Principle and antimicrobial efficacy of laser‐activated irrigation: A narrative review

• Published in: International endodontic journal Vol. 57; no. 7; pp. 841 - 860
• Main Authors: Meire, Maarten, De Moor, Roeland J. G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.07.2024
• Subjects: Anti-Infective Agents - pharmacology; Anti-Infective Agents - therapeutic use; Cavitation; Clinical trials; Endodontics; Er:YAG; Er;Cr:YSGG; Humans; irrigation; laser; Lasers; Lavage; Periodontitis; root canal disinfection; Root Canal Irrigants - pharmacology; Root Canal Preparation - methods; Root canals; Therapeutic Irrigation - methods; Er;Cr:YSGG; root canal disinfection; Er:YAG; irrigation; laser; cavitation
• ISSN: 0143-2885; 1365-2591
• DOI: 10.1111/iej.14042

In the last two decades, the activation of root canal irrigants with pulsed lasers as an adjunct in root canal treatment has become increasingly popular. This narrative review explains the physical basics and the working mechanism of laser‐activated irrigation (LAI), explores the parameters influencing LAI efficacy, considers historical evolutions in the field and summarizes laboratory and clinical evidence with emphasis on the antimicrobial action of LAI. Cavitation is the driving force behind LAI, with growing and imploding vapour bubbles around the laser tip causing various secondary phenomena in the irrigant, leading to intense liquid dynamics throughout the underlying root canal. High‐speed imaging research has shown that laser wavelength, pulse energy, pulse length and fibre tip geometry are parameters that influence this cavitation process. Nevertheless, this has not resulted in standardized settings for LAI. Consequently, there is significant variability in studies assessing LAI efficacy, complicating the synthesis of results. Laboratory studies in extracted teeth suggest that, with regard to canal disinfection, LAI is superior to conventional irrigation and there is a trend of higher antimicrobial efficacy of LAI compared to ultrasonic activation. Clinical evidence is limited to trials demonstrating similar postoperative pain levels after LAI versus no activation or ultrasonic activation. Clinical evidence concerning the effect of LAI on healing of apical periodontitis as yet is scarce.