Spatial permutation entropy distinguishes resting brain states

We use ordinal analysis and spatial permutation entropy to distinguish between eyes-open and eyes-closed resting brain states. To do so, we analyze EEG data recorded with 64 electrodes from 109 healthy subjects, under two one-minute baseline runs: One with eyes open, and one with eyes closed. We use...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChaos, solitons and fractals Vol. 171; p. 113453
Main Authors Boaretto, Bruno R.R., Budzinski, Roberto C., Rossi, Kalel L., Masoller, Cristina, Macau, Elbert E.N.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.06.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We use ordinal analysis and spatial permutation entropy to distinguish between eyes-open and eyes-closed resting brain states. To do so, we analyze EEG data recorded with 64 electrodes from 109 healthy subjects, under two one-minute baseline runs: One with eyes open, and one with eyes closed. We use spatial ordinal analysis to distinguish between these states, where the permutation entropy is evaluated considering the spatial distribution of electrodes for each time instant. We analyze both raw and post-processed data considering only the alpha-band frequency (8–12Hz) which is known to be important for resting states in the brain. We conclude that spatial ordinal analysis captures information about correlations between time series in different electrodes. This allows the discrimination of eyes closed and eyes open resting states in both raw and filtered data. Filtering the data only amplifies the distinction between states. Importantly, our approach does not require EEG signal pre-processing, which is an advantage for real-time applications, such as brain-computer interfaces. •We use spatial ordinal analysis to distinguish between eyes closed and eyes open brain states in healthy subjects.•The spatial permutation entropy distinguishes these states in both, raw and filtered EEG data.•We show that the spatial approach outperforms the performance of standard ordinal analysis.
ISSN:0960-0779
1873-2887
DOI:10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113453