Low Limit for Effective Signal Strength in the Stratus OCT in Imperative Low Signal Strength Cases

To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the reproducibility of OCT scans by signal strength (SS). A total of 668 subjects were scanned for measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNF...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKorean journal of ophthalmology Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 182 - 188
Main Authors Ha, Man Mook, Kim, Joon Mo, Kim, Hyun Joong, Park, Ki Ho, Kim, Martha, Choi, Chul Young
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) The Korean Ophthalmological Society 01.06.2012
대한안과학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1011-8942
2092-9382
2092-9382
DOI10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182

Cover

Abstract To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the reproducibility of OCT scans by signal strength (SS). A total of 668 subjects were scanned for measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness using the Stratus OCT twice on the same day. The variability of overall RNFL thickness parameters obtained at different SS was analyzed and compared by repeated-measures of ANOVA and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and variability (standard deviation) of RNFL thickness were obtained. The false positive ratio was analyzed. When SS was 3, the variability of RNFL thickness was significantly different (low ICC, high variability) in comparison to when SS was 4 or greater. Significant negative correlations were observed between variability in RNFL thickness and signal strength. The difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 (4.94 µm) and SS 6 (4.41 µm) was 0.53 µm. Clinically, the difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 and SS 6 was quite small. High SS is important, however, when signal strength is low due to uncorrectable factors in patients in need of OCT for glaucoma and retinal disease. Our results suggest that SS 4 is the lowest acceptable limit of signal strength for obtaining reproducible scanning images.
AbstractList To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the reproducibility of OCT scans by signal strength (SS).PURPOSETo determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the reproducibility of OCT scans by signal strength (SS).A total of 668 subjects were scanned for measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness using the Stratus OCT twice on the same day. The variability of overall RNFL thickness parameters obtained at different SS was analyzed and compared by repeated-measures of ANOVA and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and variability (standard deviation) of RNFL thickness were obtained. The false positive ratio was analyzed.METHODSA total of 668 subjects were scanned for measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness using the Stratus OCT twice on the same day. The variability of overall RNFL thickness parameters obtained at different SS was analyzed and compared by repeated-measures of ANOVA and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and variability (standard deviation) of RNFL thickness were obtained. The false positive ratio was analyzed.When SS was 3, the variability of RNFL thickness was significantly different (low ICC, high variability) in comparison to when SS was 4 or greater. Significant negative correlations were observed between variability in RNFL thickness and signal strength. The difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 (4.94 µm) and SS 6 (4.41 µm) was 0.53 µm.RESULTSWhen SS was 3, the variability of RNFL thickness was significantly different (low ICC, high variability) in comparison to when SS was 4 or greater. Significant negative correlations were observed between variability in RNFL thickness and signal strength. The difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 (4.94 µm) and SS 6 (4.41 µm) was 0.53 µm.Clinically, the difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 and SS 6 was quite small. High SS is important, however, when signal strength is low due to uncorrectable factors in patients in need of OCT for glaucoma and retinal disease. Our results suggest that SS 4 is the lowest acceptable limit of signal strength for obtaining reproducible scanning images.CONCLUSIONSClinically, the difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 and SS 6 was quite small. High SS is important, however, when signal strength is low due to uncorrectable factors in patients in need of OCT for glaucoma and retinal disease. Our results suggest that SS 4 is the lowest acceptable limit of signal strength for obtaining reproducible scanning images.
