A comparison of impulse response modification techniques for time reversal with application to crack detection

Time reversal (TR) focusing used for nonlinear detection of cracks relies on the ability of the TR process to provide spatially localized, high-amplitude excitation. The high amplitude improves the ability to detect nonlinear features that are a signature of the motion of closed cracks. It follows t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Vol. 145; no. 5; p. 3195
Main Authors Young, Sarah M, Anderson, Brian E, Willardson, Matthew L, Simpson, Paige E, Le Bas, Pierre-Yves
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.05.2019
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Time reversal (TR) focusing used for nonlinear detection of cracks relies on the ability of the TR process to provide spatially localized, high-amplitude excitation. The high amplitude improves the ability to detect nonlinear features that are a signature of the motion of closed cracks. It follows that a higher peak focal amplitude than what can be generated with the traditional TR process will improve the detection capability. Modifying the time-reversed impulse response to increase the amplitude of later arrivals in the impulse response, while maintaining the phase information of all arrivals, increases the overall focal signal amplitude. A variety of existing techniques for increasing amplitude are discussed, and decay compensation TR, a technique wherein amplitude is increased according to the inverse of the amplitude envelope of the impulse response decay, is identified as the best modification technique for nonlinear crack detection. This technique increases the focal signal amplitude with a minor introduction of harmonic content, a drawback in two other methods studied, one-bit TR and clipping TR. A final study employs both decay compensation TR and traditional TR, focusing on a rod with stress corrosion cracking, and compares the merits of each in detecting nonlinearity from cracks in a real system.
ISSN:1520-8524
DOI:10.1121/1.5109395