To tube or not to tube : do infants and children need post-laparotomy gastric decompression ?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of nasogastric (NG) decompression after laparotomy in pediatric surgical practice: 94 children who underwent abdominal surgery by a single surgeon were consecutively prospectively managed without postoperative NG tubes. Patients with either bowel ob...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPediatric surgery international Vol. 13; no. 5-6; pp. 411 - 413
Main Authors SANDLER, A. D, EVANS, D, EIN, S. H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Springer 01.07.1998
Berlin Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of nasogastric (NG) decompression after laparotomy in pediatric surgical practice: 94 children who underwent abdominal surgery by a single surgeon were consecutively prospectively managed without postoperative NG tubes. Patients with either bowel obstruction or intra-abdominal infection were excluded from the study. These children were compared with 94 retrospective, matched controls who were routinely managed with postoperative NG decompression by the same surgeon. Data were analyzed with regard to patient, operative, and outcome variables. There was no difference in gender, age (3.8 +/- 0.5 vs 3.5 +/- 0.4 years, P > 0.7), or postoperative complications (P > 0.8) between the two groups. However, there was a higher incidence of postoperative vomiting (22% vs 11%, P > 0.05) in the children who did not have postoperative NG decompression. Nevertheless, a significant decrease in time to first feed, first stool, and discharge was noted in the group of patients managed without NG tubes (P < 0.05). NG decompression thus need not be routinely used in the pediatric patient undergoing abdominal surgery, as there is no difference in postoperative complications and the hospital stay is shortened.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0179-0358
1437-9813
DOI:10.1007/s003830050351