Relative contributions of natural and anthropogenic factors to the distribution patterns of nature reserves in mainland China

• Published in: The Science of the total environment Vol. 847; p. 157449
• Main Authors: Zhao, Ting, Miao, Congke, Wang, Jing, Su, Pinjie, Chu, Kuo, Luo, Yifu, Sun, Qiqi, Yao, Yanzhong, Song, Youtao, Bu, Naishun
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 15.11.2022
• Subjects: Anthropogenic activity threat; Desert and grassland coverage; Forest and wetland coverage; IUCN red-list species; Patterns of terrestrial nature reserves; IUCN red-list species; Anthropogenic activity threat; Patterns of terrestrial nature reserves; Desert and grassland coverage; Forest and wetland coverage
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157449

Nature reserves (NRs) are designated as a result of the ecosystem, species, economy, population, and land use coordination. However, the extent to which these factors influence the geographical pattern of NRs is unclear. Here, 11 indices (seven natural and four anthropogenic) were examined to identify these relationships in over 2600 terrestrial NRs in mainland China at the provincial level. Correlation analysis between natural and anthropogenic factors and NRs showed that desert and grassland had a positive correlation with NR coverage and area, and a negative correlation with NR density. This result was reversed in the correlation analysis between forest wetland coverage, endangered species, wildlife and NR coverage, area, and density. Similar results were found in the correlation analysis of all anthropogenic factors (population density, agricultural land, roads, and per capita GDP) with the coverage, area, and density of NRs. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) showed that three significant natural indicators (desert ecosystems, grasslands ecosystems, and forested and wetlands ecosystems) could explain 64.2 % of the pattern of NRs. The largest contributor was desert coverage, explaining 48.3 % (P = 0.002) of all indicators, followed by grassland coverage, explaining 8.6 % (P = 0.012), and forest and wetland coverage, explaining 7.3 % (P = 0.008). Human activities were significantly positively correlated with forest and wetland coverage, flora, and fauna, and negatively correlated with desert and grassland coverage. Compared with sand and grassland in the western region, the forest wetlands and wildlife in the eastern and central provinces were under greater pressure from anthropogenic activities. Therefore, natural factors determine the general layout of NRs, while the influence of anthropogenic activities makes the distribution of NRs patchy. When establishing national parks, governments must design strategies to coordinate areas with high biodiversity and high levels of human activity. [Display omitted] •Ecosystem types explained 64.2 % of nature reserve (NR) distribution.•Anthropogenic factors positively influenced natural factors (0.63).•Anthropogenic and natural factors had similar impact on NR distributions.