Mammals, agri-environment schemes and set-aside - what are the putative benefits
1. The impacts of agricultural intensification on farmland wildlife have been the subject of increasing concern, particularly over the last two decades. Population declines have occurred for a number of mammalian species, sometimes drastically so, and changes in farming practice are believed to be s...
Saved in:
Published in | Mammal review Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 259 - 277 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.10.2007
Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | 1. The impacts of agricultural intensification on farmland wildlife have been the subject of increasing concern, particularly over the last two decades. Population declines have occurred for a number of mammalian species, sometimes drastically so, and changes in farming practice are believed to be significant contributory factors. 2. The major policy instruments for delivering environmental benefits on farmland are agri-environment schemes. These encourage farmers to adopt more environmentally sensitive farming practices to promote farmland biodiversity. Additionally, compulsory set-aside, which reduces agricultural surplus, could also have positive impacts on wildlife. In this paper we consider some of the putative benefits of agri-environment schemes and set-aside for mammals. 3. We review how establishment and management options within agri-environment schemes and set-aside might affect habitat resources for mammals. For example, conservation headlands increase plant and invertebrate resources within the crop edge for mammals such as wood mice. Grassy field margins can support communities of smaller mammals, and hedgerows may act as important commuting and hunting routes. Their potential will depend on factors such as seed mixtures used, timing and severity of cutting, and length of time they have been in place. 4. At a farm level, habitat heterogeneity may be increased through organic agriculture, which is supported by some agri-environment schemes. Studies suggest significant benefits to mammals, including wood mice and bats. However, it is increasingly recognized that effective conservation of farmland mammals must seek solutions at the landscape scale, addressing such issues as habitat connectivity between farms. One approach may be the better targeting of scheme agreements. 5. We suggest that agri-environment schemes and set-aside can contribute to the conservation of mammals on farmland. Recent policy changes are likely to have further positive impacts on farmland wildlife but appropriate mammal monitoring programmes must be developed rigorously to assess their effects. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2907.2007.00100.x ArticleID:MAM100 ark:/67375/WNG-5883CQVG-B istex:5F76ED613C1C5C331E37ED4439E87503EC18C0D5 Present address: North Wyke Research Station, Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB. Editor: RM Present address: School of Health and Biosciences, University of East London, Stratford Campus, Romford Road, Stratford, London E15 1LZ, UK. SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 0305-1838 1365-2907 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1440-1770.2002.00172_37_4.x |