Low Limit for Effective Signal Strength in the Stratus OCT in Imperative Low Signal Strength Cases
To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the reproducibility of OCT scans by signal strength (SS). A total of 668 subjects were scanned for measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNF...
Saved in:
Published in | Korean journal of ophthalmology Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 182 - 188 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
The Korean Ophthalmological Society
01.06.2012
대한안과학회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1011-8942 2092-9382 2092-9382 |
DOI | 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182 |
Cover
Abstract | To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the reproducibility of OCT scans by signal strength (SS).
A total of 668 subjects were scanned for measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness using the Stratus OCT twice on the same day. The variability of overall RNFL thickness parameters obtained at different SS was analyzed and compared by repeated-measures of ANOVA and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and variability (standard deviation) of RNFL thickness were obtained. The false positive ratio was analyzed.
When SS was 3, the variability of RNFL thickness was significantly different (low ICC, high variability) in comparison to when SS was 4 or greater. Significant negative correlations were observed between variability in RNFL thickness and signal strength. The difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 (4.94 µm) and SS 6 (4.41 µm) was 0.53 µm.
Clinically, the difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 and SS 6 was quite small. High SS is important, however, when signal strength is low due to uncorrectable factors in patients in need of OCT for glaucoma and retinal disease. Our results suggest that SS 4 is the lowest acceptable limit of signal strength for obtaining reproducible scanning images. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the reproducibility of OCT scans by signal strength (SS).PURPOSETo determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the reproducibility of OCT scans by signal strength (SS).A total of 668 subjects were scanned for measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness using the Stratus OCT twice on the same day. The variability of overall RNFL thickness parameters obtained at different SS was analyzed and compared by repeated-measures of ANOVA and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and variability (standard deviation) of RNFL thickness were obtained. The false positive ratio was analyzed.METHODSA total of 668 subjects were scanned for measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness using the Stratus OCT twice on the same day. The variability of overall RNFL thickness parameters obtained at different SS was analyzed and compared by repeated-measures of ANOVA and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and variability (standard deviation) of RNFL thickness were obtained. The false positive ratio was analyzed.When SS was 3, the variability of RNFL thickness was significantly different (low ICC, high variability) in comparison to when SS was 4 or greater. Significant negative correlations were observed between variability in RNFL thickness and signal strength. The difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 (4.94 µm) and SS 6 (4.41 µm) was 0.53 µm.RESULTSWhen SS was 3, the variability of RNFL thickness was significantly different (low ICC, high variability) in comparison to when SS was 4 or greater. Significant negative correlations were observed between variability in RNFL thickness and signal strength. The difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 (4.94 µm) and SS 6 (4.41 µm) was 0.53 µm.Clinically, the difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 and SS 6 was quite small. High SS is important, however, when signal strength is low due to uncorrectable factors in patients in need of OCT for glaucoma and retinal disease. Our results suggest that SS 4 is the lowest acceptable limit of signal strength for obtaining reproducible scanning images.CONCLUSIONSClinically, the difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 and SS 6 was quite small. High SS is important, however, when signal strength is low due to uncorrectable factors in patients in need of OCT for glaucoma and retinal disease. Our results suggest that SS 4 is the lowest acceptable limit of signal strength for obtaining reproducible scanning images. Purpose: To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the reproducibility of OCT scans by signal strength (SS). Methods: A total of 668 subjects were scanned for measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness using the Stratus OCT twice on the same day. The variability of overall RNFL thickness parameters obtained at different SS was analyzed and compared by repeated-measures of ANOVA and Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and variability (standard deviation) of RNFL thickness were obtained. The false positive ratio was analyzed. Results: When SS was 3, the variability of RNFL thickness was significantly different (low ICC, high variability)in comparison to when SS was 4 or greater. Significant negative correlations were observed between variability in RNFL thickness and signal strength. The difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 (4.94 μm) and SS 6 (4.41 μm) was 0.53 μm. Conclusions: Clinically, the difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 and SS 6 was quite small. High SS is important, however, when signal strength is low due to uncorrectable factors in patients in need of OCT for glaucoma and retinal disease. Our results suggest that SS 4 is the lowest acceptable limit of signal strength for obtaining reproducible scanning images. KCI Citation Count: 1 To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the reproducibility of OCT scans by signal strength (SS). A total of 668 subjects were scanned for measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness using the Stratus OCT twice on the same day. The variability of overall RNFL thickness parameters obtained at different SS was analyzed and compared by repeated-measures of ANOVA and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and variability (standard deviation) of RNFL thickness were obtained. The false positive ratio was analyzed. When SS was 3, the variability of RNFL thickness was significantly different (low ICC, high variability) in comparison to when SS was 4 or greater. Significant negative correlations were observed between variability in RNFL thickness and signal strength. The difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 (4.94 µm) and SS 6 (4.41 µm) was 0.53 µm. Clinically, the difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 and SS 6 was quite small. High SS is important, however, when signal strength is low due to uncorrectable factors in patients in need of OCT for glaucoma and retinal disease. Our results suggest that SS 4 is the lowest acceptable limit of signal strength for obtaining reproducible scanning images. |
