Synthesis, docking study, and antitumor evaluation of benzamides and oxadiazole derivatives of 3‐phenoxybenzoic acid as VEGFR‐2 inhibitors

Current chemotherapeutic agents have several limitations, including lack of selectivity, the development of undesirable side effects, and chemoresistance. As a result, there is an unmet need for the development of novel small molecules with minimal side effects and the ability to specifically target...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDrug development research Vol. 85; no. 3; pp. e22186 - n/a
Main Authors Heriz, Mohammad H., Mahmood, Ammar A. R., Yasin, Salem R., Saleh, Khaled M., AlSakhen, Mai F., Kanaan, Sana I., Himsawi, Nisreen, Saleh, Abdulrahman M., Tahtamouni, Lubna H.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Current chemotherapeutic agents have several limitations, including lack of selectivity, the development of undesirable side effects, and chemoresistance. As a result, there is an unmet need for the development of novel small molecules with minimal side effects and the ability to specifically target tumor cells. A new series of 3‐phenoxybenzoic acid derivatives, including 1,3,4‐oxadiazole derivatives (4a–d) and benzamides derivatives (5a–e) were synthesized; their chemical structures were confirmed by Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy, 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), 13C NMR, and mass spectra; and various physicochemical properties were determined. The antiproliferative activities of the new derivatives were evaluated by means of the 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Three compounds (4b, 4c, and 4d) exhibited cytotoxicity against two of the three cell lines tested, five compounds (3, 4a, 5a, 5b, and 5e) were toxic to one cell line, while two compounds (5c and 5d) were not cytotoxic to any of the three cell lines tested in the current study. Based on docking scores, MTT assay findings, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR‐2) kinase activity data, Compound 4d was selected for further biological investigation. Flow cytometry was used to determine the mode of cell death (apoptosis vs. necrosis) and the effect on cell cycle progression. Compound 4d arrested HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells in the G2/M phase and activated both the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways. In conclusion, Compound 4d has shown promising results for future research as a potent VEGFR‐2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0272-4391
1098-2299
DOI:10.1002/ddr.22186