Mammals, agri-environment schemes and set-aside - what are the putative benefits

1. The impacts of agricultural intensification on farmland wildlife have been the subject of increasing concern, particularly over the last two decades. Population declines have occurred for a number of mammalian species, sometimes drastically so, and changes in farming practice are believed to be s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMammal review Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 259 - 277
Main Authors MACDONALD, D.W, TATTERSALL, F.H, SERVICE, K.M, FIRBANK, L.G, FEBER, R.E
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.10.2007
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract 1. The impacts of agricultural intensification on farmland wildlife have been the subject of increasing concern, particularly over the last two decades. Population declines have occurred for a number of mammalian species, sometimes drastically so, and changes in farming practice are believed to be significant contributory factors. 2. The major policy instruments for delivering environmental benefits on farmland are agri-environment schemes. These encourage farmers to adopt more environmentally sensitive farming practices to promote farmland biodiversity. Additionally, compulsory set-aside, which reduces agricultural surplus, could also have positive impacts on wildlife. In this paper we consider some of the putative benefits of agri-environment schemes and set-aside for mammals. 3. We review how establishment and management options within agri-environment schemes and set-aside might affect habitat resources for mammals. For example, conservation headlands increase plant and invertebrate resources within the crop edge for mammals such as wood mice. Grassy field margins can support communities of smaller mammals, and hedgerows may act as important commuting and hunting routes. Their potential will depend on factors such as seed mixtures used, timing and severity of cutting, and length of time they have been in place. 4. At a farm level, habitat heterogeneity may be increased through organic agriculture, which is supported by some agri-environment schemes. Studies suggest significant benefits to mammals, including wood mice and bats. However, it is increasingly recognized that effective conservation of farmland mammals must seek solutions at the landscape scale, addressing such issues as habitat connectivity between farms. One approach may be the better targeting of scheme agreements. 5. We suggest that agri-environment schemes and set-aside can contribute to the conservation of mammals on farmland. Recent policy changes are likely to have further positive impacts on farmland wildlife but appropriate mammal monitoring programmes must be developed rigorously to assess their effects.
AbstractList 1. The impacts of agricultural intensification on farmland wildlife have been the subject of increasing concern, particularly over the last two decades. Population declines have occurred for a number of mammalian species, sometimes drastically so, and changes in farming practice are believed to be significant contributory factors. 2. The major policy instruments for delivering environmental benefits on farmland are agri-environment schemes. These encourage farmers to adopt more environmentally sensitive farming practices to promote farmland biodiversity. Additionally, compulsory set-aside, which reduces agricultural surplus, could also have positive impacts on wildlife. In this paper we consider some of the putative benefits of agri-environment schemes and set-aside for mammals. 3. We review how establishment and management options within agri-environment schemes and set-aside might affect habitat resources for mammals. For example, conservation headlands increase plant and invertebrate resources within the crop edge for mammals such as wood mice. Grassy field margins can support communities of smaller mammals, and hedgerows may act as important commuting and hunting routes. Their potential will depend on factors such as seed mixtures used, timing and severity of cutting, and length of time they have been in place. 4. At a farm level, habitat heterogeneity may be increased through organic agriculture, which is supported by some agri-environment schemes. Studies suggest significant benefits to mammals, including wood mice and bats. However, it is increasingly recognized that effective conservation of farmland mammals must seek solutions at the landscape scale, addressing such issues as habitat connectivity between farms. One approach may be the better targeting of scheme agreements. 5. We suggest that agri-environment schemes and set-aside can contribute to the conservation of mammals on farmland. Recent policy changes are likely to have further positive impacts on farmland wildlife but appropriate mammal monitoring programmes must be developed rigorously to assess their effects.
ABSTRACT 1 The impacts of agricultural intensification on farmland wildlife have been the subject of increasing concern, particularly over the last two decades. Population declines have occurred for a number of mammalian species, sometimes drastically so, and changes in farming practice are believed to be significant contributory factors. 2 The major policy instruments for delivering environmental benefits on farmland are agri‐environment schemes. These encourage farmers to adopt more environmentally sensitive farming practices to promote farmland biodiversity. Additionally, compulsory set‐aside, which reduces agricultural surplus, could also have positive impacts on wildlife. In this paper we consider some of the putative benefits of agri‐environment schemes and set‐aside for mammals. 3 We review how establishment and management options within agri‐environment schemes and set‐aside might affect habitat resources for mammals. For example, conservation headlands increase plant and invertebrate resources within the crop edge for mammals such as wood mice. Grassy field margins can support communities of smaller mammals, and hedgerows may act as important commuting and hunting routes. Their potential will depend on factors such as seed mixtures used, timing and severity of cutting, and length of time they have been in place. 4 At a farm level, habitat heterogeneity may be increased through organic agriculture, which is supported by some agri‐environment schemes. Studies suggest significant benefits to mammals, including wood mice and bats. However, it is increasingly recognized that effective conservation of farmland mammals must seek solutions at the landscape scale, addressing such issues as habitat connectivity between farms. One approach may be the better targeting of scheme agreements. 5 We suggest that agri‐environment schemes and set‐aside can contribute to the conservation of mammals on farmland. Recent policy changes are likely to have further positive impacts on farmland wildlife but appropriate mammal monitoring programmes must be developed rigorously to assess their effects.
The impacts of agricultural intensification on farmland wildlife have been the subject of increasing concern, particularly over the last two decades. Population declines have occurred for a number of mammalian species, sometimes drastically so, and changes in farming practice are believed to be significant contributory factors. The major policy instruments for delivering environmental benefits on farmland are agri‐environment schemes. These encourage farmers to adopt more environmentally sensitive farming practices to promote farmland biodiversity. Additionally, compulsory set‐aside, which reduces agricultural surplus, could also have positive impacts on wildlife. In this paper we consider some of the putative benefits of agri‐environment schemes and set‐aside for mammals. We review how establishment and management options within agri‐environment schemes and set‐aside might affect habitat resources for mammals. For example, conservation headlands increase plant and invertebrate resources within the crop edge for mammals such as wood mice. Grassy field margins can support communities of smaller mammals, and hedgerows may act as important commuting and hunting routes. Their potential will depend on factors such as seed mixtures used, timing and severity of cutting, and length of time they have been in place. At a farm level, habitat heterogeneity may be increased through organic agriculture, which is supported by some agri‐environment schemes. Studies suggest significant benefits to mammals, including wood mice and bats. However, it is increasingly recognized that effective conservation of farmland mammals must seek solutions at the landscape scale, addressing such issues as habitat connectivity between farms. One approach may be the better targeting of scheme agreements. We suggest that agri‐environment schemes and set‐aside can contribute to the conservation of mammals on farmland. Recent policy changes are likely to have further positive impacts on farmland wildlife but appropriate mammal monitoring programmes must be developed rigorously to assess their effects.
The impacts of agricultural intensification on farmland wildlife have been the subject of increasing concern, particularly over the last two decades. Population declines have occurred for a number of mammalian species, sometimes drastically so, and changes in farming practice are believed to be significant contributory factors. The major policy instruments for delivering environmental benefits on farmland are agri-environment schemes. These encourage farmers to adopt more environmentally sensitive farming practices to promote farmland biodiversity. Additionally, compulsory set-aside, which reduces agricultural surplus, could also have positive impacts on wildlife. In this paper we consider some of the putative benefits of agri-environment schemes and set-aside for mammals. We review how establishment and management options within agri-environment schemes and set-aside might affect habitat resources for mammals. For example, conservation headlands increase plant and invertebrate resources within the crop edge for mammals such as wood mice. Grassy field margins can support communities of smaller mammals, and hedgerows may act as important commuting and hunting routes. Their potential will depend on factors such as seed mixtures used, timing and severity of cutting, and length of time they have been in place. At a farm level, habitat heterogeneity may be increased through organic agriculture, which is supported by some agri-environment schemes. Studies suggest significant benefits to mammals, including wood mice and bats. However, it is increasingly recognized that effective conservation of farmland mammals must seek solutions at the landscape scale, addressing such issues as habitat connectivity between farms. One approach may be the better targeting of scheme agreements. We suggest that agri-environment schemes and set-aside can contribute to the conservation of mammals on farmland. Recent policy changes are likely to have further positive impacts on farmland wildlife but appropriate mammal monitoring programmes must be developed rigorously to assess their effects.
Author MACDONALD, D. W.
SERVICE, K. M.
FEBER, R. E.
FIRBANK, L. G.