Purpose: To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the reproducibility of OCT scans by signal strength (SS). Methods: A total of 668 subjects were scanned for measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness using the Stratus OCT twice on the same day. The variability of overall RNFL thickness parameters obtained at different SS was analyzed and compared by repeated-measures of ANOVA and Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and variability (standard deviation) of RNFL thickness were obtained. The false positive ratio was analyzed. Results: When SS was 3, the variability of RNFL thickness was significantly different (low ICC, high variability)in comparison to when SS was 4 or greater. Significant negative correlations were observed between variability in RNFL thickness and signal strength. The difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 (4.94 μm) and SS 6 (4.41 μm) was 0.53 μm. Conclusions: Clinically, the difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 and SS 6 was quite small. High SS is important, however, when signal strength is low due to uncorrectable factors in patients in need of OCT for glaucoma and retinal disease. Our results suggest that SS 4 is the lowest acceptable limit of signal strength for obtaining reproducible scanning images. KCI Citation Count: 1
To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the reproducibility of OCT scans by signal strength (SS). A total of 668 subjects were scanned for measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness using the Stratus OCT twice on the same day. The variability of overall RNFL thickness parameters obtained at different SS was analyzed and compared by repeated-measures of ANOVA and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Values of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and variability (standard deviation) of RNFL thickness were obtained. The false positive ratio was analyzed. When SS was 3, the variability of RNFL thickness was significantly different (low ICC, high variability) in comparison to when SS was 4 or greater. Significant negative correlations were observed between variability in RNFL thickness and signal strength. The difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 (4.94 µm) and SS 6 (4.41 µm) was 0.53 µm. Clinically, the difference of variability of average RNFL thickness between SS 4 and SS 6 was quite small. High SS is important, however, when signal strength is low due to uncorrectable factors in patients in need of OCT for glaucoma and retinal disease. Our results suggest that SS 4 is the lowest acceptable limit of signal strength for obtaining reproducible scanning images.
Author Kim, Hyun Joong
Park, Ki Ho
Choi, Chul Young
Kim, Martha
Ha, Man Mook
Kim, Joon Mo
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
2 Department of Applied Statistics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
4 Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
3 Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Department of Applied Statistics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
– name: 3 Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– name: 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– name: 4 Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Man Mook
  surname: Ha
  fullname: Ha, Man Mook
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Joon Mo
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Joon Mo
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hyun Joong
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Hyun Joong
  organization: Department of Applied Statistics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ki Ho
  surname: Park
  fullname: Park, Ki Ho
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Martha
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Martha
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Chul Young
  surname: Choi
  fullname: Choi, Chul Young
  organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22670074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001665733$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp1kV9r2zAUxcXoWNNuH2Avw497sSddqZb1MiihWwOBwpo9C0W-StTYUmY5Lfv2k5t2fwp7ukg6v3PQPWfkJMSAhLxntOJcsE-7u1gBZVBBXfGKNfCKzIAqKBVv4ITMGGWsbJSAU3KW0h2lNeNUviGnALWkVIoZWS_jQ7H0vR8LF4fiyjm0o7_H4tZvgumK23HAsBm3hQ_FuMXpbMZDKm7mq-lq0e8xX0zAZPQSmpuE6S157UyX8N3TPCffv1yt5tfl8ubrYn65LC0XEkrZAsgL0xrGmLNGcdOqNahGrplrOHNMSFOjc0BFK6ipW4XCIQVmDOdoLD8nH4--YXB6Z72Oxj_OTdS7QV9-Wy20vKC8EVn6-SjdH9Y9thZD_lan94PvzfDzEfz3JfhttrnXnNdCgPqTtR_ijwOmUfc-Wew6EzAeks6bV1TVXNAs_fB31u-Q5w6yQB4FdogpDei09WPeaZyifZe99NS2zm3rqW0NteY6t51J9oJ8Nv8_8wvFFq3Q
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3341_kjo_2014_28_2_138
crossref_primary_10_1080_01658107_2019_1653934
crossref_primary_10_1167_tvst_11_5_11
Cites_doi 10.1007/s00417-009-1241-0
10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01263.x
10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.040
10.1097/IJG.0b013e31817eee20
10.1001/archopht.120.6.714
10.1167/iovs.06-0320
10.1097/01.ijg.0000212244.64584.c2
10.1080/02713680802579188
10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.004
10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01345.x
10.1016/j.ajo.2006.04.053
10.1136/bjo.2004.059824
10.1167/iovs.06-0921
10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.015
10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01602.x
10.1016/j.ajo.2004.07.050
10.1111/j.1755-3768.2007.01150.x
10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.015
10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01659.x
10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.061
10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.036
10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01680.x
10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.067
10.1111/j.1755-3768.1989.tb00751.x
10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.11.027
10.1016/j.ajo.2005.12.020
10.1080/02713680600646882
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2012 The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2012
Copyright_xml – notice: 2012 The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2012
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ACYCR
DOI 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2092-9382
EndPage 188
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_750384
PMC3364429
22670074
10_3341_kjo_2012_26_3_182
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
29L
2WC
5-W
53G
5GY
8JR
8XY
9ZL
AAYXX
ACYCR
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
CITATION
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EF.
