True verification probabilities should not be used in estimating the area under receiver operating characteristic curve
In medical research, a two‐phase study is often used for the estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of a diagnostic test. However, such a design introduces verification bias. One of the methods to correct verification bias is inverse probability weighting (IPW...
Saved in:
Published in | Statistics in medicine Vol. 39; no. 27; pp. 3937 - 3946 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
30.11.2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0277-6715 1097-0258 1097-0258 |
DOI | 10.1002/sim.8700 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In medical research, a two‐phase study is often used for the estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of a diagnostic test. However, such a design introduces verification bias. One of the methods to correct verification bias is inverse probability weighting (IPW). Since the probability a subject is selected into phase 2 of the study for disease verification is known, both true and estimated verification probabilities can be used to form an IPW estimator for AUC. In this article, we derive explicit variance formula for both IPW AUC estimators and show that the IPW AUC estimator using the true values of verification probabilities even when they are known are less efficient than its counterpart using the estimated values. Our simulation results show that the efficiency loss can be substantial especially when the variance of test result in disease population is small relative to its counterpart in nondiseased population. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0277-6715 1097-0258 1097-0258 |
DOI: | 10.1002/sim.8700 |