TATTERSALL, F. H.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: MACDONALD, D.W
– sequence: 2
  fullname: TATTERSALL, F.H
– sequence: 3
  fullname: SERVICE, K.M
– sequence: 4
  fullname: FIRBANK, L.G
– sequence: 5
  fullname: FEBER, R.E
BookMark eNqVkUuP0zAURi00SHQGfgMWEjucubbjPBYsSgVlpCkPwcDyykluqEuTFNud6fx7EgWBxApW3pzv2Do-Z2f90BNjzyUkEtLscpfINAUh8xwSBaASAJkr1DmmyekBW0idGaFKyM_YAjQYIQtdPGLnIexgxPNULdiHje06uw8vuP3mnaD-1vmh76iPPNRb6ihw2zc8UBQ2uIa44HdbG7n1xOOW-OEYbXS3xCvqqXUxPGYP29FHT36dF-zmzevPq7fi-v36arW8FrVOMxBV2SgqjbJQ64wstFmli6qWVpcWTKtN1VADaVMVCqhRORiprE6bcVa1Jmv1BXs2ew9--HGkEHE3HH0_XolKa21kWZgRWs1Q7YcQPLVYu-m9Qx-9dXuUgFNJ3OFUEqeSOJXEPyXxNFpe_mU5eNdZf__P--W8v3N7uv-_MW6WGwkwOsTscCHS6bfD-u-Y5To3-PXdGk1R6NXHL2t8NfJPZ761A05fG_DmkwKpAQqtpQH9E6mwqGI
CODEN MMLRAI
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2009_03_032
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10344_013_0751_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10841_010_9279_1
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2907_2008_00125_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_7998_2009_00626_x
crossref_primary_10_3763_ijas_2009_0394
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_5048
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10344_014_0852_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ppees_2011_08_001
crossref_primary_10_1080_11956860_2022_2151554
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1472_4642_2011_00795_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_ecog_01297
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani10091566
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolmodel_2010_08_015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2012_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_2028
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2010_11_025
crossref_primary_10_1556_168_2018_19_3_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2008_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_baae_2014_06_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actao_2009_03_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2010_09_004
crossref_primary_10_2981_wlb_12126
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10344_009_0338_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2010_12_032
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_172932
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2015_05_007
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00267_008_9176_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mambio_2017_11_003
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_12306
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1752_4598_2009_00069_x
crossref_primary_10_1002_jwmg_677
crossref_primary_10_1080_15627020_2017_1419072
crossref_primary_10_1080_00063657_2014_961894
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2024_109010
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2016_11_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2020_108518
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1600_0706_2009_18106_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10980_011_9692_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2016_04_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolind_2016_06_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2014_04_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2008_08_002
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_13016
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2907_2007_00114_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_d12120488
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_018_4242_z
crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_1799
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10336_009_0485_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2017_04_001
crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2012_07_004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_021_10345_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2009_05_012
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1994.tb00131.x
10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00082-7
10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09061425.x
10.2307/1381994
10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00773.x
10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00031-5
10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00072.x
10.2307/2404522
10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00169-X
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00868.x
10.1007/BF00317305
10.1016/0006-3207(93)90060-E
10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9
10.2307/2404698
10.1016/j.biocon.2003.06.004
10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.040078.x
10.1111/j.1365-2907.1976.tb00208.x
10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb02724.x
10.4098/AT.arch.99-7
10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00774.x
10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb03846.x
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00856.x
10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00146-4
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00152.x
10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.018
10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00098-1
10.2305/IUCN.CH.2001.SSC-AP.1.en
10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00084-1
10.1007/s10841-004-1332-5
10.1038/35099540
10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00057.x
10.2307/2404895
10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01218.x
10.1006/anbe.1998.0921
10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00124-4
10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00548.x
10.1098/rspb.2000.1325
10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00173-1
10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00119-X
10.2307/2404980
10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.034
10.2307/2404256
10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00550.x
10.1017/S095283690100156X
10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00342-5
10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.004
10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00117-8
10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00775.x
10.1046/j.1365-2907.2003.00004.x
10.1016/0016-7185(96)00014-0
10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00784.x
10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00626.x
10.1080/00063650309461304
10.1016/S0269-7491(98)00141-9
10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00695.x
10.1038/23127
10.1098/rsbl.2005.0357
10.1111/j.1744-7348.1994.tb04942.x
10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00976.x
10.1080/00063650409461341
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Oct 2007
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Oct 2007
DBID FBQ
BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
7QG
7QR
7SN
7TK
8FD
C1K
FR3
P64
DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1770.2002.00172_37_4.x
DatabaseName AGRIS
Istex
CrossRef
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Ecology Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Technology Research Database
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Ecology Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList

CrossRef
Technology Research Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: FBQ
  name: AGRIS
  url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Zoology
Agriculture
EISSN 1365-2907
EndPage 277
ExternalDocumentID 1408750251
10_1046_j_1440_1770_2002_00172_37_4_x
MAM100
ark_67375_WNG_5883CQVG_B
US201300833150
Genre reviewArticle
Feature
GroupedDBID .3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29M
31~
33P
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHBH
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABTAH
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AHBTC
AHEFC
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BIYOS
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EAD
EAP
EBD
EBS
EDH
EJD
EMK
EST
ESX
F00
F01
F04
FBQ
FEDTE
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TEORI
TWZ
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WIH
WIK
WNSPC
WOHZO
WQJ
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
YNT
YQT
ZCG
ZY4
ZZTAW
~02
~IA
~KM
~WT
AEUQT
AFPWT
BSCLL
WRC
AAYXX
AEYWJ
AGQPQ
AGYGG
CITATION
7QG
7QR
7SN
7TK
8FD
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
C1K
FR3
P64
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3460-b9d2e952a0c36ea0f6b38bc1a39a05f35bded04db820ed270512a34d9d2bf56f3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0305-1838
IngestDate Fri Jul 25 10:49:29 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:53 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:40:43 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:22:33 EST 2025
Wed Oct 30 09:50:35 EDT 2024
Thu Apr 03 09:43:49 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3460-b9d2e952a0c36ea0f6b38bc1a39a05f35bded04db820ed270512a34d9d2bf56f3
Notes http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2007.00100.x
ArticleID:MAM100
ark:/67375/WNG-5883CQVG-B
istex:5F76ED613C1C5C331E37ED4439E87503EC18C0D5
Present address: North Wyke Research Station, Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB.
Editor: RM
Present address: School of Health and Biosciences, University of East London, Stratford Campus, Romford Road, Stratford, London E15 1LZ, UK.
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
PQID 233351985
PQPubID 37933
PageCount 19
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_233351985
crossref_citationtrail_10_1046_j_1440_1770_2002_00172_37_4_x
crossref_primary_10_1046_j_1440_1770_2002_00172_37_4_x
wiley_primary_10_1046_j_1440_1770_2002_00172_37_4_x_MAM100
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_5883CQVG_B
fao_agris_US201300833150
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate October 2007
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2007-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2007
  text: October 2007
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Oxford, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford, UK
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Mammal review
PublicationYear 2007
Publisher Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References Walsh, A.L. & Harris, S. (1996) Foraging habitat preferences of Vespertilionid bats in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 508 - 518.
Tellaria, J.L., Santos, T. & Alcantara, M. (1991) Abundance and food-searching intensity of wood mice in fragmented forests. Journal of Mammology, 72, 183 - 187.
Mallorie, H.C. & Flowerdew, J.R. (1994) Woodland small mammal population ecology in Britain: a preliminary review of the Mammal Society survey of Wood Mice Apodemus sylvaticus and Bank Voles Clethrionomys glareolus, 1982-1987. Mammal Review, 24, 1 - 16.
Conrad, K.F., Woiwod, I.P., Parsons, M., Fox, R. & Warren, M.S. (2004) Long term population trends in widespread British moths. Journal of Insect Conservation, 8, 119 - 136.
Sotherton, N.W., Boatman, N.D. & Rands, M.R.W. (1989) The 'Conservation Headland' experiment in cereal ecosystems. Entomologist, 108, 135 - 143.
Plesner Jensen, S. (1993) Temporal changes in food preferences of wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus L. Oecologia, 94, 76 - 82.
Thomas, S.R., Noordhuis, R., Holland, J.M. & Goulson, D. (2002) Botanical diversity of beetle banks: effects of age and comparison with conventional arable field margins in southern UK. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 93, 403 - 412.
Hutchings, M.R. & Harris, S. (1996) The Current Status of the Brown Hare (Lepus europaeus) in Britain. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.
Chamberlain, D.E., Fuller, R.J., Bunce, R.G.H., Duckworth, J.C. & Shrubb, M. (2000) Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37, 771 - 788.
Defra (2004) Quality of Life Counts. Indicators for a Strategy for Sustainable Development for the United Kingdom: Updating the Baseline Assessments Made in 1999. Defra, London, UK.
Tattersall, F.H., Hart, B.J., Manley, W.J., Macdonald, D.W. & Feber, R.E. (1999b) Does the method of set-aside establishment affect its use by wood mice? Journal of Zoology (London), 249, 472 - 476.
Bright, P. & MacPherson, D. (2002) Hedgerow management, dormice and biodiversity. English Nature Research Report No. 454. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.
Jacob, J. (2003) Short term effects of farming practices on populations of common voles. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 95, 321 - 325.
Tew, T.E., Todd, I.A. & Macdonald, D.W. (2000) Arable habitat use by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). 2. Micro-habitat. Journal of Zoology (London), 250, 305 - 311.
Smith, R.K., Jennings, N.V. & Harris, S. (2005) A quantitative analysis of the abundance and demography of European hares Lepus europaeus in relation to habitat type, intensity of agriculture and climate. Mammal Review, 35, 1 - 24.
Fuller, R.J., Gregory, R.D., Gibbons, D.W., Marchant, J.H., Wilson, J.D., Baillie, S.R. & Carter, N. (1995) Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain. Conservation Biology, 9, 1425 - 1441.
Macdonald, D.W. & Johnson, P.J. (2000) Farmers and the custody of the countryside: trends in loss and conservation of non-productive habitat. Biological Conservation, 94, 221 - 234.
