Returning to work after breast cancer: A systematic review of reviews

BACKGROUND: Due to improvements in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, the healthcare system faces a growing number of cancer survivors. Breast cancer survivors experience many difficulties when returning to work, including discrimination at work and lack of support by employers and colleagues. O...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWORK Vol. 61; no. 3; pp. 463 - 476
Main Authors Cocchiara, R.A., Sciarra, I., D’Egidio, V., Sestili, C., Mancino, M., Backhaus, I., Mannocci, A., De Luca, A., Frusone, F., Di Bella, O., Di Murro, F., Palmeri, V., Lia, L., Paradiso, G., Aceti, V., Libia, A., Monti, M., La Torre, G.
Format Book Review Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London, England SAGE Publications 01.01.2018
IOS Press BV
Subjects
Adult
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - complications
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Cancer
Female
Health care
Heterogeneity
Humans
Middle Aged
Occupational health
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation, Vocational - standards
Return to Work - psychology
Return to Work - trends
Systematic review
breast cancer
rehabilitation
tertiary prevention
Occupational medicine
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:BACKGROUND: Due to improvements in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, the healthcare system faces a growing number of cancer survivors. Breast cancer survivors experience many difficulties when returning to work, including discrimination at work and lack of support by employers and colleagues. OBJECTIVE: To point out the knowledge in literature up to date about return to work (RTW) after breast cancer, the factors influencing it and the interventions to facilitate it. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in January 2017 using the databases Medline (PubMed) and Scopus. Studies were included if they analyzed the problem of RTW in women treated for breast cancer. RESULTS: Twenty-six articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies were divided into four themes: factors facilitating or impeding RTW; interventions to enhance RTW; lived experiences of RTW; economic aspects related to cancer survivors and RTW. CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneity of the interventions suggests the need for a better definition of the concept of RTW. To compare interventions, studies should use a rigorous approach and better outcome measures should be identified to evaluate RTW.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1051-9815
1875-9270
DOI:10.3233/WOR-182810