Thermodegradative and morphological behavior of composites of HDPE with surface-treated hydroxyapatite

In the present work, the thermodegradative and morphological behavior of composites of high-density polyethylene and surface-treated hydroxyapatite (HDPE/HA) were studied. Composites were prepared with HDPE, 30 wt% of HA and 2 phr of an ethylene–acrylic acid copolymer (20 wt% of acrylic acid) (EAA)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPolymer bulletin (Berlin, Germany) Vol. 64; no. 1; pp. 67 - 79
Main Authors Albano, Carmen, Cataño, L., Perera, R., Karam, A., González, G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer-Verlag 2010
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In the present work, the thermodegradative and morphological behavior of composites of high-density polyethylene and surface-treated hydroxyapatite (HDPE/HA) were studied. Composites were prepared with HDPE, 30 wt% of HA and 2 phr of an ethylene–acrylic acid copolymer (20 wt% of acrylic acid) (EAA) and melt-blended in an internal mixer at 160 °C and 50 rpm. Two sets of composites filled with different surface-treated hydroxyapatite (STHA) were prepared: one HA sample was pretreated with ethylene–acrylic acid copolymer (STHA 1 ) and the other one with acrylic acid (STHA 2 ). Thermogravimetric analyses were carried out to evaluate the thermal stability of the composites. The activation energies (Ea) were determined using a numerical method based on the Invariant Kinetic Parameters (IKP). The thermal decomposition of the HDPE/HA composites showed an Ea value of 330 kJ/mol. On the other hand, HDPE/HA/EAA and HDPE/STHA 1 composites showed a sudden decrease in Ea (272 and 270 kJ/mol, respectively). The HDPE/STHA 2 composite exhibited an Ea value of 313 kJ/mol, slightly lower than that of the HDPE/HA composite. Additionally, with the presence of EAA copolymer and acrylic acid in the composites, the nucleation and nucleus growth kinetic-model probabilities decreased compared to those of the HDPE/HA composite. However, there was an increase in the probability of the reaction order of the model. This behavior could be attributed to the morphology of the composites and to the addition of a less thermally stable component, i.e. EAA copolymer and acrylic acid. On the other hand, due to the interaction polymer/surface-treated filler, an increase in the Young Modulus and the tensile strength was observed.
ISSN:0170-0839
1436-2449
DOI:10.1007/s00289-009-0140-1