Efficacy and Safety of Anti–Programmed Cell Death Protein 1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Antibodies Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for NSCLC in the People’s Republic of China: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: JTO clinical and research reports Vol. 5; no. 6; p. 100678
• Main Authors: Chen, Qi-An, Ma, Kai, Zhang, Lin, Lin, Wei-Hao, Wu, Xian-Xian, Gao, Yi-Bo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2024; Elsevier
• Subjects: Anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibody; China; Efficacy; Non–small cell lung cancer; Original; Safety; Efficacy; Non–small cell lung cancer; Anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibody; Safety; China
• ISSN: 2666-3643; 2666-3643
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100678

The available approved anticancer drugs for Chinese patients are relatively limited because of China's low participation rate in international clinical trials. Therefore, a focus on approved anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) drugs in China is needed. This study aims to assess the heterogeneity of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies manufactured in China (domestic PD-1/PD-L1) and overseas (imported PD-1/PD-L1) when combined with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of NSCLC. A systematic search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library of publications up to July 13, 2023. Meta-analysis was applied to compare the efficacy and safety profile between anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies plus chemotherapy (PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo) and chemotherapy alone using STATA software. Pooled hazard ratios for progression-free survival and overall survival, odds ratios for objective response rate, and incidence rate of grade greater than or equal to three treatment-related adverse events with 95% confidence intervals were calculated in the domestic group and imported group by a random-effects model, and the heterogeneity between the two estimates was assessed. There were 14 eligible clinical studies with a total of 3951 patients involved in this analysis, including eight studies of domestic PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo and six studies of imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo. The study revealed that there was no significant difference between domestic and imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo in overall survival (p = 0.80), progression-free survival (p = 0.53), and incidence rate of grade greater than or equal to three treatment-related adverse events (p = 0.10). Nevertheless, the objective response rate of imported PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo was significantly higher than that of domestic PD-1/PD-L1+Chemo (p = 0.03). Domestic anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies plus chemotherapy were found to have comparable efficacy and safety to those combined with imported anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies based on current evidence.