The clinicopathologic and molecular features, and treatment outcome of fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective comparison with type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma

To compare clinicopathologic, molecular features, and treatment outcome between fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-dRCC) and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (T2 pRCC). Data of T2 pRCC patients and FH-dRCC patients with additional next-generation sequencing information were r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAging (Albany, NY.) Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 3631 - 3646
Main Authors Bai, Junjie, Li, Xiaoyan, Wen, Yahui, Lu, Qing, Chen, Ru, Liu, Rong, Shangguan, Tong, Ye, Yushi, Lin, Jun, Cai, Weizhong, Kang, Deyong, Chen, Jianhui
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Impact Journals 19.02.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To compare clinicopathologic, molecular features, and treatment outcome between fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-dRCC) and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (T2 pRCC). Data of T2 pRCC patients and FH-dRCC patients with additional next-generation sequencing information were retrospectively analyzed. The cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were primary endpoint. A combination of FH and 2-succino-cysteine (2-SC) increased the rate of negative predictive value of FH-dRCC. Compared with T2 pRCC cases, FH-dRCC cases displayed a greater prevalence in young patients, a higher frequency of radical nephrectomy. Seven FH-dRCC and two T2 pRCC cases received systemic therapy. The VEGF treatment was prescribed most frequently, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 22.2% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 30%. A combined therapy with VEGF and checkpoint inhibitor reported an ORR of 40% and a DCR of 100%. FH-dRCC cases showed a shortened CSS ( = 0.042) and DFS ( < 0.001). The genomic sequencing revealed 9 novel mutations. Coupled with genetic detection, immunohistochemical biomarkers (FH and 2-SC) can distinguish the aggressive FH-dRCC from T2 pRCC. Future research is awaited to illuminate the association between the novel mutations and the clinical phenotypes of FH-dRCC in the disease progression.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Equal contribution
ISSN:1945-4589
1945-4589
DOI:10.18632/aging.205549