Measuring fossil fuel reserves: A simulation and review of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission approach
In its modernization of its reporting requirements, the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) defined measures of oil and gas reserves which exaggerated price changes leading to volatile financial reporting of reserves. To predict future prices they defined “current prices” on the basis of a d...
Saved in:
Published in | Resources policy Vol. 79; p. 103028 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
01.12.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In its modernization of its reporting requirements, the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) defined measures of oil and gas reserves which exaggerated price changes leading to volatile financial reporting of reserves. To predict future prices they defined “current prices” on the basis of a deterministic 12 month rolling average. They defined reserves to be “economically producible” based on a lagging measure, “current prices,” which converted a geophysical measure of fossil fuel formations into a price index of oil and gas prices. A simulation using actual crude oil prices from 2013 to 2021 pits these measures against a proposed measure, the expected economic resource amount, that accounts for uncertain outcomes, probabilistically weights price behavior, and eliminates false signals. Fitting into current SEC reporting procedures, the design provides a flexible platform upon which the SEC can accommodate the changing needs of the energy company stockholders and stakeholders.
•Fossil Fuel companies now worry about stranding reserves more than replacing them.•Obsolete SEC definitions of reserves are volatile because they are price indices.•The expected value formula can be adapted to stabilize resource measures.•Consistent measures of resource value can be used for financial reporting required by the SEC.•Such measures are similar to those already being used by Accountants, Economists, and Geologists. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0301-4207 1873-7641 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103028 |