Author | Kim, Hyun Joong Park, Ki Ho Choi, Chul Young Kim, Martha Ha, Man Mook Kim, Joon Mo |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea 2 Department of Applied Statistics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea 4 Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea 3 Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Department of Applied Statistics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea – name: 3 Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – name: 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – name: 4 Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Man Mook surname: Ha fullname: Ha, Man Mook organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 2 givenname: Joon Mo surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Joon Mo organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 3 givenname: Hyun Joong surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Hyun Joong organization: Department of Applied Statistics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 4 givenname: Ki Ho surname: Park fullname: Park, Ki Ho organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea – sequence: 5 givenname: Martha surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Martha organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea – sequence: 6 givenname: Chul Young surname: Choi fullname: Choi, Chul Young organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22670074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001665733$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNp1kV9r2zAUxcXoWNNuH2Avw497sSddqZb1MiihWwOBwpo9C0W-StTYUmY5Lfv2k5t2fwp7ukg6v3PQPWfkJMSAhLxntOJcsE-7u1gBZVBBXfGKNfCKzIAqKBVv4ITMGGWsbJSAU3KW0h2lNeNUviGnALWkVIoZWS_jQ7H0vR8LF4fiyjm0o7_H4tZvgumK23HAsBm3hQ_FuMXpbMZDKm7mq-lq0e8xX0zAZPQSmpuE6S157UyX8N3TPCffv1yt5tfl8ubrYn65LC0XEkrZAsgL0xrGmLNGcdOqNahGrplrOHNMSFOjc0BFK6ipW4XCIQVmDOdoLD8nH4--YXB6Z72Oxj_OTdS7QV9-Wy20vKC8EVn6-SjdH9Y9thZD_lan94PvzfDzEfz3JfhttrnXnNdCgPqTtR_ijwOmUfc-Wew6EzAeks6bV1TVXNAs_fB31u-Q5w6yQB4FdogpDei09WPeaZyifZe99NS2zm3rqW0NteY6t51J9oJ8Nv8_8wvFFq3Q |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3341_kjo_2014_28_2_138 crossref_primary_10_1080_01658107_2019_1653934 crossref_primary_10_1167_tvst_11_5_11 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00417-009-1241-0 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01263.x 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.040 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31817eee20 10.1001/archopht.120.6.714 10.1167/iovs.06-0320 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212244.64584.c2 10.1080/02713680802579188 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.004 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01345.x 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.04.053 10.1136/bjo.2004.059824 10.1167/iovs.06-0921 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.015 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01602.x 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.07.050 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2007.01150.x 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.015 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01659.x 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.061 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.036 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01680.x 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.067 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1989.tb00751.x 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.11.027 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.12.020 10.1080/02713680600646882 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2012 The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2012 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2012 The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2012 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM ACYCR |
DOI | 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2092-9382 |
EndPage | 188 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_750384 PMC3364429 22670074 10_3341_kjo_2012_26_3_182 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- 29L 2WC 5-W 53G 5GY 8JR 8XY 9ZL AAYXX ACYCR ADBBV ADRAZ ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL CITATION CS3 DIK E3Z EBS EF. EJD F5P FRP GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HYE KQ8 M48 MZR O5R O5S OK1 P5Y P6G PGMZT RPM TR2 ZZE CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF HZB M~E NPM 7X8 85H 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3472-7d2275ada111fca93ad9b2987b1f831f147a6eff204d40a6d9e4fe021aa33eac3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1011-8942 2092-9382 |
IngestDate | Tue Nov 21 21:42:29 EST 2023 Thu Aug 21 17:30:02 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 04:26:38 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:42:21 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:57:27 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:51 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | Glaucoma Retinal nerve fiber layer Optic coherence tomography Variability Signal strength |
Language | English |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3472-7d2275ada111fca93ad9b2987b1f831f147a6eff204d40a6d9e4fe021aa33eac3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 G704-002170.2012.26.3.012 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182 |
PMID | 22670074 |
PQID | 1019096340 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_750384 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3364429 proquest_miscellaneous_1019096340 pubmed_primary_22670074 crossref_citationtrail_10_3341_kjo_2012_26_3_182 crossref_primary_10_3341_kjo_2012_26_3_182 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2012-Jun |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2012 text: 2012-Jun |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
PublicationTitle | Korean journal of ophthalmology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Korean J Ophthalmol |
PublicationYear | 2012 |
Publisher | The Korean Ophthalmological Society 대한안과학회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Korean Ophthalmological Society – name: 대한안과학회 |