Strachan, R. & Holmes-Ling, P. (2003) Restoring Water Voles and Other Biodiversity to the Wider Countryside: A Report on the Chichester Coastal Plain Sustainable Farming Partnership. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Hutson, A.M., Mickleburgh, S.P. & Racey, P.A. (2001) Global Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan: Microchiropteran Bats. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
Parish, D. & Sotherton, N. (2004) Game crops and threatened farmland songbirds in 11 Scotland: a step towards halting population declines? Bird Study, 57, 107 - 112.
Birks, J.D.S. & Kitchener, A.C. (1999) The Distribution and Status of the Polecat Mustela Putorius in Britain in the 1990s. The Vincent Wildlife Trust, London, UK.
Montgomery, W.I. & Dowie, M. (1993) The distribution and population regulation of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus on field boundaries of pastoral farmland. Journal of Applied Ecology, 30, 783 - 791.
Shore, R.F., Meek, W.R., Sparks, T.H., Pywell, R.F. & Nowakowski, M. (2005) Will Environmental Stewardship enhance small mammal abundance on intensively managed farmland? Mammal Review, 35, 277 - 284.
Benton, T.G., Vickery, J.A. & Wilson, J.D. (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 182 - 188.
Smith, H., Feber, R.E., Johnson, P., McCallum, K., Plesner Jensen, S., Younes, M. & Macdonald, D.W. (1993) The Conservation Management of Arable Field Margins. English Nature Science no. 18. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.
Strachan, R. & Jeffries, D.J. (1993) The Water Vole (Arvicola Terrestris) in Britain 1989-1990: Its Distribution and Changing Status. The Vincent Wildlife Trust, London, UK.
Feber, R.E., Firbank, L.G., Johnson, P.J. & Macdonald, D.W. (1997) The effects of organic farming on pest and non-pest butterfly abundance. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 64, 133 - 139.
Ouin, A., Paillat, G., Butet, A. & Burel, F. (2000) Spatial dynamics of wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) in an agricultural landscape under intensive use in the Mont Saint Michel Bay (France). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 78, 159 - 165.
Donald, P.F., Green, R.E. & Heath, M.F. (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 268, 25 - 29.
Kleijn, D. & Sutherland, W.J. (2003) How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 947 - 969.
Macdonald, D.W., Tew, T.E.& Todd, I.A. (2004) The ecology of weasels (Mustela nivalis) on mixed farmland in southern England. Biologia, Bratislava, 59, 233 - 239.
McDonald, R.A., Harris, S., Turnbull, G., Brown, P. & Fletcher, M. (1998) Anticoagulant rodenticides in stoats (Mustela ermine) and weasels (M. nivalis) in England. Environmental Pollution, 103, 17 - 23.
Vaughan, N., Lucas, E., Harris, S. & White, P.C.L. (2003) Habitat associations of European hares Lepus europaeus in England and Wales: implications for farmland management. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 163 - 175.
Pywell, R.F., Warman, E.A., Hulmes, L., Hulmes, S., Nutall, P., Sparks, T.H., Critchley, C.N.R. & Sherwood, A. (2006) Effectivness of new agri-environment schemes in providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes. Biological Conservation, 129, 192 - 206.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1999) A Better Quality of Life: A Strategy for Sustainable Development for the United Kingdom. The Stationery Office, London, UK.
Defra (2002) The Strategy for Sustainable Farming and Food: Facing the Future. Defra, London, UK.
Moreby, S.J., Aebischer, N., Southway, S. & Sotherton, N. (1994) A comparison of the flora and arthropod fauna of organically and conventionally grown winter wheat in southern England. Annals of Applied Biology, 125, 13 - 27.
Barr, C.J., Bunce, R.G.H., Clarke, R.T., Fuller, R.M., Furse, M.T., Gillespie, M.K., Groom, G.B., Hallam, C.J., Horning, M., Howard, D.C. & Ness, M.J. (1993) Countryside Survey 1990: Main Report. Department of Environment, Eastcote, UK.
Wickramasinghe, L.P., Harris, S., Jones, G. & Jennings, N.V. (2003) Bat activity and species richness on organic and conventional farms: impact of agricultural intensification. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 984 - 993.
Krebs, J.R., Wilson, J.D., Bradbury, R.B. & Siriwardena, G.M. (1999) The second Silent Spring? Nature, 400, 611 - 612.
Feber, R.E., Bell, J.J., Firbank, L.G., Johnson, P.J. & Macdonald, D.W. (1998) The effects of organic farming on surface-active spider assemblages in wheat in southern England, U.K. Journal of Arachnology, 26, 190 - 202.
Vilhelmsen, H. (2003) Status of dormice (Muscardinus avellanarius) in Denmark. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungarica, 49 (Suppl. 1), 139 - 145.
MAFF (1998) Arable Area Payments 1998/1999, Explanatory Guide: Parts 1 & 2. MAFF, London, UK.
Fitzgibbon, C. (1997) Small mammals in farm woodlands: the effects of habitat, isolation and surrounding land use patterns. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 530 - 539.
Bright, P. (1998) Behaviour of specialist species in habitat corridors: arboreal dormice avoid corridor gaps. Animal Behaviour, 56, 1485 - 1490.
Tew, T.E., Macdonald, D.W. & Rands, M.R.W. (1992) Herbicide application affects microhabitat use by arable wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). Journal of Applied Ecology, 29, 532 - 539.
Tew, T.E. & Macdonald, D.W. (1993) The effects of harvest on arable wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus. Biological Conservation, 65, 279 - 283.
Sotherton, N.W. (1998) Land use changes and the decline of farmland wildlife: an appraisal of the set-aside approach. Biological Conservation, 83, 259 - 268.
Tattersall, F.H., Hart, B.J., Manley, W.J., Macdonald, D.W. & Feber, R.E. (1999a) Small mammals on set-aside blocks and margins. Aspects of Applied Biology, 54, 131 - 138.
Todd, I.A., Tew, T.E. & Macdonald, D.W. (2000) Arable habitat use by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). 1. Macrohabitat. Journal of Zoology (London), 250, 299 - 303.
Tattersall, F.H., Avundo, A.E., Manley, W.J., Hart, B.J. & Macdonald, D.W. (2000) Managing set-aside for field voles (Microtus agrestis). Biological Conservation, 96, 123 - 128.
Flowerdew, J.R. (1976) Ecological methods. Mammal Review, 6, 123 - 159.
Tattersall, F.H., Macdonald, D.W., Hart, B.J., Manley, W.J. & Feber, R.E. (2001) Habitat use by wood mice in a changeable arable landscape. Journal of Zoology (London), 255, 487 - 494.
Clarke, J. (1992) Set Aside. BCPC Monograph no. 50. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham.
Hyvonen, T., Ketoja, E., Salonen, J., Jalli, H. & Tiainen, J. (2003) Weed species diversity and community composition in organic and conventional cropping of spring cereals. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 97, 131 - 149.
