A dynamic multi-agent approach for modeling the evolution of multi-hazard accident scenarios in chemical plants

• Published in: Reliability engineering & system safety Vol. 207; p. 107349
• Main Authors: Chen, Chao, Reniers, Genserik, Khakzad, Nima
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01.03.2021
• Subjects: Cascading effects; Dynamic evolution; Multi-agent; Multi-hazard risk assessment; Toxic release; Multi-agent; Multi-hazard risk assessment; Dynamic evolution; Toxic release; Cascading effects
• ISSN: 0951-8320
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107349

•A multi-agent method is developed for modeling multi-hazard in chemical plants.•The method is based on dynamic graph and Monte Carlo simulation (DGMC).•The spatial-temporal evolution of hazards arising from toxic release are considered.•The vulnerability of humans and installations subject to multi-hazard can be obtained.•Different personal protective equipment may be formulated for different people. In the chemical industry, multi-hazard (toxic, flammable, and explosive) materials such as acrylonitrile are stored, transported, and processed in large quantities. A release of multi-hazard materials can simultaneously or sequentially lead to acute toxicity, fire and explosion. The spatial-temporal evolution of hazards may also result in cascading effects. In this study, a dynamic methodology called “Dynamic Graph Monte Carlo” (DGMC) is developed to model the evolution of multi-hazard accident scenarios and assess the vulnerability of humans and installations exposed to such hazards. In the DGMC model, chemical plants are modeled as a multi-agent system with three kinds of agents: hazardous installations, ignition sources, and humans while considering the uncertainties and interdependencies among the agents and their impacts on the evolution of hazards and possible escalation effects. A case study is analyzed using the DGMC methodology, demonstrating that the risk can be underestimated if the spatial-temporal evolution of multi-hazard scenarios is neglected. Vapor cloud explosion (VCEs) may lead to more severe damage than fire, and the safety distances which are implemented only based on fire hazards are not sufficient to prevent from the damage of VCEs. [Display omitted]