Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and other inflammatory markers in patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcomas

Background Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) have a high risk of relapse in spite of the use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. In this context, looking for new prognostic biomarkers is an interesting field of research. Our aim is to analyze the prognostic impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and oth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical & translational oncology Vol. 22; no. 10; pp. 1849 - 1856
Main Authors Viñal, D., Martinez, D., Garcia-Cuesta, J. A., Gutierrez-Sainz, L., Martinez-Recio, S., Villamayor, J., Martinez-Marin, V., Gallego, A., Ortiz-Cruz, E., Mendiola, M., Pozo-Kreilinger, J. J., Berjon, A., Belinchon, B., Bernabeu, D., Espinosa, E., Feliu, J., Redondo, A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.10.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) have a high risk of relapse in spite of the use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. In this context, looking for new prognostic biomarkers is an interesting field of research. Our aim is to analyze the prognostic impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and other serum markers in patients with STS who received chemotherapy with curative intent. Materials and methods This is a retrospective observational study. We included all patients with STS (primary tumor, local recurrence or resected metastatic disease) treated with high-dose ifosfamide and epirubicin with curative intent from January 2007 to December 2018. The pretreatment NLR and other serum markers were calculated, selecting the median as the cut-off value for the survival and multivariate analysis. Results Seventy-nine patients were included. Median NLR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were 2.83, 174.05 and 3.25, respectively. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in patients with low NLR [not reached (NR) vs 21, 92 months, P  < 0.01]. No significant differences were found for PFS regarding PLR or LMR. For overall survival (OS), a significant survival advantage was also found for patients with low NLR (NR vs 65.45 months, P  = 0.01), without differences for PLR or LMR. In multivariate analysis, NLR remains an independent prognostic factor for PFS. Conclusion In our cohort, low NLR was significantly associated with a longer PFS and OS, and is consolidated as an independent prognostic factor.
ISSN:1699-048X
1699-3055
DOI:10.1007/s12094-020-02324-8