Perioperative outcomes of robot‐assisted vs video‐assisted and traditional open thoracic surgery for lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta‐analysis

• Published in: The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery Vol. 16; no. 5; pp. 1 - 14
• Main Authors: Hu, Junjie, Chen, Yan, Dai, Jie, Zhu, Xinsheng, Gonzalez‐Rivas, Diego, Jiang, Gening, Li, Hua, Zhang, Peng
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.10.2020
• Subjects: Lung cancer; Lymphatic system; Meta-analysis; Mortality; Ostomy; Robotic surgery; Subgroups; Thoracic surgery; thoracoscopic surgery; thoracotomy; lung cancer; thoracoscopic surgery; meta-analysis; thoracotomy; robotic surgery
• ISSN: 1478-5951; 1478-596X
• DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2123

Background The superiority of robot‐assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) over video‐assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and thoracotomy remains controversial for lung cancer. Methods A network meta‐analysis (NMA) and pairwise meta‐analysis (PMA) were performed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes using five databases. Results Thirty‐two studies involving 6593 patients were included for analysis. The NMA showed that RATS had similar operative time, conversion rate to thoracotomy, number of lymph node, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay with VATS, except for lower 30‐day mortality. Compared with thoracotomy, longer operative time and shorter hospital stay were observed in RATS, but no significant difference was observed in number of lymph node, postoperative morbidity, and 30‐day mortality in both NMA and PMA. In lobectomy/segmentectomy subgroup, all outcomes, except for operative time of RATS vs VATS and number of lymph node, were similar with overall analyses. Conclusions RATS had comparable perioperative outcomes with VATS and open surgery.