Elbow reconstruction after excision of proximal ulna tumors: Challenges and solutions

• Published in: Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma Vol. 20; p. 101496
• Main Authors: Gulia, Ashish, Pruthi, Manish, Gupta, Srinath, Nadkarni, Shravan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.09.2021; Elsevier
• Subjects: Allograft; Autograft; Biological reconstruction; Elbow function; Endoprosthetic reconstruction; Review; Single bone forearm; Single bone forearm; Biological reconstruction; Autograft; Endoprosthetic reconstruction; Allograft; Elbow function
• ISSN: 0976-5662; 2213-3445
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101496

Most malignant bone tumors are treated with surgical excision, adhering to oncologic principles, followed by reconstruction to preserve form and function whenever feasible. Primary bone tumors around the elbow are rare accounting for <1% of all skeletal tumors. They pose a reconstructive challenge, due to the complex interplay between the osseous & capsulo-ligamentous structures which is essential for elbow stability and function. Tumors affecting the proximal ulna are rare and reconstruction of the defects following these tumors is extremely challenging. Various reconstruction options like arthrodesis, autogenous bone grafts, allografts, re-implantation of sterilized tumor bone, pseudoarthrosis, and endoprosthesis have been tried with variable success. However, due to lack of standardization and the rarity of the site, surgeons are often in a dilemma to choose the correct option. This can lead to suboptimal functional outcomes and long-term failures. In this article, we reviewed the published literature on proximal ulnar tumors and noted the pros and cons of various reconstructive procedures. We have also attempted to formulate reconstruction recommendations based on the level of resection of proximal ulna.