Sperm Selection Using Three Semen Processing Techniques

• Published in: JBRA assisted reproduction Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 223 - 226
• Main Authors: Ramos, Vivian Berkenbroch, Cipriani, Daniela da Cunha, Araújo, Eduardo Schuchowsky, Salvador, Rafael Alonso, Senn, Alfred Paul, Frajblat, Marcel, Amaral, Vera Lucia Lângaro
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Brazil 01.11.2015
• Subjects: Sperm selection; Assisted reproduction; Sperm preparation; Migration-sedimentation
• ISSN: 1518-0557; 1518-0557
• DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20150043

This study aimed to assess the efficiency, in terms of recovered motile spermatozoa with normal morphology, of three sperm selection techniques: migration- sedimentation (SS), swim-up from fresh semen (SF), and swim-up from washed (SL) sperm. Samples from 20 normozoospermic men were divided into three equal aliquots and processed in parallel. SS was performed in a Jondet tube, using 1 ml of semen and 2.5 ml of Human Tubal Fluid medium (HTF+10% Synthetic Serum Supplement, Irvine, USA). For SF, 1 ml of HTF was layered over 1 ml of fresh semen (SF). For SL, 1 ml of sperm was first centrifuged (300 g, 10 min) and the pellet resuspended in 1 ml of HTF; a second layer of HTF was placed on top. Migration time was 1h (SF and SL) and 1h30' for SS at 37°C. After migration, 200 μl were removed from the top layer (SF, SL) and from the central cone (SS). Concentration, morphology and motility were determined. Recovery rates were 25% for SS, 10.1% for SF and 4.5% for SL. SS recovery rate was significantly higher (P<0.01) than the two swim-up techniques. Total motility was statistically different (P<0.001), with 93.6% for SS, 91.2% for SF, and 77% for SL. Sperm morphology was similar between the three techniques (P= 0.12). SS is an efficient technique for the recovery of motile spermatozoa from native semen preparations and yielded better results than SF and SL. Routine use for assisted reproduction remains to be evaluated.