Smith, R.K., Jennings, N.V., Robinson, A. & Harris, S. (2004) Conservation
1999a; 54
2004; 8
1993; 65
2000; 94
1999; 88
1999; 44
2000; 250
1994; 24
2003; 18
1999; 400
1998; 83
2003; 50
2003; 95
2003; 97
2001; 268
2003; 99
2000b; 250
1996; 33
2001; 255
1989; 108
2001
1990
2000
2005; 146
2000; 96
1993; 30
1999; 54
1999; 10
2003; 49
2000a
2002; 93
1996; 27
2003; 40
2006; 129
1998; 56
1992; 3
2005; 35
2001; 413
1998; 26
1995; 9
2002; 39
2004; 41
1999b; 249
1997; 64
1991; 72
1998
1996
1995; 236
1995
1993
2004
2003
1992
2002
1991
1976; 6
2003; 33
1999
1994; 125
2004; 18
2000; 37
2005; 122
1993; 94
2000; 78
1997; 242
2004; 59
1997; 34
2004; 57
1992; 29
2005; 1
1998; 103
2001; 38
2004; 119
1998; 9
Macdonald D.W. (e_1_2_10_55_1) 2000
e_1_2_10_44_1
Macdonald D.W. (e_1_2_10_53_1) 1991
Tattersall F.H. (e_1_2_10_83_1) 2003
Harris S. (e_1_2_10_39_1) 1995
Putman R. (e_1_2_10_69_1) 2003
e_1_2_10_70_1
e_1_2_10_93_1
e_1_2_10_18_1
e_1_2_10_97_1
e_1_2_10_6_1
e_1_2_10_14_1
e_1_2_10_78_1
e_1_2_10_13_1
e_1_2_10_32_1
Bright P. (e_1_2_10_11_1) 2002
Dendy J. (e_1_2_10_21_1) 2003
e_1_2_10_63_1
e_1_2_10_86_1
Hutchings M.R. (e_1_2_10_42_1) 1996
e_1_2_10_48_1
e_1_2_10_67_1
e_1_2_10_101_1
e_1_2_10_45_1
Defra (e_1_2_10_20_1) 2004
e_1_2_10_41_1
Sotherton N.W. (e_1_2_10_80_1) 1989; 108
Clarke J. (e_1_2_10_16_1) 1992
Andrews J. (e_1_2_10_2_1) 1992; 3
Macdonald D.W. (e_1_2_10_57_1) 2004; 59
e_1_2_10_90_1
Haines‐Young R.H. (e_1_2_10_38_1) 2000
e_1_2_10_71_1
e_1_2_10_52_1
e_1_2_10_75_1
e_1_2_10_56_1
Strachan R. (e_1_2_10_81_1) 2003
e_1_2_10_7_1
e_1_2_10_15_1
e_1_2_10_10_1
e_1_2_10_33_1
Barr C.J. (e_1_2_10_5_1) 1993
Trout R. (e_1_2_10_94_1) 2003
Brown R.W. (e_1_2_10_12_1) 1999; 54
Defra (e_1_2_10_19_1) 2002
e_1_2_10_64_1
e_1_2_10_49_1
e_1_2_10_87_1
e_1_2_10_68_1
e_1_2_10_46_1
Duverge P.L. (e_1_2_10_25_1) 2003
Wilson P.J. (e_1_2_10_102_1) 1992; 3
Asher J. (e_1_2_10_3_1) 2001
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (e_1_2_10_22_1) 1999
e_1_2_10_91_1
e_1_2_10_72_1
e_1_2_10_95_1
Strachan R. (e_1_2_10_82_1) 1993
e_1_2_10_4_1
Firbank L.G. (e_1_2_10_31_1) 1993
e_1_2_10_76_1
e_1_2_10_99_1
e_1_2_10_34_1
Feber R.E. (e_1_2_10_29_1) 1998; 26
e_1_2_10_30_1
Donald P.F. (e_1_2_10_23_1) 1998; 9
Gurnell J. (e_1_2_10_37_1) 1990
Smith H. (e_1_2_10_74_1) 1993
e_1_2_10_61_1
Luff M.L. (e_1_2_10_51_1) 1995
McDonald R.A. (e_1_2_10_58_1) 2003
e_1_2_10_27_1
e_1_2_10_65_1
e_1_2_10_88_1
Eden S. (e_1_2_10_26_1) 1999; 10
Tattersall F.H. (e_1_2_10_84_1) 1999; 54
e_1_2_10_24_1
e_1_2_10_43_1
Macdonald D.W. (e_1_2_10_54_1) 2001
Birks J.D.S. (e_1_2_10_8_1) 1999
Sotherton N.W. (e_1_2_10_77_1) 1991
e_1_2_10_92_1
e_1_2_10_73_1
e_1_2_10_96_1
e_1_2_10_17_1
e_1_2_10_36_1
e_1_2_10_35_1
e_1_2_10_9_1
e_1_2_10_59_1
Vilhelmsen H. (e_1_2_10_98_1) 2003; 49
e_1_2_10_50_1
Sotherton N.W. (e_1_2_10_79_1) 2000
Henderson I.G. (e_1_2_10_40_1) 2000
e_1_2_10_62_1
e_1_2_10_85_1
e_1_2_10_28_1
MAFF (e_1_2_10_60_1) 1998
e_1_2_10_66_1
e_1_2_10_100_1
e_1_2_10_47_1
e_1_2_10_89_1
References_xml – reference: Firbank, L.G., Smart, S.M., Crabb, J., Critchley, C.N.R., Fowbert, J.W., Fuller, R.J., Gladders, P., Green, D.B., Henderson, I. & Hill, M.O. (2003) Agronomic and ecological costs and benefits of set-aside in England. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 95, 73 - 85.
– reference: Wilson, P.J. (1992) Britain's arable weeds. British Wildlife, 3, 149 - 161.
– reference: Andrews, J. (1992) Some practical problems in set-aside management for wildlife. British Wildlife, 3, 329 - 336.
– reference: Firbank, L.G., Arnold, H.R., Eversham, B.C., Mountford, J.O., Radford, G.L., Telfer, M.G., Treweek, J.R., Webb, N.R.C. & Wells, T.C.E. (1993) Managing Set-aside Land for Wildlife. ITE Research publication 7. HMSO, London, UK.
– reference: Gurnell, J. & Flowerdew, J.R. (1990) Live Trapping Small Mammals: A Practical Guide. The Mammal Society, London, UK.
– reference: Bradbury, R.B. & Allen, D.S. (2003) Evaluation of the impact of the pilot UK arable stewardship scheme on breeding and wintering birds. Bird Study, 50, 131 - 141.
– reference: Haines-Young, R.H., Barr, C.J., Black, H.I.J., Briggs, D.J., Bunce, R.G.H., Clarke, R.T., Cooper, A., Dawson, F.H., Firbank, L.G., Fuller, R.M., Furse, M.T., Gillespie, M.K., Hill, R., Hornung, M., Howard, D.C., McCann, T., Morecroft, M.D., Petit, S., Sier, A.R.J., Smart, S.M., Smith, G.M., Stott, A.P., Stuart, R.C. & Watkins, J.W. (2000) Accounting for Nature: Assessing Habitats in the Countryside. DETR, London, UK.
– reference: Tattersall, F.H., Hart, B.J., Manley, W.J., Macdonald, D.W. & Feber, R.E. (1999a) Small mammals on set-aside blocks and margins. Aspects of Applied Biology, 54, 131 - 138.
– reference: Feber, R.E., Smith, H. & Macdonald, D.W. (1996) The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 1191 - 1205.
– reference: Firbank, L.G. (2005) Striking a new balance between agricultural production and biodiversity. Annals of Applied Biology, 146, 163 - 175.
– reference: Vickery, J.A., Bradbury, R.B., Henderson, I.G., Eaton, M.A. & Grice, P.V. (2004) The role of agri-environment schemes and farm management practices in reversing the decline of farmland birds in England. Biological Conservation, 119, 19 - 39.
– reference: Kleijn, D., Berendse, F., Smit, R., Gilissen, N., Smit, J., Brak, B. & Groenevld, R. (2004) Ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes in different agricultural landscapes in the Netherlands. Conservation Biology, 18, 775 - 786.
– reference: Sotherton, N.W., Boatman, N.D. & Rands, M.R.W. (1989) The 'Conservation Headland' experiment in cereal ecosystems. Entomologist, 108, 135 - 143.
– reference: Donald, P.F. (1998) Changes in the abundance of invertebrates and plants on British farmland. British Wildlife, 9, 279 - 289.
– reference: Rogers, L.M. & Gorman, M.L. (1995) The population dynamics of small mammals living in set-aside and surrounding semi-natural and crop land. Journal of Zoology (London), 236, 451 - 464.
– reference: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (1999) A Better Quality of Life: A Strategy for Sustainable Development for the United Kingdom. The Stationery Office, London, UK.
– reference: Fuller, R.J., Norton, L.R., Feber, R.E., Johnson, P.J., Chamberlain, D.E., Joys, A.C., Mathews, F., Stuart, R.C., Townsend, M.C., Manley, W.J., Wolfe, M.S., Macdonald, D.W. & Firbank, L.G. (2005) The scale of benefits to biodiversity from organic farming. Biology Letters, 1, 431 - 434.
– reference: Barr, C.J., Bunce, R.G.H., Clarke, R.T., Fuller, R.M., Furse, M.T., Gillespie, M.K., Groom, G.B., Hallam, C.J., Horning, M., Howard, D.C. & Ness, M.J. (1993) Countryside Survey 1990: Main Report. Department of Environment, Eastcote, UK.
– reference: Hole, D.G., Perkins, A.J., Wilson, J.D., Alexander, I.H., Grice, P.V. & Evans, A.D. (2005) Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? Biological Conservation, 122, 113 - 130.
– reference: Ouin, A., Paillat, G., Butet, A. & Burel, F. (2000) Spatial dynamics of wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) in an agricultural landscape under intensive use in the Mont Saint Michel Bay (France). Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 78, 159 - 165.
– reference: Battershill, M.R.J. & Gilg, A.W. (1996) Traditional farming and agro-environment policy in southwest England: back to the future? Geoforum, 27, 133 - 147.
– reference: Tew, T.E., Todd, I.A. & Macdonald, D.W. (2000) Arable habitat use by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). 2. Micro-habitat. Journal of Zoology (London), 250, 305 - 311.
– reference: Wickramasinghe, L.P., Harris, S., Jones, G. & Jennings, N.V. (2003) Bat activity and species richness on organic and conventional farms: impact of agricultural intensification. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 984 - 993.
– reference: Donald, P.F., Green, R.E. & Heath, M.F. (2001) Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 268, 25 - 29.
– reference: Macdonald, D.W. & Tattersall, F.H. (2001) Britain's Mammals: The Challenge for Conservation. People's Trust for Endangered Species, London.
– reference: Mallorie, H.C. & Flowerdew, J.R. (1994) Woodland small mammal population ecology in Britain: a preliminary review of the Mammal Society survey of Wood Mice Apodemus sylvaticus and Bank Voles Clethrionomys glareolus, 1982-1987. Mammal Review, 24, 1 - 16.
– reference: Birks, J.D.S. & Kitchener, A.C. (1999) The Distribution and Status of the Polecat Mustela Putorius in Britain in the 1990s. The Vincent Wildlife Trust, London, UK.
– reference: Asher, J., Warren, M., Fox, R., Harding, P., Jeffcoate, G. & Jeffcoate, S. (2001) The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
– reference: Hutchings, M.R. & Harris, S. (1996) The Current Status of the Brown Hare (Lepus europaeus) in Britain. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.
– reference: Kleijn, D., Berendse, F., Smit, R. & Gilissen, N. (2001) Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature, 413, 723 - 725.
– reference: Clarke, J. (1992) Set Aside. BCPC Monograph no. 50. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham.
– reference: Benton, T.G., Vickery, J.A. & Wilson, J.D. (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 182 - 188.
– reference: Eden, S. & Eden, R. (1999) Dormice in Dorset - the importance of hedges and scrub. British Wildlife, 10, 185 - 189.
