Profiling of Recovery Efficiencies for Three Standard Protocols (FDA-BAM, ISO-11290, and Modified USDA) on Temperature-Injured Listeria monocytogenes

There have been a number of studies conducted in order to compare the efficiencies of recovery rates, utilizing different protocols, for the isolation of L. monocytogenes. However, the severity of multiple cell injury has not been included in these studies. In the current study, L. monocytogenes ATC...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of microbiology and biotechnology Vol. 21; no. 9; pp. 954 - 959
Main Authors Lee, Hai Yen, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia, Chai, Lay Ching, Universiti Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Pui, Chai Fung, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia, Wong, Woan Chwen, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia, Mustafa, Shuhaimi, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia, Cheah, Yoke Kqueen, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia, Issa, Zuraini Mat, Universiti Teknologi MARA Malaysia, Shah Alam, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia, Nishibuchi, Mitsuaki, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Radu, Son, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Seoul Korean Society for Applied Microbiology 01.09.2011
한국미생물·생명공학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There have been a number of studies conducted in order to compare the efficiencies of recovery rates, utilizing different protocols, for the isolation of L. monocytogenes. However, the severity of multiple cell injury has not been included in these studies. In the current study, L. monocytogenes ATCC 19112 was injured by exposure to extreme temperatures (60℃ and -20℃) for a one-step injury, and for a two-step injury the cells were transferred directly from a heat treatment to frozen state to induce a severe cell injury (up to 100% injury). The injured cells were then subjected to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the ISO-11290, and the modified United States Department of Agriculture (mUSDA) protocols, and plated on TSAyeast (0.6% yeast), PALCAM agar, and CHROMAgar Listeria for 24 h or 48 h. The evaluation of the total recovery of injured cells was also calculated based on the costs involved in the preparation of media for each protocol. Results indicate that the mUSDA method is best able to aid the recovery of heat-injured, freeze-injured, and heat-freeze-injured cells and was shown to be the most cost effective for heat-freeze-injured cells.
Bibliography:A50
2012000822
G704-000169.2011.21.9.015
ISSN:1017-7825
1738-8872
DOI:10.4014/jmb.1012.12034