The Fresh Assault on Insurance Coverage Mandates

Braidwood Management Inc. v. Becerra targets the ACA’s use of USPSTF recommendations as a basis for mandating insurance coverage for preventive care and threatens access to important health services.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe New England journal of medicine Vol. 388; no. 1; pp. 1 - 3
Main Authors Mello, Michelle M., O’Connell, Anne Joseph
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Massachusetts Medical Society 05.01.2023
Subjects
and Inclusion
Birth control
Constitutional law
Coronaviruses
COVID-19 vaccines
Disease transmission
Diversity
Employers
Equity
Federal court decisions
Freedom of religion
Gender
Health Law
Health Policy
Health services
Health Services Accessibility
Human papillomavirus
Humans
Insurance Coverage
Insurance Coverage - legislation & jurisprudence
Insurance, Health - legislation & jurisprudence
Judges & magistrates
Mandatory Programs - legislation & jurisprudence
Medical screening
Political appointments
Politics
Preventive medicine
Religious exemptions
Sexuality
United States
United States
United States > US
Texas
Health Policy
Medicine and the Law
Medical Ethics and Human Rights
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Braidwood Management Inc. v. Becerra targets the ACA’s use of USPSTF recommendations as a basis for mandating insurance coverage for preventive care and threatens access to important health services.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMp2213835