– reference: Moreby, S.J., Aebischer, N., Southway, S. & Sotherton, N. (1994) A comparison of the flora and arthropod fauna of organically and conventionally grown winter wheat in southern England. Annals of Applied Biology, 125, 13 - 27.
– reference: Tellaria, J.L., Santos, T. & Alcantara, M. (1991) Abundance and food-searching intensity of wood mice in fragmented forests. Journal of Mammology, 72, 183 - 187.
– reference: Aude, E., Tybirk, K. & Bruus Pedersen, M. (2003) Vegetation diversity of conventional and organic hedgerows in Denmark. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 99, 135 - 147.
– reference: Smith, R.K., Jennings, N.V. & Harris, S. (2005) A quantitative analysis of the abundance and demography of European hares Lepus europaeus in relation to habitat type, intensity of agriculture and climate. Mammal Review, 35, 1 - 24.
– reference: Tew, T.E. & Macdonald, D.W. (1993) The effects of harvest on arable wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus. Biological Conservation, 65, 279 - 283.
– reference: Harris, S., Morris, P., Wray, S. & Yalden, D. (1995) A Review of British Mammals: Population Estimates and Conservation Status of British Mammals other than Cetaceans. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.
– reference: Conrad, K.F., Woiwod, I.P., Parsons, M., Fox, R. & Warren, M.S. (2004) Long term population trends in widespread British moths. Journal of Insect Conservation, 8, 119 - 136.
– reference: Defra (2004) Quality of Life Counts. Indicators for a Strategy for Sustainable Development for the United Kingdom: Updating the Baseline Assessments Made in 1999. Defra, London, UK.
– reference: Macdonald, D.W., Tew, T.E.& Todd, I.A. (2004) The ecology of weasels (Mustela nivalis) on mixed farmland in southern England. Biologia, Bratislava, 59, 233 - 239.
– reference: Moore, N.P., Askew, N. & Bishop, J.D. (2003) Small mammals in new farm woodlands. Mammal Review, 33, 101 - 104.
– reference: Sotherton, N.W. (1998) Land use changes and the decline of farmland wildlife: an appraisal of the set-aside approach. Biological Conservation, 83, 259 - 268.
– reference: Feber, R.E., Bell, J.J., Firbank, L.G., Johnson, P.J. & Macdonald, D.W. (1998) The effects of organic farming on surface-active spider assemblages in wheat in southern England, U.K. Journal of Arachnology, 26, 190 - 202.
– reference: Jacob, J. (2003) Short term effects of farming practices on populations of common voles. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 95, 321 - 325.
– reference: Vilhelmsen, H. (2003) Status of dormice (Muscardinus avellanarius) in Denmark. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungarica, 49 (Suppl. 1), 139 - 145.
– reference: Todd, I.A., Tew, T.E. & Macdonald, D.W. (2000) Arable habitat use by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). 1. Macrohabitat. Journal of Zoology (London), 250, 299 - 303.
– reference: Tattersall, F.H., Macdonald, D.W., Hart, B.J., Manley, W.J. & Feber, R.E. (2001) Habitat use by wood mice in a changeable arable landscape. Journal of Zoology (London), 255, 487 - 494.
– reference: Chamberlain, D.E., Wilson, J.D. & Fuller, R.J. (1999) A comparison of bird populations on organic and conventional farm systems in southern Britain. Biological Conservation, 88, 307 - 320.
– reference: Montgomery, W.I. & Dowie, M. (1993) The distribution and population regulation of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus on field boundaries of pastoral farmland. Journal of Applied Ecology, 30, 783 - 791.
– reference: Shore, R.F., Meek, W.R., Sparks, T.H., Pywell, R.F. & Nowakowski, M. (2005) Will Environmental Stewardship enhance small mammal abundance on intensively managed farmland? Mammal Review, 35, 277 - 284.
– reference: Defra (2002) The Strategy for Sustainable Farming and Food: Facing the Future. Defra, London, UK.
– reference: Hutson, A.M., Mickleburgh, S.P. & Racey, P.A. (2001) Global Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan: Microchiropteran Bats. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
– reference: Strachan, R. & Holmes-Ling, P. (2003) Restoring Water Voles and Other Biodiversity to the Wider Countryside: A Report on the Chichester Coastal Plain Sustainable Farming Partnership. Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
– reference: Tew, T.E., Macdonald, D.W. & Rands, M.R.W. (1992) Herbicide application affects microhabitat use by arable wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). Journal of Applied Ecology, 29, 532 - 539.
– reference: Brown, R.W. (1999) Margin/field interfaces and small mammals. Aspects of Applied Biology, 54, 203 - 210.
– reference: Tattersall, F.H., Hart, B.J., Manley, W.J., Macdonald, D.W. & Feber, R.E. (1999b) Does the method of set-aside establishment affect its use by wood mice? Journal of Zoology (London), 249, 472 - 476.
– reference: Wickramasinghe, L.P., Harris, S., Jones, G. & Jennings, N.V. (2004) Abundance and species richness of nocturnal insects on organic and conventional farms: effects of agricultural intensification on bat foraging. Conservation Biology, 18, 1283 - 1292.
– reference: Bright, P. & MacPherson, D. (2002) Hedgerow management, dormice and biodiversity. English Nature Research Report No. 454. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.
– reference: Kleijn, D. & Sutherland, W.J. (2003) How effective are European agri-environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 947 - 969.
– reference: Fitzgibbon, C. (1997) Small mammals in farm woodlands: the effects of habitat, isolation and surrounding land use patterns. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 530 - 539.
– reference: Panek, M. & Kamieniarz, R. (1999) Relationships between density of brown hare (Lepus europaeus) and landscape structure in Poland in the years 1981-1995. Acta Theriologica,., 44, 67 - 75.
– reference: Pywell, R.F., Warman, E.A., Hulmes, L., Hulmes, S., Nutall, P., Sparks, T.H., Critchley, C.N.R. & Sherwood, A. (2006) Effectivness of new agri-environment schemes in providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes. Biological Conservation, 129, 192 - 206.
– reference: Parish, D. & Sotherton, N. (2004) Game crops and threatened farmland songbirds in 11 Scotland: a step towards halting population declines? Bird Study, 57, 107 - 112.
– reference: MAFF (1998) Arable Area Payments 1998/1999, Explanatory Guide: Parts 1 & 2. MAFF, London, UK.
– reference: Hyvonen, T., Ketoja, E., Salonen, J., Jalli, H. & Tiainen, J. (2003) Weed species diversity and community composition in organic and conventional cropping of spring cereals. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 97, 131 - 149.
– reference: McDonald, R.A., Harris, S., Turnbull, G., Brown, P. & Fletcher, M. (1998) Anticoagulant rodenticides in stoats (Mustela ermine) and weasels (M. nivalis) in England. Environmental Pollution, 103, 17 - 23.
– reference: Thomas, S.R., Noordhuis, R., Holland, J.M. & Goulson, D. (2002) Botanical diversity of beetle banks: effects of age and comparison with conventional arable field margins in southern UK. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 93, 403 - 412.
– reference: Flowerdew, J.R. (1976) Ecological methods. Mammal Review, 6, 123 - 159.
– reference: Smith, H., Feber, R.E., Johnson, P., McCallum, K., Plesner Jensen, S., Younes, M. & Macdonald, D.W. (1993) The Conservation Management of Arable Field Margins. English Nature Science no. 18. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.
– reference: Smith, R.K., Jennings, N.V., Robinson, A. & Harris, S. (2004) Conservation of European hares Lepus europaeus in Britain: is increasing habitat heterogeneity in farmland the answer? Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 1092 - 1102.
– reference: Krebs, J.R., Wilson, J.D., Bradbury, R.B. & Siriwardena, G.M. (1999) The second Silent Spring? Nature, 400, 611 - 612.
– reference: Strachan, R. & Jeffries, D.J. (1993) The Water Vole (Arvicola Terrestris) in Britain 1989-1990: Its Distribution and Changing Status. The Vincent Wildlife Trust, London, UK.
– reference: Kotzageorgis, G.C. & Mason, C.F. (1997) Small mammal populations in relation to hedgerow structure in an arable landscape. Journal of Zoology, 242, 425 - 434.
– reference: Tattersall, F.H., Avundo, A.E., Manley, W.J., Hart, B.J. & Macdonald, D.W. (2000) Managing set-aside for field voles (Microtus agrestis). Biological Conservation, 96, 123 - 128.
– reference: Fuller, R.J., Gregory, R.D., Gibbons, D.W., Marchant, J.H., Wilson, J.D., Baillie, S.R. & Carter, N. (1995) Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain. Conservation Biology, 9, 1425 - 1441.
– reference: Robinson, R.A. & Sutherland, R.J. (2002) Post war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 157 - 176.
– reference: Macdonald, D.W., Tew, T.E., Todd, I.A., Garner, J.P. & Johnson, P.J. (2000b) Arable habitat use by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) 3. A farm-scale experiment on the effects of crop rotation. Journal of Zoology, 250, 313 - 320.
– reference: Critchley, C.N.R., Allen, D.S., Fowbert, J.A., Mole, A.C. & Gundrey, A.L. (2004) Habitat establishment on arable land: assessment of an agri-environment scheme in England, UK. Biological Conservation, 119, 429 - 442.
– reference: Walsh, A.L. & Harris, S. (1996) Foraging habitat preferences of Vespertilionid bats in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology, 33, 508 - 518.
