Autonomy and critique in the goal-oriented university: the paradox of teaching reflexivity

• Published in: Journal of philosophy of education Vol. 59; no. 1; pp. 31 - 42
• Main Author: Berglund, Leo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 01.02.2025
• Subjects: critical thinking; critique; Educational Sciences; higher education; Institutionalization; Jon Elster; Luc Boltanski; pedagogical paradox; Personal Autonomy; Reflexivity; Utbildningsvetenskap
• ISSN: 0309-8249; 1467-9752; 1467-9752
• DOI: 10.1093/jopedu/qhae052

This article explores the meaning of the task of teaching students to formulate critique in relation to the so-called ‘pedagogical paradox’, according to which the educational ideal of individual autonomy is contradicted by the practice of planning and control, which is particularly pronounced in the influential model of ‘constructive alignment’. Taking Kant’s idea of enlightenment and autonomy as a starting point, I introduce Luc Boltanski’s concept of reflexivity and link it to Jon Elster’s discussion of ‘states that are essentially by-products’. In doing so, I advance the view that genuine critique typically emerges from a shift in perspective, from the pragmatic realization of goals according to institutionalized practices to a metapragmatic reflection on those practices. Since teaching is itself an institutionalized practice, personal reflexivity can only be understood as a by-product of teaching, and, contra the logic of models like constructive alignment, it cannot be set as a direct objective. Emerging from the subject itself, rather than from the influence of an educational technique, personal reflexivity should be recognized as an important aspect of the subject’s transition from youth to maturity.