Unconscious emotional processing

•We discuss the construct of “unconscious emotion” introduced in Thomson and Coates’ opinion paper.•Emotions are conscious because they involve a subjective experience.•Instead, we propose to use “unconscious emotional processes.”•Thomson and Coates’ methodology elegantly reveals implicit affective...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFood quality and preference Vol. 92; p. 104177
Main Authors Sander, David, Delplanque, Sylvain
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•We discuss the construct of “unconscious emotion” introduced in Thomson and Coates’ opinion paper.•Emotions are conscious because they involve a subjective experience.•Instead, we propose to use “unconscious emotional processes.”•Thomson and Coates’ methodology elegantly reveals implicit affective associations. In their opinion paper, Thomson and Coates mention that their title: “Are unconscious emotions important in product assessment? How can we access them?”, “presents several immediate challenges”. We agree, and we suggest that an interesting challenge already starts with the definition of what an unconscious emotion is. In particular, one may ask: what is unconscious in a so-called “unconscious emotion”? In this commentary, we first discuss the very construct of “unconscious emotion.” Then, we discuss this construct with respect to componential approaches to emotion, and we argue that the construct of “unconscious emotion” is subject to debate because the feeling component is typically considered as constitutive of an emotion. We conclude that it may be particularly useful for future research not to focus on “unconscious emotions” but rather on specific “unconscious emotional processes”, and how to measure them using a hypothesis-driven approach.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0950-3293
1873-6343
DOI:10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104177