Managing irrigation under pressure: How supply chain demands and environmental objectives drive imbalance in agricultural resilience to water shortages

•Maintaining ‘headroom’ in licensed allocations help minimise the risk of negative impacts from water shortages.•Increasing system redundancy confers robustness but conflicts with pressures to maximise efficiency.•Pursuit of robustness and efficiency locks systems into rigid production pathways.•Fin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAgricultural water management Vol. 243; p. 106484
Main Authors Sutcliffe, Chloe, Knox, Jerry, Hess, Tim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.01.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•Maintaining ‘headroom’ in licensed allocations help minimise the risk of negative impacts from water shortages.•Increasing system redundancy confers robustness but conflicts with pressures to maximise efficiency.•Pursuit of robustness and efficiency locks systems into rigid production pathways.•Financial pressures force growers to focus on persistence of robust outputs at the cost of adaptability and transformability. Food production systems worldwide are increasingly exposed to water shortage shocks. Social-ecological resilience theory provides insights into the qualities which confer production systems with the capacity to absorb shocks and persist, undertake adaptations and ultimately achieve desirable transformations. Combining findings from the analysis of a set of 15 semi-structured interviews and 92 survey responses from growers in the UK, this paper uses resilience theory to explore the factors affecting exposure to the risk of water shortages, and management responses, within outdoor field vegetable production systems that depend on supplemental irrigation. The findings confirm that growers predominantly aim to build resilience by seeking to maintain a buffer or ‘headroom’ in their water resources to minimise the possibility that a shortage will disrupt their output of marketable produce and/ or lead to financial loss. This buffering strategy confers robustness by increasing system redundancy (availability of spare resources). But building-in redundancy conflicts with regulatory and supply chain pressures to maximise water and production efficiency respectively. Whilst stability of supply to consumers is, for the most-part, achieved, the discrepant pursuits of robustness and efficiency lock agricultural systems into increasingly rigid production and sales pathways, limiting capacities for adaptation and transformation - dimensions of resilience which permit successful system evolution in the context of more extreme shocks and stresses.
ISSN:0378-3774
1873-2283
DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106484