Evaluation of the Arctic Sea-Ice Simulation on SODA3 Datasets

This study evaluates the Arctic sea-ice simulation of the SODA3 dataset driven by different atmospheric forcing fields and explores the errors of the Arctic sea-ice simulation caused by the forcing field. We find that the SODA3 data driven by different forcing fields represent a significant systemat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAdvances in atmospheric sciences Vol. 40; no. 12; pp. 2302 - 2317
Main Authors Ge, Zhicheng, Wang, Xuezhu, Wang, Xidong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Science Press 01.12.2023
Springer Nature B.V
Key Laboratory of Marine Hazards Forecasting,Ministry of Natural Resources,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China%Key Laboratory of Marine Hazards Forecasting,Ministry of Natural Resources,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory(Zhuhai),Zhuhai 519000,China
Key Laboratory of Marine Science and Numerical Modeling,Ministry of Natural Resources,Qingdao 266061,China%Key Laboratory of Marine Hazards Forecasting,Ministry of Natural Resources,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study evaluates the Arctic sea-ice simulation of the SODA3 dataset driven by different atmospheric forcing fields and explores the errors of the Arctic sea-ice simulation caused by the forcing field. We find that the SODA3 data driven by different forcing fields represent a significant systematical error in the simulation of Arctic sea-ice concentration, showing a low concentration of thick ice and a high concentration of thin ice. In terms of sea-ice extent, the SODA3 data from different versions well characterize the interannual variability and declining trend in the observed data, but they overestimate the overall Arctic sea-ice extent, which is related to excessive simulation of ice in the sea-ice margin. Compared to observations, all the chosen SODA3 reanalysis versions driven by different atmospheric forcing generally tend to underestimate the Arctic sea-ice thickness, especially for thick ice in the multi-year sea-ice regions. Inaccurate simulations of Arctic sea-ice transport may partly explain the error in SODA3 sea-ice thickness in multi-year sea-ice areas. The results of different SDOA3 versions differ greatly in the Beaufort Sea, the Fram Strait, and the Central Arctic Sea. The difference in sea-ice thickness among different SODA3 versions is primarily due to the thermodynamic contribution, which may come from the diversity of atmospheric forcing fields. Our work provides a reference for using SODA3 data to study Arctic sea ice.
ISSN:0256-1530
1861-9533
DOI:10.1007/s00376-023-2320-6