– reference: Macdonald, D.W. & Johnson, P.J. (2000) Farmers and the custody of the countryside: trends in loss and conservation of non-productive habitat. Biological Conservation, 94, 221 - 234.
– reference: Bright, P. (1998) Behaviour of specialist species in habitat corridors: arboreal dormice avoid corridor gaps. Animal Behaviour, 56, 1485 - 1490.
– reference: Feber, R.E., Firbank, L.G., Johnson, P.J. & Macdonald, D.W. (1997) The effects of organic farming on pest and non-pest butterfly abundance. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 64, 133 - 139.
– reference: Plesner Jensen, S. (1993) Temporal changes in food preferences of wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus L. Oecologia, 94, 76 - 82.
– reference: Vaughan, N., Lucas, E., Harris, S. & White, P.C.L. (2003) Habitat associations of European hares Lepus europaeus in England and Wales: implications for farmland management. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 163 - 175.
– reference: Vickery, J.A., Tallowin, J.T., Feber, R.E., Asteraki, E.A., Atkinson, P.W., Fuller, R.J. & Brown, V.K. (2001) Effects of grassland management on birds and their food resources, with special reference to recent changes in fertiliser, mowing and grazing practices on lowland neutral grasslands in Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, 647 - 664.
– reference: Chamberlain, D.E., Fuller, R.J., Bunce, R.G.H., Duckworth, J.C. & Shrubb, M. (2000) Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. Journal of Applied Ecology, 37, 771 - 788.
– volume: 37
  start-page: 771
  year: 2000
  end-page: 788
  article-title: Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 129
  start-page: 192
  year: 2006
  end-page: 206
  article-title: Effectivness of new agri‐environment schemes in providing foraging resources for bumblebees in intensively farmed landscapes
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 97
  start-page: 131
  year: 2003
  end-page: 149
  article-title: Weed species diversity and community composition in organic and conventional cropping of spring cereals
  publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
– volume: 236
  start-page: 451
  year: 1995
  end-page: 464
  article-title: The population dynamics of small mammals living in set‐aside and surrounding semi‐natural and crop land
  publication-title: Journal of Zoology (London)
– volume: 64
  start-page: 133
  year: 1997
  end-page: 139
  article-title: The effects of organic farming on pest and non‐pest butterfly abundance
  publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
– start-page: 21
  year: 2003
  end-page: 219
– volume: 10
  start-page: 185
  year: 1999
  end-page: 189
  article-title: Dormice in Dorset – the importance of hedges and scrub
  publication-title: British Wildlife
– volume: 96
  start-page: 123
  year: 2000
  end-page: 128
  article-title: Managing set‐aside for field voles ( )
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 95
  start-page: 73
  year: 2003
  end-page: 85
  article-title: Agronomic and ecological costs and benefits of set‐aside in England
  publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
– volume: 57
  start-page: 107
  year: 2004
  end-page: 112
  article-title: Game crops and threatened farmland songbirds in 11 Scotland: a step towards halting population declines?
  publication-title: Bird Study
– year: 2001
– volume: 268
  start-page: 25
  year: 2001
  end-page: 29
  article-title: Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations
  publication-title: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B
– volume: 33
  start-page: 1191
  year: 1996
  end-page: 1205
  article-title: The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fields
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 33
  start-page: 101
  year: 2003
  end-page: 104
  article-title: Small mammals in new farm woodlands
  publication-title: Mammal Review
– start-page: 339
  year: 2000
  end-page: 422
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1
  year: 2005
  end-page: 24
  article-title: A quantitative analysis of the abundance and demography of European hares in relation to habitat type, intensity of agriculture and climate
  publication-title: Mammal Review
– volume: 41
  start-page: 1092
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1102
  article-title: Conservation of European hares in Britain: is increasing habitat heterogeneity in farmland the answer?
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– start-page: 357
  year: 2000a
  end-page: 385
– start-page: 106
  year: 2003
  end-page: 119
– year: 1990
– volume: 125
  start-page: 13
  year: 1994
  end-page: 27
  article-title: A comparison of the flora and arthropod fauna of organically and conventionally grown winter wheat in southern England
  publication-title: Annals of Applied Biology
– volume: 413
  start-page: 723
  year: 2001
  end-page: 725
  article-title: Agri‐environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes
  publication-title: Nature
– year: 1998
– volume: 49
  start-page: 139
  issue: Suppl. 1
  year: 2003
  end-page: 145
  article-title: Status of dormice ( ) in Denmark
  publication-title: Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungarica
– volume: 44
  start-page: 67
  year: 1999
  end-page: 75
  article-title: Relationships between density of brown hare ( ) and landscape structure in Poland in the years 1981–1995
  publication-title: Acta Theriologica,.
– start-page: 373
  year: 1991
  end-page: 397
– volume: 65
  start-page: 279
  year: 1993
  end-page: 283
  article-title: The effects of harvest on arable wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 18
  start-page: 775
  year: 2004
  end-page: 786
  article-title: Ecological effectiveness of agri‐environment schemes in different agricultural landscapes in the Netherlands
  publication-title: Conservation Biology
– volume: 400
  start-page: 611
  year: 1999
  end-page: 612
  article-title: The second Silent Spring?
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 54
  start-page: 131
  year: 1999a
  end-page: 138
  article-title: Small mammals on set‐aside blocks and margins
  publication-title: Aspects of Applied Biology
– volume: 50
  start-page: 131
  year: 2003
  end-page: 141
  article-title: Evaluation of the impact of the pilot UK arable stewardship scheme on breeding and wintering birds
  publication-title: Bird Study
– volume: 3
  start-page: 149
  year: 1992
  end-page: 161
  article-title: Britain's arable weeds
  publication-title: British Wildlife
– volume: 6
  start-page: 123
  year: 1976
  end-page: 159
  article-title: Ecological methods
  publication-title: Mammal Review
– volume: 250
  start-page: 299
  year: 2000
  end-page: 303
  article-title: Arable habitat use by wood mice ( ). 1. Macrohabitat
  publication-title: Journal of Zoology (London)
– volume: 95
  start-page: 321
  year: 2003
  end-page: 325
  article-title: Short term effects of farming practices on populations of common voles
  publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
– year: 2004
– volume: 103
  start-page: 17
  year: 1998
  end-page: 23
  article-title: Anticoagulant rodenticides in stoats ( ) and weasels ( ) in England
  publication-title: Environmental Pollution
– volume: 78
  start-page: 159
  year: 2000
  end-page: 165
  article-title: Spatial dynamics of wood mouse ( ) in an agricultural landscape under intensive use in the Mont Saint Michel Bay (France)
  publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
– volume: 88
  start-page: 307
  year: 1999
  end-page: 320
  article-title: A comparison of bird populations on organic and conventional farm systems in southern Britain
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 146
  start-page: 163
  year: 2005
  end-page: 175
  article-title: Striking a new balance between agricultural production and biodiversity
  publication-title: Annals of Applied Biology
– start-page: 399
  year: 1995
  end-page: 422
– volume: 3
  start-page: 329
  year: 1992
  end-page: 336
  article-title: Some practical problems in set‐aside management for wildlife
  publication-title: British Wildlife
– start-page: 198
  year: 2003
  end-page: 210
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1
  year: 1994
  end-page: 16
  article-title: Woodland small mammal population ecology in Britain: a preliminary review of the Mammal Society survey of Wood Mice and Bank Voles , 1982–1987
  publication-title: Mammal Review
– start-page: 82
  year: 2003
  end-page: 96
– volume: 119
  start-page: 19
  year: 2004
  end-page: 39
  article-title: The role of agri‐environment schemes and farm management practices in reversing the decline of farmland birds in England
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– year: 1993
– volume: 40
  start-page: 163
  year: 2003
  end-page: 175
  article-title: Habitat associations of European hares in England and Wales: implications for farmland management
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 8
  start-page: 119
  year: 2004
  end-page: 136
  article-title: Long term population trends in widespread British moths
  publication-title: Journal of Insect Conservation
– volume: 34
  start-page: 530
  year: 1997
  end-page: 539
  article-title: Small mammals in farm woodlands: the effects of habitat, isolation and surrounding land use patterns
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 83
  start-page: 259
  year: 1998
  end-page: 268
  article-title: Land use changes and the decline of farmland wildlife: an appraisal of the set‐aside approach
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 250
  start-page: 313
  year: 2000b
  end-page: 320
  article-title: Arable habitat use by wood mice ( ) 3. A farm‐scale experiment on the effects of crop rotation
  publication-title: Journal of Zoology
– volume: 38
  start-page: 647
  year: 2001
  end-page: 664
  article-title: Effects of grassland management on birds and their food resources, with special reference to recent changes in fertiliser, mowing and grazing practices on lowland neutral grasslands in Britain
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1283
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1292
  article-title: Abundance and species richness of nocturnal insects on organic and conventional farms: effects of agricultural intensification on bat foraging
  publication-title: Conservation Biology
– volume: 122
  start-page: 113
  year: 2005
  end-page: 130
  article-title: Does organic farming benefit biodiversity?
