True verification probabilities should not be used in estimating the area under receiver operating characteristic curve

In medical research, a two‐phase study is often used for the estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of a diagnostic test. However, such a design introduces verification bias. One of the methods to correct verification bias is inverse probability weighting (IPW...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistics in medicine Vol. 39; no. 27; pp. 3937 - 3946
Main Author Wu, Yougui
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 30.11.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0277-6715
1097-0258
1097-0258
DOI10.1002/sim.8700

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In medical research, a two‐phase study is often used for the estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of a diagnostic test. However, such a design introduces verification bias. One of the methods to correct verification bias is inverse probability weighting (IPW). Since the probability a subject is selected into phase 2 of the study for disease verification is known, both true and estimated verification probabilities can be used to form an IPW estimator for AUC. In this article, we derive explicit variance formula for both IPW AUC estimators and show that the IPW AUC estimator using the true values of verification probabilities even when they are known are less efficient than its counterpart using the estimated values. Our simulation results show that the efficiency loss can be substantial especially when the variance of test result in disease population is small relative to its counterpart in nondiseased population.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0277-6715
1097-0258
1097-0258
DOI:10.1002/sim.8700