Unilateral locking plate versus unilateral locking plate combined with compression bolt for Schatzker I–IV tibial plateau fractures: a comparative study

• Published in: International orthopaedics Vol. 46; no. 5; pp. 1133 - 1143
• Main Authors: Wang, Zhongzheng, Zheng, Zhanle, Wang, Yuchuan, Zhu, Yanbin, Tan, Zhanchao, Chen, Wei, Hou, Zhiyong, Zhang, Yingze
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.05.2022
• Subjects: Adult; Bone Plates; Fracture Fixation, Internal - adverse effects; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods; Fracture Healing; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Paper; Orthopedics; Retrospective Studies; Tibial Fractures - surgery; Treatment Outcome; Tibial plateau fracture; Locking plate; Internal fixation; Compression bolt
• ISSN: 0341-2695; 1432-5195
• DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05324-1

Background The quality and durability of fracture reduction play an important role in the functional prognosis of articulation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the radiological and clinical effects of compression bolts in the treatment of Schatzker I–IV tibial plateau fractures (TPFs). Methods Between May 2015 and April 2018, a total of 96 consecutive adult patients with operatively treated Schatzker I–IV TPFs were included and divided into two groups according to the internal fixations: Group 1 (unilateral locking plate) and Group 2 (unilateral locking plate combined with compression bolt). Data on demographic and fracture characteristics, postoperative follow-up imaging, intraoperative indicators, postoperative reduction quality and durability, clinical outcomes, and complications were retrospectively collected and compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant intergroup differences in preoperative baseline data, duration of operation, intra-operative blood loss, days in hospital, rate of immediate post-operative reduction loss, or complications. The time of fracture healing, the rate of secondary reduction loss, and the mean WOMAC score were significantly reduced compared with those in Group 1 ( P  = 0.024, 0.015, and 0.024, respectively). There were significant intergroup differences in the mean HSS score (89.0 ± 11.4 vs. 94.4 ± 6.7, P  = 0.042), the mean Lysholm score (83.8 ± 9.6 vs. 88.4 ± 5.2, P  = 0.027), and the mean SF-36 score (82.8 ± 12.5 vs. 90.5 ± 7.6, P  = 0.001). Additionally, there were similar significant differences in subgroup analysis (only included patients with Schatzker II–III), except for WOMAC score. Conclusion Compared with unilateral locking plate fixation, unilateral locking plate combined with compressing bolt fixation can reduce the rate of secondary reduction loss, accelerate fracture healing, and show better clinical outcomes for patients with Schatzker I–IV TPFs.