EJD
F5P
FRP
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
KQ8
M48
MZR
O5R
O5S
OK1
P5Y
P6G
PGMZT
RPM
TR2
ZZE
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
HZB
M~E
NPM
7X8
85H
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3472-7d2275ada111fca93ad9b2987b1f831f147a6eff204d40a6d9e4fe021aa33eac3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1011-8942
2092-9382
IngestDate Tue Nov 21 21:42:29 EST 2023
Thu Aug 21 17:30:02 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 04:26:38 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:42:21 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:57:27 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:51 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Glaucoma
Retinal nerve fiber layer
Optic coherence tomography
Variability
Signal strength
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3472-7d2275ada111fca93ad9b2987b1f831f147a6eff204d40a6d9e4fe021aa33eac3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
G704-002170.2012.26.3.012
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182
PMID 22670074
PQID 1019096340
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_750384
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3364429
proquest_miscellaneous_1019096340
pubmed_primary_22670074
crossref_citationtrail_10_3341_kjo_2012_26_3_182
crossref_primary_10_3341_kjo_2012_26_3_182
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012-Jun
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2012
  text: 2012-Jun
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Korean journal of ophthalmology
PublicationTitleAlternate Korean J Ophthalmol
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
대한안과학회
Publisher_xml – name: The Korean Ophthalmological Society
– name: 대한안과학회
References Shah (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref25) 2006; 113
Gordon (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref12) 2002; 120
Cheung (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref8) 2008; 115
Katsanos (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref13) 2008; 86
Huang (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref23) 2007; 48
Huynh (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref19) 2006; 113
Ray (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref5) 2005; 139
Teikari (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref16) 1989; 67
Wu (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref27) 2009; 18
Larsson (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref1) 2011; 89
Helb (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref10) 2010; 88
Kim (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref26) 2007; 114
Patel (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref2) 2011; 89
Li (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref11) 2010; 248
Tsai (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref17) 2006; 141
Savini (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref7) 2006; 15
El-Ashry (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref6) 2006; 31
Fisher (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref24) 2006; 113
Eriksson (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref3) 2009; 87
Stein (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref4) 2006; 90
DeLeon Ortega (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref18) 2007; 48
Wu (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref28) 2007; 114
Salchow (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref21) 2006; 113
Youm (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref9) 2009; 34
Hougaard (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref15) 2008; 86
Yu (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref22) 2006; 142
Repka (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref20) 2009; 148
Iester (10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref14) 2005
19706019 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;88(8):842-9
16949444 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1593-602
17367862 - Ophthalmology. 2007 Aug;114(8):1505-12
16714232 - Curr Eye Res. 2006 May;31(5):409-13
19878103 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;89(2):151-8
19327749 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;148(1):143-7
18616616 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;86(8):871-6
18577195 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Aug;86(5):569-75
18937816 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;87(7):725-30
18294689 - Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1347-51, 1351.e1-2
19295375 - J Glaucoma. 2009 Mar;18(3):213-6
16949443 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1583-92
17197539 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jan;48(1):244-50
16424531 - Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;90(2):186-90
16935594 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep;142(3):475-82
2786314 - Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1989 Apr;67(2):184-91
19172474 - Curr Eye Res. 2009 Jan;34(1):78-83
16406539 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):324-32
16865012 - J Glaucoma. 2006 Aug;15(4):336-40
16678526 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 May;141(5):970-2
17325159 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;48(3):1156-63
16650674 - Ophthalmology. 2006 May;113(5):786-91
19937335 - Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;248(3):429-34
15652824 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;139(1):18-29
17239441 - Ophthalmology. 2007 Jun;114(6):1053-7
12049575 - Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;120(6):714-20; discussion 829-30
19845557 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 May;89(3):229-34
References_xml – volume: 248
  start-page: 429
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref11
  publication-title: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1241-0
– volume: 86
  start-page: 569
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref15
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01263.x
– volume: 113
  start-page: 324
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref24
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.040
– volume: 18
  start-page: 213
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref27
