No harm from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor inhibitors in patients with COVID-19. Results of a prospective study on a hospital-based cohort

This study aims to assess the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor inhibitors (ARBs) on the course of COVID-19. It is a prospective study on 221 (M/F ratio= 143/78, mean age 72±13) consecutive hypertensive patients with COVID-19: 76 (34.4%) treated with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inItalian journal of medicine Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 162 - 166
Main Authors Anzola, Gian Paolo, Bartolaminelli, Clara, Gregorini, Gina Alessandra, Coazzoli, Chiara, Gatti, Francesca, Mora, Alessandra, Charalampakis, Dimitrios, Palmigiano, Andrea, De Simone, Michele, Comini, Alice, Dellaglio, Erica, Cassetti, Salvatore, Chiesa, Maurizio, Spedini, Francesca, D'Ottavi, Patrizia, Savio, Maria Cristina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published PAGEPress Publications 01.09.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study aims to assess the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor inhibitors (ARBs) on the course of COVID-19. It is a prospective study on 221 (M/F ratio= 143/78, mean age 72±13) consecutive hypertensive patients with COVID-19: 76 (34.4%) treated with ACEIs, 63 (28.5%) with ARBs and 82 (37.1%) with antihypertensives OTHER than ACEIs or ARBs. They were all followed up until discharge or death. BAD outcome was defined as the need for invasive mechanical ventilation or death. The three classes of medication were well balanced for confounding variables. BAD outcome was overall recorded in 63/221 (28%) patients, in 20/76 (26%) of ACEI, in 17/63 (27%) of ARB and in 26/82 (32%) of OTHER users, with no statistically significant difference in any comparison. These findings refute the hypothesis that treatment with ACEIs or ARBs may negatively affect the course of COVID-19.
ISSN:1877-9344
1877-9352
DOI:10.4081/itjm.2020.1313