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 108
  start-page: 135
  year: 1989
  end-page: 143
  article-title: The ‘Conservation Headland’ experiment in cereal ecosystems
  publication-title: Entomologist
– volume: 93
  start-page: 403
  year: 2002
  end-page: 412
  article-title: Botanical diversity of beetle banks: effects of age and comparison with conventional arable field margins in southern UK
  publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
– volume: 39
  start-page: 157
  year: 2002
  end-page: 176
  article-title: Post war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– year: 2003
– year: 2000
– year: 1996
– volume: 94
  start-page: 221
  year: 2000
  end-page: 234
  article-title: Farmers and the custody of the countryside: trends in loss and conservation of non‐productive habitat
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 40
  start-page: 984
  year: 2003
  end-page: 993
  article-title: Bat activity and species richness on organic and conventional farms: impact of agricultural intensification
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 56
  start-page: 1485
  year: 1998
  end-page: 1490
  article-title: Behaviour of specialist species in habitat corridors: arboreal dormice avoid corridor gaps
  publication-title: Animal Behaviour
– volume: 250
  start-page: 305
  year: 2000
  end-page: 311
  article-title: Arable habitat use by wood mice ( ). 2. Micro‐habitat
  publication-title: Journal of Zoology (London)
– volume: 59
  start-page: 233
  year: 2004
  end-page: 239
  article-title: The ecology of weasels ( ) on mixed farmland in southern England
  publication-title: Biologia, Bratislava
– year: 1992
– volume: 26
  start-page: 190
  year: 1998
  end-page: 202
  article-title: The effects of organic farming on surface‐active spider assemblages in wheat in southern England, U.K
  publication-title: Journal of Arachnology
– start-page: 413
  year: 1991
  end-page: 448
– volume: 29
  start-page: 532
  year: 1992
  end-page: 539
  article-title: Herbicide application affects microhabitat use by arable wood mice ( )
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– start-page: 86
  year: 2003
  end-page: 197
– start-page: 64
  year: 2003
  end-page: 81
– volume: 30
  start-page: 783
  year: 1993
  end-page: 791
  article-title: The distribution and population regulation of the wood mouse on field boundaries of pastoral farmland
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 40
  start-page: 947
  year: 2003
  end-page: 969
  article-title: How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 99
  start-page: 135
  year: 2003
  end-page: 147
  article-title: Vegetation diversity of conventional and organic hedgerows in Denmark
  publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
– volume: 249
  start-page: 472
  year: 1999b
  end-page: 476
  article-title: Does the method of set‐aside establishment affect its use by wood mice?
  publication-title: Journal of Zoology (London)
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1425
  year: 1995
  end-page: 1441
  article-title: Population declines and range contractions among lowland farmland birds in Britain
  publication-title: Conservation Biology
– volume: 54
  start-page: 203
  year: 1999
  end-page: 210
  article-title: Margin/field interfaces and small mammals
  publication-title: Aspects of Applied Biology
– start-page: 26
  year: 2000
  end-page: 35
– volume: 242
  start-page: 425
  year: 1997
  end-page: 434
  article-title: Small mammal populations in relation to hedgerow structure in an arable landscape
  publication-title: Journal of Zoology
– volume: 119
  start-page: 429
  year: 2004
  end-page: 442
  article-title: Habitat establishment on arable land: assessment of an agri‐environment scheme in England, UK
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 35
  start-page: 277
  year: 2005
  end-page: 284
  article-title: Will Environmental Stewardship enhance small mammal abundance on intensively managed farmland?
  publication-title: Mammal Review
– year: 2002
– volume: 9
  start-page: 279
  year: 1998
  end-page: 289
  article-title: Changes in the abundance of invertebrates and plants on British farmland
  publication-title: British Wildlife
– year: 1995
– volume: 72
  start-page: 183
  year: 1991
  end-page: 187
  article-title: Abundance and food‐searching intensity of wood mice in fragmented forests
  publication-title: Journal of Mammology
– volume: 1
  start-page: 431
  year: 2005
  end-page: 434
  article-title: The scale of benefits to biodiversity from organic farming
  publication-title: Biology Letters
– volume: 33
  start-page: 508
  year: 1996
  end-page: 518
  article-title: Foraging habitat preferences of Vespertilionid bats in Britain
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 94
  start-page: 76
  year: 1993
  end-page: 82
  article-title: Temporal changes in food preferences of wood mice, L
  publication-title: Oecologia
– volume: 18
  start-page: 182
  year: 2003
  end-page: 188
  article-title: Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key?
  publication-title: Trends in Ecology and Evolution
– volume: 255
  start-page: 487
  year: 2001
  end-page: 494
  article-title: Habitat use by wood mice in a changeable arable landscape
  publication-title: Journal of Zoology (London)
– volume: 27
  start-page: 133
  year: 1996
  end-page: 147
  article-title: Traditional farming and agro‐environment policy in southwest England: back to the future?
  publication-title: Geoforum
– year: 1999
– ident: e_1_2_10_61_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1994.tb00131.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_78_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00082-7
– ident: e_1_2_10_35_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09061425.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_13_1
– volume-title: The Current Status of the Brown Hare (Lepus europaeus) in Britain.
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_10_42_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_88_1
  doi: 10.2307/1381994
– ident: e_1_2_10_93_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00773.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_28_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00031-5
– ident: e_1_2_10_73_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00072.x
– volume-title: Restoring Water Voles and Other Biodiversity to the Wider Countryside: A Report on the Chichester Coastal Plain Sustainable Farming Partnership.
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_10_81_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_90_1
  doi: 10.2307/2404522
– ident: e_1_2_10_32_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00169-X
– start-page: 82
  volume-title: Conservation and Conflict: Mammals and Farming in Britain
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_10_83_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_46_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00868.x
– volume-title: The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_10_3_1
– volume-title: The Distribution and Status of the Polecat Mustela Putorius in Britain in the 1990s
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_10_8_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_68_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00317305
– start-page: 413
  volume-title: The Ecology of Temperate Cereal Fields
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_10_53_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_89_1
  doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(93)90060-E
– start-page: 198
  volume-title: Conservation and Conflict: Mammals and Farming in Britain
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_10_94_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00011-9
– start-page: 21
  volume-title: Conservation and Conflict: Mammals and Farming in Britain
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_10_21_1
– volume-title: Accounting for Nature: Assessing Habitats in the Countryside.
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_10_38_1
– volume: 54
  start-page: 131
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_10_84_1
  article-title: Small mammals on set‐aside blocks and margins
  publication-title: Aspects of Applied Biology
– ident: e_1_2_10_27_1
  doi: 10.2307/2404698
– volume-title: A Better Quality of Life: A Strategy for Sustainable Development for the United Kingdom
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_10_22_1
– volume-title: Set Aside
  year: 1992
  ident: e_1_2_10_16_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_97_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.06.004
– volume-title: Quality of Life Counts. Indicators for a Strategy for Sustainable Development for the United Kingdom: Updating the Baseline Assessments Made in 1999
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_10_20_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_30_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.040078.x
– start-page: 339
  volume-title: Ecology and Conservation of Lowland Farmland Birds
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_10_40_1
– start-page: 86
  volume-title: Conservation and Conflict: Mammals and Farming in Britain
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_10_69_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_34_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1976.tb00208.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_72_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb02724.x
– volume: 10
  start-page: 185
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_10_26_1
  article-title: Dormice in Dorset – the importance of hedges and scrub
  publication-title: British Wildlife
– ident: e_1_2_10_66_1
  doi: 10.4098/AT.arch.99-7
– ident: e_1_2_10_91_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00774.x
– volume: 3
  start-page: 329
  year: 1992
  ident: e_1_2_10_2_1
  article-title: Some practical problems in set‐aside management for wildlife
  publication-title: British Wildlife
– ident: e_1_2_10_49_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb03846.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_100_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2003.00856.x
– start-page: 399
  volume-title: Insects in a Changing Environment
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_10_51_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00146-4
– ident: e_1_2_10_101_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00152.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_41_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.018
– volume-title: The Strategy for Sustainable Farming and Food: Facing the Future
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_10_19_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_86_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00098-1
– ident: e_1_2_10_43_1
  doi: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2001.SSC-AP.1.en
– ident: e_1_2_10_45_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00084-1
– start-page: 357
  volume-title: Ecological Consequences of Habitat Heterogeneity
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_10_55_1
– volume: 49
  start-page: 139
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_10_98_1
  article-title: Status of dormice (Muscardinus avellanarius) in Denmark
  publication-title: Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungarica
– ident: e_1_2_10_17_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10841-004-1332-5
– volume-title: A Review of British Mammals: Population Estimates and Conservation Status of British Mammals other than Cetaceans.
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_10_39_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_47_1
  doi: 10.1038/35099540
– volume: 59
  start-page: 233
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_10_57_1
  article-title: The ecology of weasels (Mustela nivalis) on mixed farmland in southern England
  publication-title: Biologia, Bratislava
– ident: e_1_2_10_76_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00057.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_33_1
  doi: 10.2307/2404895
– ident: e_1_2_10_85_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01218.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_10_1
  doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0921
– volume-title: Live Trapping Small Mammals: A Practical Guide
  year: 1990
  ident: e_1_2_10_37_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_14_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00124-4
– ident: e_1_2_10_15_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00548.x
– volume-title: Arable Area Payments 1998/1999, Explanatory Guide: Parts 1 & 2
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_10_60_1
– volume-title: ) Britain's Mammals: The Challenge for Conservation.