  publication-title: J Glaucoma
  doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31817eee20
– volume: 120
  start-page: 714
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref12
  publication-title: Arch Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.6.714
– volume: 48
  start-page: 244
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref23
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0320
– volume: 15
  start-page: 336
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref7
  publication-title: J Glaucoma
  doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212244.64584.c2
– volume: 34
  start-page: 78
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref9
  publication-title: Curr Eye Res
  doi: 10.1080/02713680802579188
– volume: 113
  start-page: 1593
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref25
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.004
– volume: 87
  start-page: 725
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref3
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01345.x
– volume: 142
  start-page: 475
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref22
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.04.053
– volume: 90
  start-page: 186
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref4
  publication-title: Br J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.059824
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1156
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref18
  publication-title: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
  doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0921
– volume: 148
  start-page: 143
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref20
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.01.015
– volume: 88
  start-page: 842
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref10
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01602.x
– volume: 139
  start-page: 18
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref5
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.07.050
– volume: 86
  start-page: 871
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref13
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2007.01150.x
– start-page: 121
  volume-title: Optic nerve head and retinal nerve fibre analysis
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref14
– volume: 114
  start-page: 1053
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref26
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.015
– volume: 89
  start-page: 229
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref2
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01659.x
– volume: 114
  start-page: 1505
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref28
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.10.061
– volume: 113
  start-page: 786
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref21
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.036
– volume: 89
  start-page: 151
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref1
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01680.x
– volume: 113
  start-page: 1583
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref19
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.067
– volume: 67
  start-page: 184
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref16
  publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)
  doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1989.tb00751.x
– volume: 115
  start-page: 1347
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref8
  publication-title: Ophthalmology
  doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.11.027
– volume: 141
  start-page: 970
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref17
  publication-title: Am J Ophthalmol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.12.020
– volume: 31
  start-page: 409
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.3341/kjo.2012.26.3.182_ref6
  publication-title: Curr Eye Res
  doi: 10.1080/02713680600646882
– reference: 16650674 - Ophthalmology. 2006 May;113(5):786-91
– reference: 15652824 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan;139(1):18-29
– reference: 16424531 - Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;90(2):186-90
– reference: 16678526 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 May;141(5):970-2
– reference: 16714232 - Curr Eye Res. 2006 May;31(5):409-13
– reference: 18937816 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;87(7):725-30
– reference: 19878103 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;89(2):151-8
– reference: 18294689 - Ophthalmology. 2008 Aug;115(8):1347-51, 1351.e1-2
– reference: 19937335 - Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;248(3):429-34
– reference: 17367862 - Ophthalmology. 2007 Aug;114(8):1505-12
– reference: 17239441 - Ophthalmology. 2007 Jun;114(6):1053-7
– reference: 16935594 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep;142(3):475-82
– reference: 18616616 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Dec;86(8):871-6
– reference: 16949444 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1593-602
– reference: 17197539 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jan;48(1):244-50
– reference: 17325159 - Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Mar;48(3):1156-63
– reference: 19327749 - Am J Ophthalmol. 2009 Jul;148(1):143-7
– reference: 18577195 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2008 Aug;86(5):569-75
– reference: 19295375 - J Glaucoma. 2009 Mar;18(3):213-6
– reference: 19706019 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;88(8):842-9
– reference: 16949443 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1583-92
– reference: 2786314 - Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1989 Apr;67(2):184-91
– reference: 19172474 - Curr Eye Res. 2009 Jan;34(1):78-83
– reference: 12049575 - Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;120(6):714-20; discussion 829-30
– reference: 16865012 - J Glaucoma. 2006 Aug;15(4):336-40
– reference: 16406539 - Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):324-32
– reference: 19845557 - Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 May;89(3):229-34
SSID ssj0061307
Score 1.8936867
Snippet To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we investigated the...
