Independent repetition suppression in macaque area V2 and inferotemporal cortex

When a complexly structured natural image is presented twice in succession, first as adapter and then as test, neurons in area TE of macaque inferotemporal cortex exhibit repetition suppression, responding less strongly to the second presentation than to the first. This phenomenon, which has been st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neurophysiology Vol. 128; no. 6; pp. 1421 - 1434
Main Authors Williams, Nathaniel, Olson, Carl R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Physiological Society 01.12.2022
SeriesSensory Processing
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:When a complexly structured natural image is presented twice in succession, first as adapter and then as test, neurons in area TE of macaque inferotemporal cortex exhibit repetition suppression, responding less strongly to the second presentation than to the first. This phenomenon, which has been studied primarily in TE, might plausibly be argued to arise in TE because TE neurons respond selectively to complex images and thus carry information adequate for determining whether an image is or is not a repeat. However, the idea has never been put to a direct test. To resolve this issue, we monitored neuronal responses to sequences of complex natural images under identical conditions in areas V2 and TE. We found that repetition suppression occurs in both areas. Moreover, in each area, suppression takes the form of a dynamic alteration whereby the initial peak of excitation is followed by a trough and then a rebound of firing rate. To assess whether repetition suppression in either area is transmitted from the other area, we analyzed the timing of the phenomenon and its degree of spatial generalization. Suppression occurs at shorter latency in V2 than in TE. Therefore it is not simply fed back from TE. Suppression occurs in TE but not in V2 under conditions in which the test and adapter are presented in different visual field quadrants. Therefore it is not simply fed forward from V2. We conclude that repetition suppression occurs independently in V2 and TE. When a complexly structured natural image is presented twice in rapid succession, neurons in inferotemporal area TE exhibit repetition suppression, responding less strongly to the second than to the first presentation. We have explored whether this phenomenon is confined to high-order areas where neurons respond selectively to such images and thus carry information relevant to recognizing a repeat. We have found surprisingly that repetition suppression occurs even in low-order visual area V2.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-3077
1522-1598
DOI:10.1152/jn.00043.2022