Water footprint coupled economic impact assessment for maize production in China

• Published in: The Science of the total environment Vol. 752; p. 141963
• Main Authors: Bai, Yueyang, Zhang, Tianzuo, Zhai, Yijie, Shen, Xiaoxu, Ma, Xiaotian, Zhang, Ruirui, Ji, Changxing, Hong, Jinglan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 15.01.2021
• Subjects: Economic impact; Health and ecological damage; Life cycle assessment; Maize production; Water footprint; P; Life cycle assessment; EI; DALY; Species·yr; Health and ecological damage; Water footprint; GSD2; LCA; Economic impact; Maize production; WF
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141963

Nowadays, agricultural production places an enormous burden on freshwater resources, and the environmental external cost caused by the restoration of water quality degradation has attracted great attention. Maize is regarded as one of the world's major food security crops, and China is the second-largest maize producer. Thus, this study conducts an impact-oriented water footprint coupled economic impact assessment to quantify the water-related environmental impacts and economic burden caused by China's maize production from 2008 to 2017. Results show that the overall damage to human health and ecosystem quality of China's maize production in 2017 were 4.32 × 104 DALY and 4.62 × 103 Species·yr, respectively. The total economic cost was $ 2.15 × 1011, which included an internal cost of $ 5.99 × 1010 and external cost of $ 1.55 × 1011. Key factor analysis demonstrates that diesel and fertilizer production dominated the reduction in ecological and external cost burdens. Direct water consumption and labor cost played leading roles in human health and internal cost, respectively. The spatiotemporal variation assessment indicates that Inner Mongolia and Heilongjiang were the hotspots for water footprint and economic impact assessment results after considering the yield factor. The national average water footprint and economic impact caused by producing 1 ton of maize showed an upward trend from 2008 to 2015, however, a significant decline transpired later. Overall, improving the resource efficiency (i.e., diesel and freshwater), scientific application of fertilizer and reducing labor input can further lessen the water footprint and economic impact of maize production. Developing the social environment can also generate indirect environmental and economic benefits to China's maize production. [Display omitted] •An impact-oriented water footprint coupled economic impact assessment is conducted.•Health and ecologic damage are 4.32 × 104 DALY and 4.62 × 103 Species·yr, respectively.•External cost of maize production is more significant compared with internal cost.•The reduction of diesel consumption has great ecological and economic benefits.•China's maize production is closely related to the socio-environmental factors.