this system is based on temperature‐controlled flow traps for cryogenic separation of SF6 gas from other fluorinated products produced by fluorination of sulfide minerals. Compared with the previous version of the purification system, the efficiency of SF6 purification was significantly improved, which in turn improved the precision of the method for in situ GC/IRMS measurements of 36S/32S ratios (and determination of ∆36S values). Results The improved method was tested using IAEA reference materials, as well as samples of natural pyrite with zero and non‐zero sulfur isotope anomalies. For samples of ~12–13 nmol SF6 (optimal size), the overall precision of the method is ±0.03‰ for ∆33S values and ±0.27‰ for ∆36S values. This level of precision is satisfactory to examine the sulfur isotope anomalies in the rock. Conclusions The improved femtosecond laser‐ablation fluorination method is applicable for in situ measurements of δ34S, ∆33S and ∆36S values in sulfide minerals.