Seatbelt law enforcement and motor vehicle crash fatalities among blacks and whites in Louisiana and Mississippi

Seatbelt laws save lives. Primary enforcement (allowing citations solely for seatbelt nonuse) is a more effective means of saving lives, yet seven southern states have no primary laws, due in part to concern about racial profiling. Non-Hispanic, black:white (B:W), occupant motor vehicle crash mortal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSouthern medical journal (Birmingham, Ala.) Vol. 99; no. 2; pp. 143 - 148
Main Authors LEVINE, Robert S, BRIGGS, Nathaniel C, SCHLUNDT, David G, STINSON, Nathan, WARREN, Rueben C, GOLDZWEIG, Irwin A
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hagerstown, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01.02.2006
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Seatbelt laws save lives. Primary enforcement (allowing citations solely for seatbelt nonuse) is a more effective means of saving lives, yet seven southern states have no primary laws, due in part to concern about racial profiling. Non-Hispanic, black:white (B:W), occupant motor vehicle crash mortality rate ratios (MRRs) were compared across the 15 to 64 age range over two time periods in two demographically comparable southern states (Louisiana and Mississippi). From 1992 to 1994 (when neither state had primary law) to 1996 to 1998 (when Louisiana had primary law) B:W MRRs were 0.73 (95% confidence interval = 0.61, 0.88) and 0.72 (0.60, 0.86) in Louisiana and 1.01 (0.9, 1.12) and 1.22 (1.10, 1.35) in Mississippi. Successful opposition to primary seat belt enforcement may have the unintended effect of producing racial disparities in motor vehicle crash mortality that adversely affects blacks.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0038-4348
1541-8243
DOI:10.1097/01.smj.0000198493.84629.75