An effervescence-assisted microextraction for parabens in foodstuffs based on deep eutectic solvent composed of methyltrioctyl ammonium chloride and decanoic acid

•A novel deep eutectic solvent (DES) based on methyltrioctyl ammonium chloride and decanoic acid was developed.•The DES had high hydrophobicity and was quite suitable for the emulsification microextraction of trace parabens.•Sodium carbonate facilitated the dissolution of parabens and phase separati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood chemistry Vol. 433; p. 137348
Main Authors Cao, Jiangping, Shi, Lei, He, Yifei, Wang, Tingting, Zeng, Baizhao, Zhao, Faqiong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.02.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•A novel deep eutectic solvent (DES) based on methyltrioctyl ammonium chloride and decanoic acid was developed.•The DES had high hydrophobicity and was quite suitable for the emulsification microextraction of trace parabens.•Sodium carbonate facilitated the dissolution of parabens and phase separation by enhancing pH and generating CO2.•The developed method was efficient, sensitive, inexpensive, and eco-friendly. An efficient and ecofriendly effervescence-assisted emulsification microextraction approach based on hydrophobic deep eutectic solvent (EA-EME-DES) was developed for the sensitive chromatographic determination of parabens (i.e., methyl-, ethyl-, propyl- and butylparaben) in foodstuffs. The DES extractant consisted of methyltrioctyl ammonium chloride (MTAC) and decanoic acid (DecA) (1:3, mol/mol), and had high hydrophobicity, solubility and stability. During the microextraction procedure, sodium carbonate was introduced to facilitate the dissolution of parabens in aqueous solution, DES dispersion and phase separation by enhancing solution pH and generating CO2 bubbles. The developed method exhibited satisfactory linearity (R2 ≥ 0.9986), detection limits (0.01–0.03 μg/g), quantitation limits (0.04–0.09 μg/g), recoveries (87.8% to 111%, with RSDs of 0.8% to 5%) and negligible matrix effects, hence it had remarkable effectiveness and applicability in determining parabens in complex foodstuffs.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137348