Comments on “Notes on triple I method of fuzzy reasoning”
In this article, we will show that (1) the results about the triple I method for fuzzy reasoning obtained in the paper “Computers and Mathematics with Applications 44 (2002) 1567–1579” are correct; (2) Example 2.1 in the paper “Notes on triple I method of fuzzy reasoning” presented by Hua-wen Liu is...
Saved in:
Published in | Computers & mathematics with applications (1987) Vol. 58; no. 8; pp. 1604 - 1607 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
01.10.2009
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In this article, we will show that (1) the results about the triple I method for fuzzy reasoning obtained in the paper “Computers and Mathematics with Applications 44 (2002) 1567–1579” are correct; (2) Example 2.1 in the paper “Notes on triple I method of fuzzy reasoning” presented by Hua-wen Liu is incorrect; (3)
α
(
u
,
v
)
-triple I method presented by Liu is a generalization of
α
-triple I method. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0898-1221 1873-7668 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.04.024 |