References | Shah (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref25) 2006; 113 Gordon (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref12) 2002; 120 Cheung (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref8) 2008; 115 Katsanos (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref13) 2008; 86 Huang (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref23) 2007; 48 Huynh (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref19) 2006; 113 Ray (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref5) 2005; 139 Teikari (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref16) 1989; 67 Wu (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref27) 2009; 18 Larsson (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref1) 2011; 89 Helb (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref10) 2010; 88 Kim (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref26) 2007; 114 Patel (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref2) 2011; 89 Li (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref11) 2010; 248 Tsai (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref17) 2006; 141 Savini (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref7) 2006; 15 El-Ashry (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref6) 2006; 31 Fisher (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref24) 2006; 113 Eriksson (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref3) 2009; 87 Stein (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref4) 2006; 90 DeLeon Ortega (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref18) 2007; 48 Wu (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref28) 2007; 114 Salchow (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref21) 2006; 113 Youm (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref9) 2009; 34 Hougaard (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref15) 2008; 86 Yu (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref22) 2006; 142 Repka (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref20) 2009; 148 Iester (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref14) 2005 19706019 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;88(8):842-9 16949444 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1593-602 17367862 - Ophthalmology. 2007 Aug;114(8):1505-12 16714232 - Curr Eye Res. 2006 May;31(5):409-13 19878103 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;89(2):151-8 19327749 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;148(1):143-7 18616616 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;86(8):871-6 18577195 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Aug;86(5):569-75 18937816 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;87(7):725-30 18294689 - Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1347-51, 1351.e1-2 19295375 - J Glaucoma. 2009 Mar;18(3):213-6 16949443 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1583-92 17197539 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jan;48(1):244-50 16424531 - Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;90(2):186-90 16935594 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep;142(3):475-82 2786314 - Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1989 Apr;67(2):184-91 19172474 - Curr Eye Res. 2009 Jan;34(1):78-83 16406539 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):324-32 16865012 - J Glaucoma. 2006 Aug;15(4):336-40 16678526 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 May;141(5):970-2 17325159 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;48(3):1156-63 16650674 - Ophthalmology. 2006 May;113(5):786-91 19937335 - Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;248(3):429-34 15652824 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;139(1):18-29 17239441 - Ophthalmology. 2007 Jun;114(6):1053-7 12049575 - Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;120(6):714-20; discussion 829-30 19845557 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 May;89(3):229-34 |
References_xml | – volume: 248 start-page: 429 year: 2010 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref11 publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1241-0 – volume: 86 start-page: 569 year: 2008 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref15 publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01263.x – volume: 113 start-page: 324 year: 2006 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref24 publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.040 – volume: 18 start-page: 213 year: 2009 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref27 publication-title: J Glaucoma doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31817eee20 – volume: 120 start-page: 714 year: 2002 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref12 publication-title: Arch Ophthalmol doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.6.714 – volume: 48 start-page: 244 year: 2007 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref23 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0320 – volume: 15 start-page: 336 year: 2006 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref7 publication-title: J Glaucoma doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212244.64584.c2 – volume: 34 start-page: 78 year: 2009 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref9 publication-title: Curr Eye Res doi: 10.1080/02713680802579188 – volume: 113 start-page: 1593 year: 2006 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref25 publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.004 – volume: 87 start-page: 725 year: 2009 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref3 publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01345.x – volume: 142 start-page: 475 year: 2006 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref22 publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.04.053 – volume: 90 start-page: 186 year: 2006 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref4 publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.059824 – volume: 48 start-page: 1156 year: 2007 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref18 publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0921 – volume: 148 start-page: 143 year: 2009 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref20 publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.015 – volume: 88 start-page: 842 year: 2010 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref10 publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01602.x – volume: 139 start-page: 18 year: 2005 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref5 publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.07.050 – volume: 86 start-page: 871 year: 2008 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref13 publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2007.01150.x – start-page: 121 volume-title: Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fibre analysis year: 2005 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref14 – volume: 114 start-page: 1053 year: 2007 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref26 publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.015 – volume: 89 start-page: 229 year: 2011 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref2 publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01659.x – volume: 114 start-page: 1505 year: 2007 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref28 publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.061 – volume: 113 start-page: 786 year: 2006 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref21 publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.036 – volume: 89 start-page: 151 year: 2011 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref1 publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01680.x – volume: 113 start-page: 1583 year: 2006 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref19 publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.067 – volume: 67 start-page: 184 year: 1989 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref16 publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1989.tb00751.x – volume: 115 start-page: 1347 year: 2008 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref8 publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.11.027 – volume: 141 start-page: 970 year: 2006 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref17 publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.12.020 – volume: 31 start-page: 409 year: 2006 ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref6 publication-title: Curr Eye Res doi: 10.1080/02713680600646882 – reference: 16650674 - Ophthalmology. 2006 May;113(5):786-91 – reference: 15652824 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;139(1):18-29 – reference: 16424531 - Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;90(2):186-90 – reference: 16678526 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 May;141(5):970-2 – reference: 16714232 - Curr Eye Res. 2006 May;31(5):409-13 – reference: 18937816 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;87(7):725-30 – reference: 19878103 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;89(2):151-8 – reference: 18294689 - Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1347-51, 1351.e1-2 – reference: 19937335 - Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;248(3):429-34 – reference: 17367862 - Ophthalmology. 2007 Aug;114(8):1505-12 – reference: 17239441 - Ophthalmology. 2007 Jun;114(6):1053-7 – reference: 16935594 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep;142(3):475-82 – reference: 18616616 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;86(8):871-6 – reference: 16949444 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1593-602 – reference: 17197539 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jan;48(1):244-50 – reference: 17325159 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;48(3):1156-63 – reference: 19327749 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;148(1):143-7 – reference: 18577195 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Aug;86(5):569-75 – reference: 19295375 - J Glaucoma. 2009 Mar;18(3):213-6 – reference: 19706019 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;88(8):842-9 – reference: 16949443 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1583-92 – reference: 2786314 - Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1989 Apr;67(2):184-91 – reference: 19172474 - Curr Eye Res. 2009 Jan;34(1):78-83 – reference: 12049575 - Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;120(6):714-20; discussion 829-30 – reference: 16865012 - J Glaucoma. 2006 Aug;15(4):336-40 – reference: 16406539 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):324-32 – reference: 19845557 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 May;89(3):229-34 |
SSID | ssj0061307 |
Score | 1.8936867 |
Snippet | To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the... Purpose: To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we... |
SourceID | nrf pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 182 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Cross-Sectional Studies Diagnosis, Differential Disease Progression False Positive Reactions Female Glaucoma - complications Glaucoma - diagnosis Humans Male Original Prospective Studies Reproducibility of Results Retinal Diseases - diagnosis Retinal Diseases - etiology Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology 안과학 |
Title | Low Limit for Effective Signal Strength in the Stratus OCT in Imperative Low Signal Strength Cases |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22670074 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1019096340 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3364429 https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001665733 |
Volume | 26 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Korean Journal of Ophthalmology, 2012, 26(3), , pp.182-188 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELe2IU28IGADykflSXtCSnFsx44fEEIV0wrr9sAq7c1yYrsrnVLoh4D_nrskrehU8cBTJMfnKD7b9zuf_TtCTjMWgwleJTlY50SWLk9cLlhSMCdVYDHz9dbF8FKdj-Tnm-xmj6zTW7UduNjp2mE-qdH8rvfrx-8PMOHfo8cJi_C76Te8xZfyHlc90QPAvE8egGFS6IsN5SaogEi5zrWCu4K5kbwJcu5uAkmCOV5h0XLLYu1X87gLjN4_U_mXkTp7TB616JJ-bIbDE7IXqqfkcNjGz49IcTH7Ses7TRTAKm2oi2G9o18nYxTEGHU1Xt7SSUUBGdKau3a1oFf9aywaAMZumMIpNnRfqA8WcXFMRmefrvvnSZtlISmF1ACvPec6c97BqhdLZ4TzpuAm10Uac5HGVGqnQoycSS-ZU94EGQNAA-eEgGVbPCMH1awKLwg1SuvUM1fmWZAemd8DVxyKNPeyiKZD2LonbdlSkGMmjDsLrgjqwYIeLOrBcmWFBT10yNuNyPeGf-NflU9APXZaTiyyZuNzPLPTuQXfYGAxYptLqLNWnoWZhOERV4XZaoGH3Qw4dEKyDnneKHPzyfVY6BC9peZNBfze9ptqcluzdQsBkJObl_8t-Yo8xL9szqe9JgfL-Sq8ASS0LLrgAwy-dOt9hG491v8AOuMHOA |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low+Limit+for+Effective+Signal+Strength+in+the+Stratus+OCT+in+Imperative+Low+Signal+Strength+Cases&rft.jtitle=Korean+journal+of+ophthalmology&rft.au=Ha%2C+Man+Mook&rft.au=Kim%2C+Joon+Mo&rft.au=Kim%2C+Hyun+Joong&rft.au=Park%2C+Ki+Ho&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.pub=The+Korean+Ophthalmological+Society&rft.issn=1011-8942&rft.eissn=2092-9382&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=188&rft_id=info:doi/10.3341%2Fkjo.2012.26.3.182&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22670074&rft.externalDocID=PMC3364429 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon |