Uptake of cyclic C6O4 in maize and tomato: Results from a greenhouse study

Cyclic C6O4 (cC6O4, CAS number 1190931-27-1) is a perfluoralkyl ether used as a polymerization aid in the synthesis of fluoropolymers and produced since 2011 as substitute of PFOA. This work reports the first data on bioaccumulation of cC6O4 on terrestrial plants (maize and tomato). In general, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Science of the total environment Vol. 924; p. 171613
Main Authors Bizzotto, Elisa C., Libralato, Giovanni, de Natale, Antonino, Scanferla, Petra, Vighi, Marco, Marcomini, Antonio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 10.05.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Cyclic C6O4 (cC6O4, CAS number 1190931-27-1) is a perfluoralkyl ether used as a polymerization aid in the synthesis of fluoropolymers and produced since 2011 as substitute of PFOA. This work reports the first data on bioaccumulation of cC6O4 on terrestrial plants (maize and tomato). In general, the observed accumulation and translocation of cC6O4 in plants is low or negligible. For maize a bioconcentration factor (BCFdw/dw) of about 39 was observed in the root compartment and much lower (BCFdw/dw = 12) in the aboveground tissues. In tomato the observed BCFs are substantially lower, with a maximum of 2.5 in leaves. The differences observed between the uptake and distribution of cC6O4 in maize and tomato plants are probably due to differences in plant physiology (but also in the experimental design of the tests). Maize plants grown at different concentrations in this study did not show relevant differences in term of biomass and growth, while tomato plants exposed to cC6O4 were subject to a delay in the ripening of the fruits (and relative biomass). The overall results are discussed in comparison with literature data available for legacy PFASs but the comparison is difficult due to differences in the experimental design. It is relevant to note that the concentrations tested in this study are significantly higher than expected environmental concentrations. [Display omitted] •Uptake from soil and translocation of cC6O4 are studied on terrestrial plants (maize and tomato).•The uptake (as BCF) is low but the behavior of cC6O4 is substantially different in the two plants.•For maize the maximum concentration is in roots while for tomato is in leaves.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171613