Purpose: To determine the lowest limit of signal strength that is still effective for accurate analysis of optic coherence tomography (OCT) values, we...
SourceID nrf
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 182
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diagnosis, Differential
Disease Progression
False Positive Reactions
Female
Glaucoma - complications
Glaucoma - diagnosis
Humans
Male
Original
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Retinal Diseases - diagnosis
Retinal Diseases - etiology
Retinal Ganglion Cells - pathology
안과학
Title Low Limit for Effective Signal Strength in the Stratus OCT in Imperative Low Signal Strength Cases
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22670074
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1019096340
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3364429
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001665733
Volume 26
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Korean Journal of Ophthalmology, 2012, 26(3), , pp.182-188
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELe2IU28IGADykflSXtCSnFsx44fEEIV0wrr9sAq7c1yYrsrnVLoh4D_nrskrehU8cBTJMfnKD7b9zuf_TtCTjMWgwleJTlY50SWLk9cLlhSMCdVYDHz9dbF8FKdj-Tnm-xmj6zTW7UduNjp2mE-qdH8rvfrx-8PMOHfo8cJi_C76Te8xZfyHlc90QPAvE8egGFS6IsN5SaogEi5zrWCu4K5kbwJcu5uAkmCOV5h0XLLYu1X87gLjN4_U_mXkTp7TB616JJ-bIbDE7IXqqfkcNjGz49IcTH7Ses7TRTAKm2oi2G9o18nYxTEGHU1Xt7SSUUBGdKau3a1oFf9aywaAMZumMIpNnRfqA8WcXFMRmefrvvnSZtlISmF1ACvPec6c97BqhdLZ4TzpuAm10Uac5HGVGqnQoycSS-ZU94EGQNAA-eEgGVbPCMH1awKLwg1SuvUM1fmWZAemd8DVxyKNPeyiKZD2LonbdlSkGMmjDsLrgjqwYIeLOrBcmWFBT10yNuNyPeGf-NflU9APXZaTiyyZuNzPLPTuQXfYGAxYptLqLNWnoWZhOERV4XZaoGH3Qw4dEKyDnneKHPzyfVY6BC9peZNBfze9ptqcluzdQsBkJObl_8t-Yo8xL9szqe9JgfL-Sq8ASS0LLrgAwy-dOt9hG491v8AOuMHOA
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low+Limit+for+Effective+Signal+Strength+in+the+Stratus+OCT+in+Imperative+Low+Signal+Strength+Cases&rft.jtitle=Korean+journal+of+ophthalmology&rft.au=Ha%2C+Man+Mook&rft.au=Kim%2C+Joon+Mo&rft.au=Kim%2C+Hyun+Joong&rft.au=Park%2C+Ki+Ho&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.pub=The+Korean+Ophthalmological+Society&rft.issn=1011-8942&rft.eissn=2092-9382&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=188&rft_id=info:doi/10.3341%2Fkjo.2012.26.3.182&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F22670074&rft.externalDocID=PMC3364429
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1011-8942&client=summon