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_10_54_1
– volume: 108
  start-page: 135
  year: 1989
  ident: e_1_2_10_80_1
  article-title: The ‘Conservation Headland’ experiment in cereal ecosystems
  publication-title: Entomologist
– ident: e_1_2_10_24_1
  doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1325
– start-page: 26
  volume-title: Ecology and Conservation of Lowland Farmland Birds
  year: 2000
  ident: e_1_2_10_79_1
– volume: 3
  start-page: 149
  year: 1992
  ident: e_1_2_10_102_1
  article-title: Britain's arable weeds
  publication-title: British Wildlife
– ident: e_1_2_10_52_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00173-1
– ident: e_1_2_10_65_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00119-X
– volume-title: Countryside Survey 1990: Main Report
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_2_10_5_1
– volume: 54
  start-page: 203
  year: 1999
  ident: e_1_2_10_12_1
  article-title: Margin/field interfaces and small mammals
  publication-title: Aspects of Applied Biology
– ident: e_1_2_10_99_1
  doi: 10.2307/2404980
– ident: e_1_2_10_70_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.034
– volume-title: Hedgerow management, dormice and biodiversity
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_10_11_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_62_1
  doi: 10.2307/2404256
– ident: e_1_2_10_48_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00550.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_87_1
  doi: 10.1017/S095283690100156X
– volume: 26
  start-page: 190
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_10_29_1
  article-title: The effects of organic farming on surface‐active spider assemblages in wheat in southern England, U.K
  publication-title: Journal of Arachnology
– ident: e_1_2_10_92_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00342-5
– start-page: 64
  volume-title: Conservation and Conflict: Mammals and Farming in Britain
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_10_25_1
– start-page: 106
  volume-title: Conservation and Conflict: Mammals and Farming in Britain
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_10_58_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_18_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.004
– ident: e_1_2_10_44_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00117-8
– ident: e_1_2_10_56_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00775.x
– volume: 9
  start-page: 279
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_10_23_1
  article-title: Changes in the abundance of invertebrates and plants on British farmland
  publication-title: British Wildlife
– ident: e_1_2_10_63_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2907.2003.00004.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/0016-7185(96)00014-0
– ident: e_1_2_10_95_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00784.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_96_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00626.x
– start-page: 373
  volume-title: The Ecology of Temperate Cereal Fields
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_10_77_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_9_1
  doi: 10.1080/00063650309461304
– ident: e_1_2_10_59_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(98)00141-9
– ident: e_1_2_10_71_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00695.x
– volume-title: Managing Set‐aside Land for Wildlife
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_2_10_31_1
– volume-title: The Conservation Management of Arable Field Margins
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_2_10_74_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_50_1
  doi: 10.1038/23127
– volume-title: The Water Vole (Arvicola Terrestris) in Britain 1989–1990: Its Distribution and Changing Status
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_2_10_82_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_36_1
  doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0357
– ident: e_1_2_10_64_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.1994.tb04942.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_75_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00976.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_67_1
  doi: 10.1080/00063650409461341
SSID ssj0002742
Score 2.061563
Snippet 1. The impacts of agricultural intensification on farmland wildlife have been the subject of increasing concern, particularly over the last two decades....
ABSTRACT 1 The impacts of agricultural intensification on farmland wildlife have been the subject of increasing concern, particularly over the last two...
The impacts of agricultural intensification on farmland wildlife have been the subject of increasing concern, particularly over the last two decades....
SourceID proquest
crossref
wiley
istex
fao
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 259
SubjectTerms Agricultural land
Agricultural practices
Agriculture
Animal populations
Apodemus
Biodiversity
Commuting
conservation headlands
edge effects
Farming
field margins
Habitats
hedgerows
Heterogeneity
Impact analysis
Intensive farming
landscape
landscapes
Mammals
Organic farming
organic production
Population decline
Wildlife
Wildlife conservation
wood mice
Title Mammals, agri-environment schemes and set-aside - what are the putative benefits
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-5883CQVG-B/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1046%2Fj.1440-1770.2002.00172_37_4.x
https://www.proquest.com/docview/233351985
Volume 37
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1baxUxEB5qQfHFu3StSh7UJ_eQk2RvIkgttkU4FS_HFl_CJJvVUs-Fs3uw-NSfIPgP-0ucZM-eXvBBUfZlYZmwSSaTbzKTbwAeEcKXVe6juiY1sSqsi3NhVJwKVBU62y-DozjYTXeG6vV-sr8Cb7q7MC0_xPLAza-MYK_9AkfTViHhgd22i0tmGQ-ZBr3gzmiZadXzoNLnb3mQ9O6UTsqHJduoQhKTKudX4PHFKOdvWzu3Z12qcEJI1k_C0TlYehbcht1p6zpMu361SSmHvXljevb7BcrH_9jxG3BtgWTZRqt6N2HFjW_B5U-TcE5_G_YGOBqRbj9l-Hl2cHL848yVOkYutRu5muG4ZLVr6Cv6sqHs5Pgn-_YFG4Yzxwiasum8CczkzJBNrg6a-sUdGG69-rC5Ey-qOMRWqpTHpiiFKxKB3MrUIa9SI3Nj-ygL5EklE1O6kqvSEBZxpcjISgiUqiQxUyVpJe_C6ngydmvAnKVHEqawztPaCMRSZZ5wnxfCGIsRPO_mSdsFxbmvtPFVh1C7SoOro-idxs4X4BT6dOz0UQTpUnzacn38qeAaKYX2w1nr4Xvho8EEbSWB7QieBE1ZNoizQ59LlyV6b3dbJ3kuN99-3NYvI1jvVEkvzEithZS-gGKeRPAsqMTf_ZcebAz6nN_7F-F1uBqOs0P-4n1YbWZz94BwWGMehsX1C8YXH_w
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB6VIh4X3qihPHwATmTJ2o6TICRUKtoFmhWPLq24WLbjQFV2t2yyouLUn4DEP-wvYexktw9xAIFyiRSNFdsz428engG4jwiflamL6mqhQ54ZG6ZU81BQxUtlTbfwhmLeF70Bf7Udby_Am9ldmKY-xNzh5iTD62sn4M4h_bgNS7ZS7gKTSRL5VIOOt2ckSyTvIKo867p8eyPr3VFBKReYbOIKcYjMnJ6HB6fjnL8d7sSpdaZUY8Sybhv2TwDT4_DWn09rl-HrbGZNWspuZ1rrjvl-qujj_5z6FbjUglmy0nDfVViwo2tw7uPYu-qvw1auhkNk70dEfZrsHB78OHarjqBVbYe2ImpUkMrW-FW5zqHk8OAn-fZZ1URNLEF0SvamtS9OTjSq5XKnrp7dgMHai83VXtg2cggN4yIKdVZQm8VURYYJq6JSaJZq01UsU1FcslgXtoh4oRGO2IImqCioYrxAMl3GomQ3YXE0HtklINbgwxBWGOsq21ClCp64mvtRRrU2KoCns42Spq1y7pptfJE-2s6Ft3Y4vuPauR6cVB6tndwPQMzJ95pyH39KuIRcId1yVnLwnrqAMKJbhng7gIeeVeYDqsmuS6dLYrnVX5dxmrLVtx_W5fMAlme8JFtNUknKmOuhmMYBPPE88Xf_JfOVvBtFt_6F-B5c6G3mG3LjZf_1Mlz03m2fzngbFuvJ1N5BWFbru17SfgHS_CQX
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Zb9QwEB6VIqq-cKOGcvgBeCJL1nYuhIRKy7Ycu5xLK14sXylV2UObrKh46k9A4h_2lzB2sttDPIBAeYkU2Yrtb8bfeMYzAPeQ4bMic15dlaiQ59qGGVU8TKjkhbS6bbyh2O0lW33-cifeWYA3s7swdX6I-YGbkwyvr52Aj03xqPFKNkLu_JJpGvlIg5Y3ZwRLBW8hqTzPkyhzMN94f5xPyvkla7dCHCKWsyW4f9bN-dvuTm1a5wo5QirrVuHgFC89yW799tS5BOPZwOqolP3WtFIt_f1Mzsf_OPLLcLGhsmStxt4VWLDDq3Dh88gf1F-D7a4cDBDcD4ncnewdHf44caeOoE1tB7YkcmhIaSv8Kl3dUHJ0-JN8-yIrIieWIDcl42nlU5MThUq52KvKp9eh33n-cX0rbMo4hJrhIoQqN9TmMZWRZomVUZEolindliyXUVywWBlrIm4UkhFraIpqgkrGDTZTRZwU7AYsDkdDuwLEanwYkgptXV4bKqXhqcu4H-VUKS0DeDJbJ6GbHOeu1MZX4X3tPPG2Dsd3nDtXgZOK47kTBwEk8-bjOtnHnzZcQVAIN52l6H-gzh2M3JYh2w7ggUfKvEM52XfBdGkstnubIs4ytv7u06Z4FsDqDEqi0SOloIy5CopZHMBjD4m_-y_RXeu2o-jmvzS-C0tvNzri9Yveq1VY9kfbPpbxFixWk6m9jZysUne8nP0CT3sizw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mammals%2C+agri-environment+schemes+and+set-aside+-+what+are+the+putative+benefits&rft.jtitle=Mammal+review&rft.au=MACDONALD%2C+D.W&rft.au=TATTERSALL%2C+F.H&rft.au=SERVICE%2C+K.M&rft.au=FIRBANK%2C+L.G&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.pub=Oxford%2C+UK+%3A+Blackwell+Publishing+Ltd&rft.issn=0305-1838&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=277&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046%2Fj.1440-1770.2002.00172_37_4.x&rft.externalDocID=US201300833150
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0305-1838&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0305-1838&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0305-1838&client=summon