Brain activation associated with low‐ and high‐intensity concentric versus eccentric isokinetic contractions of the biceps brachii: An fNIRS study

• Published in: Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports Vol. 34; no. 1; pp. e14499 - n/a
• Main Authors: Teo, Wei‐Peng, Tan, Clara Xinru, Goodwill, Alicia M., Mohammad, Saqif, Ang, Yi‐Xuan, Latella, Christopher
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Denmark Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2024
• Subjects: Arm; Brain; Exercise Therapy; functional near‐infrared spectroscopy; Humans; motor cortex; muscle contraction; Muscle Contraction - physiology; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; prefrontal cortex; Young Adult; muscle contraction; motor cortex; functional near-infrared spectroscopy; prefrontal cortex
• ISSN: 0905-7188; 1600-0838
• DOI: 10.1111/sms.14499

Studies have shown that neural responses following concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC) muscle contractions are different, which suggests differences in motor control associated with CON and ECC contractions. This study aims to determine brain activation of the left primary motor cortex (M1) and left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (DLPFCs) during ECC and CON of the right bicep brachii (BB) muscle at low‐ and high‐contraction intensities. Eighteen young adults (13M/5F, 21–35 years) were recruited to participate in one familiarization and two testing sessions in a randomized crossover design. During each testing session, participants performed either ECC or CON contractions of the BB (3 sets × 8 reps) at low‐ (25% of maximum ECC/CON, 45°/s) and high‐intensity (75% of maximum ECC/CON, 45°/s) on an isokinetic dynamometer. Eleven‐channel functional near‐infrared spectroscopy was used to measure changes in oxyhemoglobin (O2Hb) from the left M1, and left and right DLPFC during ECC and CON contractions. Maximum torque for ECC was higher than CON (43.3 ± 14.1 vs. 46.2 ± 15.7 N m, p = 0.025); however, no differences in O2Hb were observed between contraction types at low or high intensities in measured brain regions. High‐intensity ECC and CON contractions resulted in greater increases in O2Hb of M1 and bilateral DLPFC compared to low‐intensity ECC and CON contractions (p = 0.014). Our findings suggest no differences in O2Hb responses between contraction types at high and low intensities. High‐contraction intensities resulted in greater brain activation of the M1 and bilateral DLPFC, which may have implications for neurorehabilitation to increase central adaptations from exercise.