Glucose volume of distribution affects insulin sensitivity measured by intravenous glucose tolerance test

• Published in: Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. e14574 - n/a
• Main Authors: Mora‐Gonzalez, Diego, Moreno‐Cabañas, Alfonso, Alvarez‐Jimenez, Laura, Morales‐Palomo, Felix, Ortega, Juan Fernando, Mora‐Rodriguez, Ricardo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Denmark Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2024
• Subjects: adiposity; Blood Glucose; Body fat; fat free mass; Glucose; Glucose Tolerance Test; glucose volume of distribution; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; insulin sensitivity; intravenous glucose tolerance test; maximal oxygen consumption; metabolic syndrome; prediabetes; metabolic syndrome; insulin sensitivity; adiposity; fat free mass; prediabetes; maximal oxygen consumption; glucose volume of distribution; intravenous glucose tolerance test
• ISSN: 0905-7188; 1600-0838
• DOI: 10.1111/sms.14574

Aim To determine whether glucose volume of distribution (VdGLUCOSE) affects the diagnosis of impaired insulin sensitivity (IS) when using an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). Methods Individuals with distinct levels of IS underwent IVGTT after an overnight fast. The prediabetic group (Prediab; n = 33) differed from the healthy group (Healthy; n = 14) in their larger glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c of 5.9 ± 0.3 vs. 5.4 ± 0.1%; 41 ± 4 vs. 36 ± 1 mmol/mol; p < 0.001), percent body fat (37 ± 6 vs. 24 ± 3%; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular fitness level (VO2MAX 22 ± 5 vs. 44 ± 5 mL of O2·kg−1·min−1; p < 0.001). Ten minutes after intravenous infusion of the glucose bolus (i.e., 35 g in a 30% solution), VdGLUCOSE was assessed from the increases in plasma glucose concentration. IS was calculated during the next 50 min using the slope of glucose disappearance and the insulin time‐response curve. Results VdGLUCOSE was higher in Healthy than in Prediab (230 ± 49 vs. 185 ± 21 mL·kg−1; p < 0.001). VdGLUCOSE was a strong predictor of IS (β standardized coefficient 0.362; p = 0.004). VO2MAX was associated with VdGLUCOSE and IS (Pearson r = 0.582 and 0.704, respectively; p < 0.001). However, body fat was inversely associated with VdGLUCOSE and IS (r = −0.548 and −0.555, respectively; p < 0.001). Conclusions Since fat mass is inversely related to VdGLUCOSE and in turn, VdGLUCOSE affects the calculations of IS, the IV glucose bolus dose should be calculated based on fat‐free mass rather than body weight for a more accurate diagnosis of impaired IS.