Open abdomen in gastrointestinal surgery: Which technique is the best for temporary closure during damage control?

• Published in: World journal of gastrointestinal surgery Vol. 8; no. 8; pp. 590 - 597
• Main Authors: Ribeiro Junior, Marcelo A F, Barros, Emily Alves, de Carvalho, Sabrina Marques, Nascimento, Vinicius Pereira, Cruvinel Neto, José, Fonseca, Alexandre Zanchenko
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 27.08.2016
• Subjects: Abdominal; closure; compartment; control; Damage; syndrome; Systematic Reviews; Temporary; Trauma; Abdominal compartment syndrome; Temporary abdominal closure; Trauma; Damage control
• ISSN: 1948-9366; 1948-9366
• DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i8.590

AIM To compare the 3 main techniques of temporary closure of the abdominal cavity, vacuum assisted closure (vacuum-assisted closure therapy - VAC), Bogota bag and Barker technique, in damage control surgery.METHODS After systematic review of the literature, 33 articles were selected to compare the efficiency of the three procedures. Criteria such as cost, infections, capacity of reconstruction of the abdominal wall, diseases associated with the technique, among others were analyzed.RESULTS The Bogota bag and Barker techniques present as advantage the availability of material and low cost,what is not observed in the VAC procedure. The VAC technique is the most efficient, not only because it reduces the tension on the boarders of the lesion, but also removes stagnant fluids and debris and acts at cellular level increasing cell proliferation and division.Bogota bag presents the higher rates of skin laceration and evisceration, greater need for a stent for draining fluids and wash-ups, higher rates of intestinal adhesion to the abdominal wall. The Barker technique presents lack of efficiency in closing the abdominal wall and difficulty on maintaining pressure on the dressing. The VAC dressing can generate irritation and dermatitis when the drape is applied, in addition to pain, infection and bleeding, as well as toxic shock syndrome, anaerobic sepsis and thrombosis.CONCLUSION The VAC technique, showed to be superior allowing a better control of liquid on the third space, avoiding complications such as fistula with small mortality, low infection rate, and easier capability on primary closure of the abdominal cavity.