CACS, CCTA and mCAD‐LT score in the pre‐transplant assessment of coronary artery disease and the prediction of post‐transplant cardiovascular events

• Published in: Liver international Vol. 44; no. 8; pp. 1912 - 1923
• Main Authors: Pagano, Giulia, Sastre, Lydia, Blasi, Annabel, Brugaletta, Salvatore, Mestres, Judit, Martinez‐Ocon, Julia, Ortiz‐Pérez, Jose T., Viñals, Clara, Prat‐Gonzàlez, Susanna, Rivas, Eva, Perea, Rosario J., Rodriguez‐Tajes, Sergio, Muxí, África, Ortega, Emilio, Doltra, Ada, Ruiz, Pablo, Vidal, Bàrbara, Martínez‐Palli, Graciela, Colmenero, Jordi, Crespo, Gonzalo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.08.2024
• Subjects: Angiography; Arteriosclerosis; CACS; CAD‐LT score; Calcification (ectopic); Cardiovascular disease; coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; Coronary vessels; Genetics; Heart diseases; Liver diseases; Liver transplantation; Medical imaging; Performance evaluation; Vein & artery diseases; coronary artery disease; CACS; coronary angiography; liver transplantation; CAD‐LT score
• ISSN: 1478-3223; 1478-3231; 1478-3231
• DOI: 10.1111/liv.15926

Background The optimal cardiovascular assessment of liver transplant (LT) candidates is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the performance of CT‐based coronary tests (coronary artery calcium score [CACS] and coronary CT angiography [CCTA]) and a modification of the CAD‐LT score (mCAD‐LT, excluding family history of CAD) to diagnose significant coronary artery disease (CAD) before LT and predict the incidence of post‐LT cardiovascular events (CVE). Methods We retrospectively analysed a single‐centre cohort of LT candidates who underwent non‐invasive tests; invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was performed depending on the results of non‐invasive tests. mCAD‐LT was calculated in all patients. Results Six‐hundred‐and‐thirty‐four LT candidates were assessed and 351 of them underwent LT. CACS, CCTA and ICA were performed in 245, 123 and 120 LT candidates, respectively. Significant CAD was found in 30% of patients undergoing ICA. The AUROCs of mCAD‐LT (.722) and CCTA (.654) were significantly higher than that of CACS (.502) to predict the presence of significant CAD. Specificity of the tests ranged between 31% for CCTA and 53% for CACS. Among patients who underwent LT, CACS ≥ 400 and mCAD‐LT were independently associated with the incidence of CVE; in patients who underwent CCTA before LT, significant CAD at CCTA also predicted post‐LT CVE. Conclusion In this cohort, mCAD‐LT score and CT‐based tests detect the presence of significant CAD in LT candidates, although they tend to overestimate it. Both mCAD‐LT score and CT‐based tests classify LT recipients according to their risk of post‐LT CVE and can be used to improve post‐LT risk mitigation.