Declines in soil carbon storage under no tillage can be alleviated in the long run

•In the early years of adoption, no-tillage (NT) increased surface SOC and reduced it in deeper layers.•NT-driven SOC losses diminished over time and the net change was approaching zero at 14 years.•Annual precipitation and initial SOC were the most influential variables on the effect of NT on SOC....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeoderma Vol. 425; p. 116028
Main Authors Cai, Andong, Han, Tianfu, Ren, Tianjing, Sanderman, Jonathan, Rui, Yichao, Wang, Bin, Smith, Pete, Xu, Minggang, Li, Yu'e
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.11.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•In the early years of adoption, no-tillage (NT) increased surface SOC and reduced it in deeper layers.•NT-driven SOC losses diminished over time and the net change was approaching zero at 14 years.•Annual precipitation and initial SOC were the most influential variables on the effect of NT on SOC. Improved management of agricultural soils plays a critical role in mitigating climate change. We studied the temporal effects of the adoption of no-tillage (NT) management, often touted as an important carbon sequestration strategy, on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage in surface and subsurface soil layers by performing a meta-analysis of 1061 pairs of published experimental data comparing NT and conventional tillage (CT). In the early years of adoption, NT increased surface (0–10 cm) SOC storage compared to CT but reduced it in deeper layers leading to a decrease of SOC in the entire soil profile. These NT-driven SOC losses diminished over time and the net change was approaching zero at 14 years. Our findings demonstrate that NT is not a simple guaranteed solution for drawing down atmospheric CO2 and regenerating the lost SOC in cropping soils globally and highlight the importance of long-term NT for the recovery of initial SOC losses.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0016-7061
1872-6259
DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116028