Clean Chip Residual: A Substrate Component for Growing Annuals

• Published in: HortTechnology (Alexandria, Va.) Vol. 18; no. 3; pp. 423 - 432
• Main Authors: Boyer, Cheryl R, Fain, Glenn B, Gilliam, Charles H, Gallagher, Thomas V, Torbert, H. Allen, Sibley, Jeff L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 2008
• Subjects: Ageratum houstonianum; bark; bedding plants; chlorophyll; clean chip residual; conifer needles; container-grown plants; dry matter accumulation; geographical variation; greenhouse production; growing media; Impatiens walleriana; nursery crops; particle size; particle size distribution; peat; Salivia x superba; Salvia; soilless media; wood fibers; Alabama; Mississippi
• ISSN: 1063-0198; 1943-7714
• DOI: 10.21273/horttech.18.3.423

A study was conducted at Auburn University in Auburn, AL, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Southern Horticultural Laboratory in Poplarville, MS, to evaluate clean chip residual (CCR) as an alternative substrate component for annual bedding plant production. Clean chip residual used in this study was processed through a horizontal grinder with 4-inch screens at the site and was then processed again through a swinging hammer mill to pass a 3/4- or 1/2-inch screen. Two CCR particle sizes were used alone or blended with 10% (9:1) or 20% (4:1) peatmoss (PM) (by volume) and were compared with control treatments, pine bark (PB), and PB blends (10% and 20% PM). Three annual species, 'Blue Hawaii' ageratum (Ageratum houstonianum), 'Vista Purple' salvia (Salvia xsuperba), and 'Coral' or 'White' impatiens (Impatiens walleriana), were transplanted from 36-cell (12.0-inch3) flats into 1-gal containers, placed on elevated benches in a greenhouse, and hand watered as needed. Ageratum plants grown at Auburn had leaf chlorophyll content similar or greater than that of plants grown in PB. There were no differences in salvia; however, impatiens plants grown in PB substrates at Auburn had less leaf chlorophyll content than those grown in CCR. There were no differences in ageratum, salvia, or impatiens leaf chlorophyll content at Poplarville. There were no differences in growth indices (GI) or shoot dry weight (SDW) of ageratum, while the largest salvia was in PB:PM and the largest impatiens were in PB-based substrates at Auburn. The GI of ageratum at Poplarville was similar among treatments, but plants grown in 4:1 1/2-inch CCR:PM were the largest. Salvia was largest in 4:1 CCR:PM and PB:PM, and although there were no differences in GI for impatiens at Poplarville, the greatest SDW occurred with PB:PM. Foliar nutrient content analysis indicated elevated levels of manganese and zinc in treatments containing CCR at Auburn and PB at Poplarville. At the study termination, two of three annual species tested at both locations had very similar growth when compared with standard PB substrates. This study demonstrates that CCR is a viable alternative substrate in greenhouse production of ageratum, salvia, and impatiens in large containers.