Bacterial community composition in a two-stage anaerobic membrane bioreactor for co-digestion of food waste and food court wastewater

This study investigated the microbial community of a two-stage anaerobic membrane bioreactor (2S-AnMBR) co-digesting food waste and food court wastewater. The hydrolysis reactor (HR) was dominated by Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phylum, with genus Lactobacillus enriched due to food waste fermentatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBioresource technology Vol. 391; p. 129925
Main Authors Le, Thanh-Son, Bui, Xuan-Thanh, Nguyen, Phuoc-Dan, Hao Ngo, Huu, Dang, Bao-Trong, Le Quang, Do-Thanh, Thi Pham, Tan, Visvanathan, Chettiyappan, Diels, Ludo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.01.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study investigated the microbial community of a two-stage anaerobic membrane bioreactor (2S-AnMBR) co-digesting food waste and food court wastewater. The hydrolysis reactor (HR) was dominated by Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phylum, with genus Lactobacillus enriched due to food waste fermentation. The up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) was dominated by genus such as Methanobacterium and Methanosaeta. The presence of Methanobacterium (91 %) and Methanosaeta (7.5 %) suggested that methane production pathways inevitably undergo both hydrogenotrophic and acetoclastic methanogenesis. Hydrogen generated during hydrolysis fermentation in the HR contributed to methane production in the UASB via hydrogenotrophic pathways. However, the low abundance of Methanosaeta in the UASB can be attributed to the limited inffluent of volatile fatty acids (VFA) and the competitive presence of acetate-consuming bacteria Acinetobacter. The UASB exhibited more excellent dispersion and diversity of metabolic pathways compared to the HR, indicating efficient methane production.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129925