The evolution of age‐specific choosiness and reproductive isolation in a model with overlapping generations

• Published in: Evolution Vol. 76; no. 2; pp. 225 - 235
• Main Authors: Cotto, Olivier, Servedio, Maria R., Day, Troy
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Oxford University Press 01.02.2022; Wiley
• Subjects: Age; Age composition; Age Factors; Animals; choosiness; Divergence; Evolution; Female; Females; Gene frequency; Genetics; Life history; Life Sciences; Male; Males; Mate selection; Mating; Mating Preference, Animal; Phenotype; Phenotypes; Population genetics; Populations and Evolution; Reproduction; Reproductive Isolation; Sexual selection; Speciation; choosiness; reproductive isolation; Age; life history; speciation
• ISSN: 0014-3820; 1558-5646
• DOI: 10.1111/evo.14417

The strength of mate choice (choosiness) often varies with age, but theory to understand this variation is scarce. Additionally, theory has investigated the evolution of choosiness in speciation scenarios but has ignored that most organisms have overlapping generations. We investigate whether speciation can result in variation of choosiness with age, and whether such variation can in turn affect speciation. We develop a population‐genetic model of the evolution of choosiness in organisms with overlapping generations in the context of secondary contact between two divergent populations. We assume that females choose males that match their phenotype, such that choosiness evolves by sexual selection. We demonstrate that speciation can result in the evolution of age‐specific choosiness when the mating trait is under divergent ecological selection and age is not used as a mating cue. The cause of this result is that allele frequencies differ between choosy females and males. However, we find that the evolution of age‐specific choosiness does not affect the overall level of reproductive isolation compared to a case without age‐structure, supporting previous speciation theory. Overall, our results connect life history and speciation theory, and the mechanisms that we highlight have implications for the understanding of the role of sex‐specific selection in the evolution of choosiness.