Double–Contrast‐Enhanced Sonography for Diagnosis of Rectal Lesions With Pathologic Correlation

Objectives Transabdominal sonography with a gastrointestinal contrast agent has been widely used in China for investigation of digestive disorders. Double–contrast‐enhanced sonography combines a gastrointestinal luminal contrast agent with an intravenous contrast agent for imaging of lesions. The pu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of ultrasound in medicine Vol. 33; no. 4; pp. 575 - 583
Main Authors Lu, Man, Yan, Brain, Song, Jun, Ping, Wu, Yue, Lin-Xian, Song, Bin
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 01.04.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objectives Transabdominal sonography with a gastrointestinal contrast agent has been widely used in China for investigation of digestive disorders. Double–contrast‐enhanced sonography combines a gastrointestinal luminal contrast agent with an intravenous contrast agent for imaging of lesions. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the value of double–contrast‐enhanced sonography for preoperative diagnosis of rectal lesions. Methods We conducted a prospective single‐center study using double–contrast‐enhanced sonography of rectal lesions. Patients were administered both rectal and intravenous contrast agents, and imaging was performed transabdominally, transanally, and transrectally. Morphologic characteristics and perfusion parameters were compared between histologically proven adenocarcinomas, adenomas, and inflammatory masses. Perfusion parameters were analyzed with time‐intensity curves, measuring the contrast arrival time, time to peak, peak intensity, and area under the curve of the lesions and normal rectal tissue. Results From January 2009 to September 2012, 420 patients were recruited, with 227 patients meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria and having 232 rectal lesions analyzed (172 rectal adenocarcinomas, 45 adenomas, and 15 inflammatory masses). Adenocarcinomas had variable enhancement patterns. Adenomas were all hypoenhanced in a homogeneous pattern. Inflammatory masses had a hyperenhanced rim with no central enhancement. Time‐intensity curve perfusion parameters (arrival time, time to peak, peak intensity, and area under the curve) of rectal adenocarcinomas, adenomas, and inflammatory masses were significantly different compared to normal rectal tissue (P < .05). The differences in the arrival time, peak intensity, and time to peak among the different lesions were also significant (P < .05). Conclusions Double–contrast‐enhanced sonographic assessment of morphologic enhancement patterns combined with vascularity parameters may help differentiate benign and malignant rectal lesions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
DOI:10.7863/ultra.33.4.575