Respiratory morbidity in twins by birth order, gestational age and mode of delivery

To evaluate the relationship between respiratory morbidity in twins by gestational age, birth order and mode of delivery. All twin deliveries at <37 weeks, registered in a national database, in the period 2003-2012 were classified into four gestational age groups: 33-36, 30-32, 28-29, and <28...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of perinatal medicine Vol. 44; no. 8; pp. 899 - 902
Main Authors Bricelj, Katja, Tul, Natasa, Lasic, Mateja, Bregar, Andreja Trojner, Verdenik, Ivan, Lucovnik, Miha, Blickstein, Isaac
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Germany De Gruyter 01.11.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To evaluate the relationship between respiratory morbidity in twins by gestational age, birth order and mode of delivery. All twin deliveries at <37 weeks, registered in a national database, in the period 2003-2012 were classified into four gestational age groups: 33-36, 30-32, 28-29, and <28 weeks. Outcome variables included transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and need for assisted ventilation. A total of 1836 twins were born vaginally, and 2142 twins were born by cesarean delivery, for a grand total of 3978 twins. TTN did not appear to be related to birth order and to the mode of delivery. In contrast, RDS was more frequent among the second born twins in the vaginal birth groups born at 30-36 weeks [odds ratio (OR) 2.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-5.1 and OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.5 for 33-36 weeks and 30-32 weeks, respectively], whereas this trend was seen in the cesarean birth groups born earlier (OR 3.8, 95% CI 1.1-13.0 for 28-29 weeks). Cesarean delivery significantly increased the frequency of RDS in twin A as well as in twin B compared with vaginal birth, but only at gestational ages <30 weeks. Mode of delivery and birth order have a gestational age dependent effect on the incidence of RDS.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0300-5577
1619-3997
DOI:10.1515/jpm-2015-0404