Association between Fat Distribution and Chronic Low Back Pain among 10,606 Adults: Data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

• Published in: International journal of environmental research and public health Vol. 19; no. 9; p. 5599
• Main Authors: Oh, Minji, Kim, Jongyeon, Lee, Suji, Lee, Seunghoon, Lee, Jae-Dong
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 05.05.2022; MDPI
• Subjects: Abdomen; Adipose Tissue; Adult; Adults; Back pain; Body composition; Body fat; Body mass index; Chronic Pain - epidemiology; Confidence intervals; Cross-Sectional Studies; Estimates; Female; Humans; Limbs; Low back pain; Low Back Pain - epidemiology; Male; Middle Aged; Nutrition; Nutrition Surveys; Obesity; Obesity - epidemiology; Pain; Population; Quality of life; Republic of Korea - epidemiology; Smoking; Sociodemographics; Statistical analysis; Republic of Korea; chronic low back pain; fat distribution; KNHANES; obesity; fat mass
• ISSN: 1660-4601; 1661-7827; 1660-4601
• DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095599

Obesity is associated with chronic low back pain (CLBP), but the association between fat distribution and CLBP is unclear. This cross-sectional study evaluated the relationship using the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. A total of 10,606 adults (average age: 45.4, female: 57.1%) were included. We estimated the regional fat distribution, waist circumference, and body fat proportion, compared the values in people with and without CLBP, and stratified the estimates by sex and obesity status using a multivariable linear model. There were no statistically significant differences in the average waist circumference between the people with and without CLBP (p = 0.731) and the average fat proportion between those with and without CLBP (p = 0.731). The average regional fat distribution was significantly higher in the people with CLBP than in those without CLBP, in the upper limbs (11.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [11.3, 11.5] vs. 11.2%, 95% CI: [11.1, 11.3], p < 0.05) and in the lower limbs (31.9%, 95% CI: [31.6, 32.2] vs. 31.4%, 95% CI: [31.2, 31.6], p < 0.01). More obvious among men, fat distribution in the lower limbs is higher than in people without obesity (p < 0.001). People with CLBP tend to have a higher fat distribution in the limbs than those without it and obese people with CLBP would need to reduce the fat in the lower limbs.