Psychometric validity of the distress thermometer and problem check list in ART-naïve HIV infected patients in Northern Nigeria

HIV diagnosis comes with a lot of worry and distress. Ability to objectively estimate this distress by non-psychiatrist will enhance early detection of psychological distress for intervention. To investigate the validity of the Distress Thermometer (DT) and its problem checklist in achieving early d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAfrican health sciences Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 3172 - 3180
Main Authors Obiajulu, Victor Olisah, Abiola, Tajudeen, Izehinosen, Christopher Okpataku, Obiako, Reginald O, Aveka, Ishaq Audu, Adam, Bashir Yakasai, Lateef, Taiwo Sheikh
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Uganda Makerere Medical School 01.12.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:HIV diagnosis comes with a lot of worry and distress. Ability to objectively estimate this distress by non-psychiatrist will enhance early detection of psychological distress for intervention. To investigate the validity of the Distress Thermometer (DT) and its problem checklist in achieving early detection of mental distress among ART-naïve HIV infected patient. A total of 90 ART-naïve HIV infected patients completed the DT and its problem check list, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), Oslo Social Support Scale and the 14-item Resilience Scale. The DT was positively correlated with all the measures of distress and reversely correlated with all the positive wellness in this study. The correlations were only significant for the negative measures of psychological wellness. The internal consistency of the DT's problem list overall and sub-categories were within acceptable range (i.e. α > 0.50). The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and Area Under the Curves (AUC) analysis were significant and found the DT and Problem List to respectively differentiate between cases of distress, anxiety and depression. The DT's cut-off was >5.0 with AUC range (0.754 - 0.709); sensitivity range (81.0% - 70.4%); specificity range (68.3% - 65.2%) for distress, anxiety and depression as determined by HADS. And the Problem List cut-off was >6.0 with AUC range (0.854 - 0.821); sensitivity range (90.5% - 85.7%); specificity range (68.3% - 65.2%) for distress, anxiety and depression as measured by HADS. The DT and Problem List were found to be valid measures of distress in ART-naïve HIV infected patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1680-6905
1729-0503
1729-0503
1680-6905
DOI:10.4314/ahs.v19i4.40