The effect of exercise intensity and cardiorespiratory fitness on the kinetic response of middle cerebral artery blood velocity during exercise in healthy adults

This is the first study to model the MCAv kinetic response to moderate- and heavy-intensity cycling in healthy adults. This study found that the amplitude of the exponential rise in MCAv at exercise onset was greater during heavy-intensity exercise (∼34%) compared with moderate-intensity exercise (∼...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 133; no. 1; pp. 214 - 222
Main Authors Weston, Max E., Barker, Alan R., Tomlinson, Owen W., Coombes, Jeff S., Bailey, Tom G., Bond, Bert
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Physiological Society 01.07.2022
SeriesPhysical Activity and the Brain
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN8750-7587
1522-1601
1522-1601
DOI10.1152/japplphysiol.00862.2021

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This is the first study to model the MCAv kinetic response to moderate- and heavy-intensity cycling in healthy adults. This study found that the amplitude of the exponential rise in MCAv at exercise onset was greater during heavy-intensity exercise (∼34%) compared with moderate-intensity exercise (∼19%), but the time-based characteristics of the responses were similar between intensities. Higher cardiorespiratory fitness was not associated with a greater or faster MCAv response to moderate- or heavy-intensity exercise. The aim of this study was to compare the kinetic response of middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) to moderate- and heavy-intensity cycling in adults, and explore the relationship between maximal oxygen uptake (V̇o 2max ) and MCAv kinetics. Seventeen healthy adults (23.8 ± 2.4 yr, 9 females) completed a ramp incremental test to exhaustion on a cycle ergometer to determine V̇o 2max and the gas exchange threshold (GET). Across six separate visits, participants completed three 6-min transitions at a moderate intensity (90% GET) and three at a heavy intensity (40% of the difference between GET and V̇o 2max ). Bilateral MCAv was measured using transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography and analyzed using a monoexponential model with a time delay. The time constant (τ) of the MCAv response was not different between moderate- and heavy-intensity cycling (25 ± 10 vs. 26 ± 8 s, P = 0.82), as was the time delay (29 ± 11 vs. 29 ± 10 s, P = 0.95). The amplitude of the exponential increase in MCAv from baseline was greater during heavy-intensity cycling (23.9 ± 10.0 cm·s −1 , 34.1 ± 14.4%) compared with moderate-intensity cycling (12.7 ± 4.4 cm·s −1 , 18.7 ± 7.5%; P < 0.01). Following the exponential increase, a greater fall in MCAv was observed during heavy-intensity exercise compared with moderate-intensity exercise (9.5 ± 6.9 vs. 2.8 ± 3.8 cm·s −1 , P < 0.01). MCAv after 6 min of exercise remained elevated during heavy-intensity exercise compared with moderate-intensity exercise (85.2 ± 9.6 vs. 79.3 ± 7.7 cm·s −1 , P ≤ 0.01). V̇o 2max was not correlated with MCAv τ or amplitude ( r = 0.11–0.26, P > 0.05). These data suggest that the intensity of constant-work rate exercise influences the amplitude, but not time-based, response parameters of MCAv in healthy adults, and found no relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and MCAv kinetics. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to model the MCAv kinetic response to moderate- and heavy-intensity cycling in healthy adults. This study found that the amplitude of the exponential rise in MCAv at exercise onset was greater during heavy-intensity exercise (∼34%) compared with moderate-intensity exercise (∼19%), but the time-based characteristics of the responses were similar between intensities. Higher cardiorespiratory fitness was not associated with a greater or faster MCAv response to moderate- or heavy-intensity exercise.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:8750-7587
1522-1601
1522-1601
DOI:10.1152/japplphysiol.00862.2021