Diagnosis of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia Proposed Modification of the Task Force Criteria

Background— In 1994, an International Task Force proposed criteria for the clinical diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) that facilitated recognition and interpretation of the frequently nonspecific clinical features of ARVC/D. This enabled confirmatory cli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 121; no. 13; pp. 1533 - 1541
Main Authors Marcus, Frank I., McKenna, William J., Sherrill, Duane, Basso, Cristina, Bauce, Barbara, Bluemke, David A., Calkins, Hugh, Corrado, Domenico, Cox, Moniek G.P.J., Daubert, James P., Fontaine, Guy, Gear, Kathleen, Hauer, Richard, Nava, Andrea, Picard, Michael H., Protonotarios, Nikos, Saffitz, Jeffrey E., Sanborn, Danita M. Yoerger, Steinberg, Jonathan S., Tandri, Harikrishna, Thiene, Gaetano, Towbin, Jeffrey A., Tsatsopoulou, Adalena, Wichter, Thomas, Zareba, Wojciech
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hagerstown, MD Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 06.04.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background— In 1994, an International Task Force proposed criteria for the clinical diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) that facilitated recognition and interpretation of the frequently nonspecific clinical features of ARVC/D. This enabled confirmatory clinical diagnosis in index cases through exclusion of phenocopies and provided a standard on which clinical research and genetic studies could be based. Structural, histological, electrocardiographic, arrhythmic, and familial features of the disease were incorporated into the criteria, subdivided into major and minor categories according to the specificity of their association with ARVC/D. At that time, clinical experience with ARVC/D was dominated by symptomatic index cases and sudden cardiac death victims—the overt or severe end of the disease spectrum. Consequently, the 1994 criteria were highly specific but lacked sensitivity for early and familial disease. Methods and Results— Revision of the diagnostic criteria provides guidance on the role of emerging diagnostic modalities and advances in the genetics of ARVC/D. The criteria have been modified to incorporate new knowledge and technology to improve diagnostic sensitivity, but with the important requisite of maintaining diagnostic specificity. The approach of classifying structural, histological, electrocardiographic, arrhythmic, and genetic features of the disease as major and minor criteria has been maintained. In this modification of the Task Force criteria, quantitative criteria are proposed and abnormalities are defined on the basis of comparison with normal subject data. Conclusions— The present modifications of the Task Force Criteria represent a working framework to improve the diagnosis and management of this condition. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00024505.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.840827